on Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:13:09PM -0800, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is there any functionality in mutt, or a good way to implement it in
> mutt, that allows you to killfile with roughly the same flexibility
> that tin gives you for news?
'spamfilter' gives the ability to create whi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:13:09PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Is there any functionality in mutt, or a good way to implement it in
> mutt, that allows you to killfile with roughly the same flexibility
> that tin gives you for news?
>
I haven't actually tried it but you could probably do somethi
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:07:29AM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> can you reproduce the macros and the relevant parts of your
> procmailrc? wouldl ove to have this!
It's not pretty... and no doubt a dozen people will tell me how to do it
better...
Not my original creation... I got it off the 'net so
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:32:42PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:13:09PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Is there any functionality in mutt, or a good way to implement it in
> > mutt, that allows you to killfile with roughly the same flexibility
> > that tin gives you for ne
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:13:09PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Is there any functionality in mutt, or a good way to implement it in
> mutt, that allows you to killfile with roughly the same flexibility
> that tin gives you for news?
All I did was add a couple of macros that saved from(s) and subj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any functionality in mutt, or a good way to implement it in
mutt, that allows you to killfile with roughly the same flexibility
that tin gives you for news?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
