francis picabia wrote:
> Dejan Ribič wrote:
> > go to http://mozilla.debian.net/ and follow instructions.
>
> Thanks, this helped. Bob mentioned it also. Very simple
> instructions and easy. Now have 3.6 iceweasel and google+
> is accessed. If it is trouble again, maybe I will install
> curren
2011/9/23 Dejan Ribič :
> Dne 23.9.2011 14:22, piše francis picabia:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Scott Ferguson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Works fine for me with Iceweasel 6.0.2 on Squeeze
>>
>> Where was this package from?
>>
>> I have 3.5.16 in squeeze with no testing/unstable, only
>> "squee
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:32:07 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
Hello Bob,
> Squeeze is already released as Stable 6.0. Newer Iceweasel versions
> could only make it into the *next* Testing release later than 6.0
> which is Wheezy (likely 7.0). You can't change the past. You can
> only change the future
Dne 23.9.2011 14:22, piše francis picabia:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
Works fine for me with Iceweasel 6.0.2 on Squeeze
Where was this package from?
I have 3.5.16 in squeeze with no testing/unstable, only
"squeeze main non-free contrib".
In comment from Bob perha
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
>>
> Works fine for me with Iceweasel 6.0.2 on Squeeze
Where was this package from?
I have 3.5.16 in squeeze with no testing/unstable, only
"squeeze main non-free contrib".
In comment from Bob perhaps I should install the browser
from outsi
On 23/09/11 00:33, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:28:34PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:16:56 +0100
>> Darac Marjal wrote:
>>
>> Hello Darac,
>>
>>> 3. Accept that google don't "support" the browser, accept that any
>>> breakages are your own responsibi
On 22/09/11 22:36, francis picabia wrote:
> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it
> does not support iceweasel.
How so?
> Is this something expected to change?
> Perhaps I simply have a problem searching for articles about
> google+ in google search, as I see on rants.org
Brad Rogers wrote:
> francis picabia wrote:
> > Eventually I'll see it maybe in squeeze. I can live with running
>
> Will Iceweasel 5 make it into squeeze? I didn't think it would get
> anything more than security updates.
Squeeze is already released as Stable 6.0. Newer Iceweasel versions
cou
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:54:51 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
>
> > I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it does
> > not support iceweasel. Is this something expected to change?
> > Perhaps I simply have a problem sea
On 22 September 2011 14:06, francis picabia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
>>
>>> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it does not
>>> support iceweasel. Is this something expected to c
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:33:25 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
Hello Darac,
> down or whatever. Unsupported should not equal banned (I'm not saying a
> browser shouldn't be banned, just that one is not the other).
It's okay, IKWYM. "On you own head be it", rather than "Hie thee hence,
Satan".
--
Re
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:45:45 -0300
francis picabia wrote:
Hello francis,
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Brad Rogers
> > I tried that, but it didn't work.
> OK, too bad, but thanks for looking into it. I had read google docs
NP.
> app could be fooled by this, but there must be other test
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:24:44 -0300
francis picabia wrote:
Hello francis,
> Eventually I'll see it maybe in squeeze. I can live with running
Will Iceweasel 5 make it into squeeze? I didn't think it would get
anything more than security updates.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blin
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:28:34PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:16:56 +0100
> Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> Hello Darac,
>
> > 3. Accept that google don't "support" the browser, accept that any
> > breakages are your own responsibility and continue to use the site
> > (T
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:06:57 -0300
> francis picabia wrote:
>
> Hello francis,
>
>> I could trick it into identifying as another browser, but I wondered
>> if it will be supported anyway without hacking the identifier.
>
> I tried that, but i
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:18:46 -0400
"John L. Cunningham" wrote:
Hello John,
> That's the problem. G+ wants to do fancy HTML 5 stuff that IW <4 can't
> handle.
I always wondered what the issue was. Now I know. Thx. A pity google
didn't explain *why* they "do not support your browser"
--
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:06:57 -0300
francis picabia wrote:
Hello francis,
> I could trick it into identifying as another browser, but I wondered
> if it will be supported anyway without hacking the identifier.
I tried that, but it didn't work.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindin
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:16:56 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
Hello Darac,
> 3. Accept that google don't "support" the browser, accept that any
> breakages are your own responsibility and continue to use the site
> (This may also involve contacting google to let you past the
Not an option;
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:06:57 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
>>
>>> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it does not
>>> support iceweasel. Is this something expec
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300
> francis picabia wrote:
>
> Hello francis,
>
>> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it
>> does not support iceweasel. Is this something expected to change?
>
> Which version of Icewe
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300
francis picabia wrote:
Hello francis,
> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it
> does not support iceweasel. Is this something expected to change?
Which version of Iceweasel? I got the same error with v3.6.*, but when
testing got updat
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> I'm using iceweasel 3.5.16 - I think the current release for
> Debian squeeze.
That's the problem. G+ wants to do fancy HTML 5 stuff that IW <4 can't
handle.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> >
> >> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it does not
> >> support iceweasel. Is this someth
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
>
>> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it does not
>> support iceweasel. Is this something expected to change? Perhaps I
>> simply have a problem searching for ar
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:36:19 -0300, francis picabia wrote:
> I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it does not
> support iceweasel. Is this something expected to change? Perhaps I
> simply have a problem searching for articles about google+ in google
> search, as I see on ran
I must remember to launch google chrome to use google+, as it
does not support iceweasel. Is this something expected to change?
Perhaps I simply have a problem searching for articles about
google+ in google search, as I see on rants.org article.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l
26 matches
Mail list logo
