What have I managed to inadvertantly change?
Now, whenever an application opens a new window it opens under all
current windows so I have to right-click the gnome panel and select
'on top' and then click to maximize it.
New windows used to always open on top. Why would anyone want the
behavior
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go ahead
and keep whining. :o)
Paul,
Stephen wrote:
Paul, Flash is not closed source.
While some of Paul's post was unnecessarily harsh, he was quite
correct on this point.
Adobe Flash Player _is_ closed source, as far as I know.
Best regards,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:13AM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:44:07PM -0700 or thereabouts, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
No they won't -- It's actively being worked on NOW. Some things just
take time. We should be rejoicing in the fact, that Adobe is now going to
be supporting Linux
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:27:52PM +0100 or thereabouts, George Borisov wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Paul, Flash is not closed source.
While some of Paul's post was unnecessarily harsh, he was quite
correct on this point.
Adobe Flash Player _is_ closed source, as far as I know.
Adobe Flash
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:13AM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they
Stephen wrote:
Adobe Flash Player is closed source, but there are other Flash Players.
The specification is open source.
True, but none of these players (AFAIK) support Flash 8/9
formats. (BTW, if they do then please let me know, as I am
getting fed up of the, increasingly more common,
Stephen wrote:
We should be rejoicing in the fact, that Adobe is now going to
be supporting Linux actively in terms of Flash, and Flex.
rejoicing
Erm... woot? *waves a little flag*
/rejoicing
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:27:06PM +0100 or thereabouts, George Borisov wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Adobe Flash Player is closed source, but there are other Flash Players.
The specification is open source.
True, but none of these players (AFAIK) support Flash 8/9
formats. (BTW, if they do
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:13AM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44,
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
If it were closed source, then implementations of it wouldn't be allowed
to exist such as MING, the various open source players, and editors.
The standard itself is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
If it were closed source, then implementations of
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:19:57PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
If it were closed source, then
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:19:57PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jacob S wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
wrote:
On Monday 21 August
* Jacob S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:47:12PM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
In fact, the standard is not open.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWF#Licensing.
In any case, Flash (which is a program) is not open-source, any more than
Acrobat is just because PDF is, in fact, open.
As with
On Monday 21 August 2006 10:32, Stephen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
If it were closed source, then implementations of it wouldn't be
allowed to exist such as MING, the various open
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:46:05AM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
windows??
Macromedia was a company that doesn't
On Saturday 19 August 2006 15:46, gustavo halperin wrote:
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
windows??
Adobe tends to release on Windows first and play catchup with other
On Sunday 20 August 2006 08:18, gustavo halperin wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:46:05AM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go ahead
and keep whining. :o)
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpyko5MVk2B6.pgp
What is your problem paul?I am not promoting it,or whining.Quit being a assOn 8/20/06, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote: If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go ahead
and keep whining. :o)
Does anyone know when/if
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
windows??
I currently have a latest version of Macromedia but in the page
www.metacafe.com I can't see the videos, the page say that I need
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:46:05AM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
windows??
Macromedia was a company that doesn't exist any more. (Bought by
On 08/19/2006, gustavo halperin wrote:
I currently have a latest version of Macromedia but in the page
www.metacafe.com I can't see the videos, the page say that I need
download the latest version of Macromedia, but I have it. Did you
know this problem? Can you see videos from www.metacafe.com
Hello.
I'm having an annoying problem with Gnome after a recent upgrade in sid
(last week). If I launch an application from gnome-terminal, the window
appears hidden by gnome-terminal, and does not get focus, unless I click on
it. This is not the case if I launch it from the panel.
Also, the
The same problem, very annoying :)
В Втр, 11/04/2006 в 13:14 -0400, Victor Munoz пишет:
Hello.
I'm having an annoying problem with Gnome after a recent upgrade in sid
(last week). If I launch an application from gnome-terminal, the window
appears hidden by gnome-terminal, and does not get
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 23:06, Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a
session through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in
control panel does not
Paul Johnson wrote:
Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:06:11 -0500 , Scott Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in control
panel does not have a place to add a new session and the only kdmrc file
Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in control
panel does not have a place to add a new session and
-Original Message-
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:24 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: How to add new Windows Manager to KDM?
Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm.
Everything
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:06:11 -0500
Scott Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything
I could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a
session through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in
Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in control
panel does
Hi,
I've recently switched from slink to potato and installed my fav. irc
client bitchx plus screen of course. But I have a problem with them. I
can't create new windows with /window create command. All I get is:
-:- Opening new screen...
-:- The screen is now dead.
child signaled with 11
Errno
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote
- Forwarded message from Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:02:36 -0400
From: Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Anthony Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New windows
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Forwarded message from Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:02:36 -0400
From: Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Anthony Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New windows
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Hi,
I came from MS Windows to Linux a few months ago. I was tired of crashes and
all that, and I had the feeling I could do better GUI-wise also.
After a while I found Windowmaker, and set up a desktop with several handy dock
apps. A refreshingly approach to a personal desktop environment. Also,
Oooo, dangerous ground... Hopefully this doesn't spark a holy war ;)
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
After a while I found Windowmaker, and set up a desktop with several
handy dock apps. A refreshingly approach to a personal desktop
environment. Also, Windowmaker looks good! So
Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
ignorance:
What exactly is the difference between a window manager and a desktop
environment?
Thanx.
BTW, I second the opinion re: Windowmaker. It's intuitive and easy
to use, it looks funky (and probably will look funkier when
actually while i use and like WindowMaker i think that the look and feel of
win9x is the best thing that M$ ever did. Which may not be saying much but
still the LF is alot better than the underlyeing crap that they write.
Like i said i use WM and like it but the problems of windows does not
On 22 Jun 1999, Revenant wrote:
Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
ignorance:
What exactly is the difference between a window manager and a desktop
environment?
Thanx.
BTW, I second the opinion re: Windowmaker. It's intuitive and easy
to use, it looks
On 22-Jun-99 Revenant wrote:
Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
ignorance:
What exactly is the difference between a window manager and a desktop
environment?
I am also ignorant regarding this. I just know I am perfectly happy with
Windowmaker. So if
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Tim Nicholas wrote:
actually while i use and like WindowMaker i think that the look and feel of
win9x is the best thing that M$ ever did. Which may not be saying much but
still the LF is alot better than the underlyeing crap that they write.
Hi
snip I came from MS
And nobody mentioned the best thing that happened to mankind since sliced
bread: the Tab WM!!! I set up aliases for the programs I need in .bashrc
('net for netscape, 'wp' for WP8, 'sound' for the sound apps, etc. Just
open a window, type the alias and off you go. Simplify thy life. -- Hans
Christian Dysthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a while I found Windowmaker, and set up a desktop with several handy
dock
apps. A refreshingly approach to a personal desktop environment. Also,
Windowmaker looks good! So different from MS, and yet very easy to configure
and use.
Then I see
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Revenant wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
Instead I am again presented with the taskbar and popup menus that hasn't
really changed for years. Is this to conquer new users, or is it becuase
Linux
users secretly have missed the look and feel of
Subject: Re: New windows
Date: Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 08:35:44AM +0100
In reply to:Anthony Campbell
Quoting Anthony Campbell([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 22 Jun 1999, Revenant wrote:
Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
ignorance:
What exactly
On 22 Jun 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
Subject: Re: New windows
Date: Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 08:35:44AM +0100
In reply to:Anthony Campbell
Could some Windowmaker enthusiast tell me what else is needed please?
Anthony
Anthony
What version are you running? I have Version
Paul Seelig wrote:
There is the common misconception coined by the very term Linux
community, that the Linux users are a somewhat homogeneous crowd and
you simply fell for that. The Linux crowd is IMHO by far the most
heterogeneous bunch of computer users imageinable and this refelects
in
55 matches
Mail list logo
