On Lu, 12 nov 12, 16:24:04, David Guntner wrote:
Ok, try this just for grins. Edit your /etc/mtab file, and add the
following line:
/dev/ad6s1 /mnt/ad6s1 ext2fs ro 0 0
Just for the archives: this might be dangerous (if at all possible) on
recent Debian GNU/Linux:
$ ls -l /etc/mtab
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 18:24, David Guntner wrote:
Ok, try this just for grins. Edit your /etc/mtab file, and add the
following line:
/dev/ad6s1 /mnt/ad6s1 ext2fs ro 0 0
(I'm following your example from ad4s1; ordinarily with a Linux kernel
that
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad6s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad6s1 : No
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
On 11/12/12 16:27, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 16:27, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
ad[0,6]s1 are the 2 offending partitions. Also, in the interlude, I went
ahead e2fsck'ed both partitions, both came back w/ '* FILE SYSTEM
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:17:19PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
Are you able to mount those filesystems as ext2? Any ext3 filesystem
should be mountable as ext2.
Tried it:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Mon Nov 12, 02:12 PM] 802 # mount -t ext3
On 11/12/12 18:24, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 16:27, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
ad[0,6]s1 are the 2 offending partitions. Also, in the interlude, I went
ahead e2fsck'ed both
On 11/12/12 21:50, Tom Furie wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:17:19PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
Are you able to mount those filesystems as ext2? Any ext3 filesystem
should be mountable as ext2.
Tried it:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Mon Nov 12, 02:12
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:36AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
*Acck* So it's a typo ?!?!?! I was using
ext2/3/4, not ext2/3/4*fs* I just tried it mounted
when I try ext3fs, it is *nogo* Sooo ext3/4 apparently
*not* supported under
On 11/13/12 00:36, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:36AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
*Acck* So it's a typo ?!?!?! I was using
ext2/3/4, not ext2/3/4*fs* I just tried it mounted
when I try ext3fs, it is *nogo* Sooo ext3/4
I am brand new to Debian, have used RH's for about 10 years, SGI
SuSE before that, Mandrake before that, ConvexOS before that. I
installed Squeeze-kfreeBSD on a Socket 939 Opteron server that I
recently replaced the root drive (which had croaked) on. I like the
small memory footprint
Slackware 14.0 is available and it also has a small footprint. If you
choose not to install all the bloatware no g.u.i. you can probably end up
with a full command line installation except for emacs in a little under a
hundred meg. If you decide to install emacs, I suggest you do it using
On 11/11/12 09:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 10:49 AM] 592 # ll /dev/ad*
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 78 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 79 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0s1
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 82 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad4
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 83
On 11/11/12 13:13, David Christensen wrote:
On 11/11/12 09:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 10:49 AM] 592 # ll /dev/ad*
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 78 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 79 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0s1
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 82 Nov 10
On 11/11/12 13:05, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Slackware 14.0 is available and it also has a small footprint. If you
choose not to install all the bloatware no g.u.i. you can probably end up
with a full command line installation except for emacs in a little under a
hundred meg. If you decide to
On 11/11/12 12:54, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Does Debian-kfreeBSD in fact have ext3fs support ?
I dunno -- perhaps that's the problem. (I use Debian Squeeze i386 and
Debian Wheezy amd64.)
A console-only install of Debian Squeeze i386 can have a fairly small
memory footprint (my CVS
Hello David,
David Christensen dpchr...@holgerdanske.com wrote:
On 11/11/12 09:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 89 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad6s1
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad6s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad6s1 : No such device
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 04:08:47 PM David Christensen wrote:
On 11/11/12 12:54, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Does Debian-kfreeBSD in fact have ext3fs support ?
I dunno -- perhaps that's the problem. (I use Debian Squeeze i386 and
Debian Wheezy amd64.)
A console-only install of
Am 2007-04-15 06:57:16, schrieb Freddy Freeloader:
Michael Pobega wrote:
I have one recurring problem with aptitude. It keeps trying to remove
gnome and everything related to it and a bunch of other stuff.
^^
Fortunately it takes up enough real estate on the
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:00:02 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
simple stuff a drop-in replacement for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 07:13:07AM -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Michael Pobega wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070414 16:28]:
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
...
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used
the apt-get method, which is pretty simple, and have also
downloaded and compiled from source
Michael Pobega wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 07:13:07AM -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Michael Pobega wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:50:59 -0500
Russell L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070414 16:28]:
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
...
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used
the apt-get
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 06:57:16AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I have one recurring problem with aptitude. It keeps trying to remove
gnome and everything related to it and a bunch of other stuff.
Fortunately it takes up enough real estate on the screen that it is
hard to miss and I just
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:00:02PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
[...]
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
sudo apt-get source texmacs
[...]
Are those things a newbie cares about? I've never used them in
the 8
On 14 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Adam Frank wrote:
For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
fronteds like Synaptic.
The only problem for a
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:57:19 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Celejar wrote:
But we did find this for 'build-dep':
http://p12n.org/hacks/aptitude-build-dep
When people say aptitude, they usually refer to the one supplied by Debian.
The above is not included
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch. I'm very
happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who create this great piece
of work.
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used the
apt-get method, which is pretty simple, and have also
For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
fronteds like Synaptic.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:22:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
I'm very happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who
create this great piece of work.
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:22:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
I'm very happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who
create this great piece of work.
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Adam Frank wrote:
For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
fronteds like Synaptic.
The only problem for a beginner using Synaptic is that if it is all she
knows, and X crashes, they have no experience to fall back on.
Its
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used
the apt-get method, which is pretty simple, and have also downloaded
and compiled from source tarballs which is a little more complicated
but doesn't seem to be a big deal. Are there significant advantages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch. I'm
very happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who create this
great piece of work.
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used the
apt-get method, which is
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
simple stuff a drop-in replacement for apt-get.
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
sudo apt-get source texmacs
Replace texmacs
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:00:02PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
simple stuff a drop-in replacement for apt-get.
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:00:02PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
simple stuff a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Adam Frank wrote:
For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
fronteds like Synaptic.
The only problem
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:16:47PM +0100, Nigel Henry wrote:
Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your current
Etch
install pointing to Etch in /etc/apt/sources.list. then I would install
another instance of Etch. I'd keep this pointing to Etch, then when Etch goes
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:34:21PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:37:02 +0100
Nick Demou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]Further down the
release cycle, testing gets naturally more and more stable and
easier and easier to administer and less likely to break as the
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your current Etch
install pointing to Etch in /etc/apt/sources.list. then I would install
another instance of Etch. I'd keep this pointing to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:37:02 +0100
Nick Demou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]Further down the
release cycle, testing gets naturally more and more stable and
easier and easier to administer and less likely to break as the new
versions get massaged into their final release condition.
I
Chris Lale wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your
current Etch install pointing to Etch in /etc/apt/sources.list. then
I would install another instance of Etch. I'd keep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Lale wrote:
Chris Lale wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your
current Etch install pointing to Etch in
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:52:07 +0100
Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling this is likely to start a debate. Be that as it
may, I set my KDE to select on one click and activate on two.
However, if I run konqueror as root, then I get the single click
activation again. Oh well. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:52:07 +0100
Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling this is likely to start a debate. Be that as it
may, I set my KDE to select on one click and activate on two.
However, if I run
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:56:18 +0100
Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure a cp would work just as well, but I like the Auto Skip that
Konqueror does, not to mention I can track the progress.
Have a look at mc (Midnight Commander). It is text mode (so it also
runs from a console), but is
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
So, if you leave your sources.list with testing then after the
release, you will continue to see package upgrades as things move from
unstable to testing. If you use etch then when Etch becomes stable,
you will only see security updates.
Regards,
-Roberto
Wait,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:15:25AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
Wait, so stable only gets security updates? What if there's a
bug in a package, will it get a fix? And I guess just to finish
off my questionnaire, do packages in stable ever get upgrades
for additional functionality?
Stable
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:15:25AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
If stable only gets security updates, then I find it rather
funny that I know someone running a Debian system with a custom
perl script designed to get only security updates via apt-get.
Was this script a total waste of his
2007/2/14, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
I personally think that if you want the latest greatest
stuff one should run sid instead of testing. If something breaks in
sid, it tends to fix itself pretty quickly.
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 10:15 -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
So, if you leave your sources.list with testing then after the
release, you will continue to see package upgrades as things move from
unstable to testing. If you use etch then when Etch becomes stable,
you
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:15:25AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
Wait, so stable only gets security updates? What if there's a
bug in a package, will it get a fix? And I guess just to finish
off my questionnaire, do packages in stable ever get upgrades
for additional
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 11:36 -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
Hi Debian gurus,
I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
Etch.
Hi Debian gurus,
I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
Etch. Since I'm still pretty new to Debian, I'm a little iffy when it
Hi,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael S. Peek[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what if what I want is to keep our machines at testing? It seems to
have the latest and grooviest versions of stuff. So how badly would I be
shooting myself in the foot if I changed etch to testing in
Andy Hawkins wrote:
That would be just fine. As I understand it, stuff doesn't make it from
unstable to testing until it's been working in unstable for a while, so the
chances of testing breaking horribly are reduced.
It can still happen though, so there's a possibility that in the early
stages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael S. Peek wrote:
Okay, so, just to make sure that I understand completely. Once Etch
becomes the new stable release, does the unstable release replace the
testing release? I.e. if I leave my systems at testing, will I come
in one day and
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
Okay, so, just to make sure that I understand completely. Once Etch
becomes the new stable release, does the unstable release replace the
testing release? I.e. if I leave my systems at testing, will I come
in one day and
Hi,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael S. Peek[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so, just to make sure that I understand completely. Once Etch
becomes the new stable release, does the unstable release replace the
testing release? I.e. if I leave my systems at testing, will I
I've seen several warnings now about making sure to change testing to
etch in /etc/apt/sources.lst once Etch goes stable. (For testing
purposes I've just always left it etch.) But what if what I want is
to keep our machines at testing? It seems to have the latest and
grooviest versions
Joe writes:
However, since Etch has been frozen, there are a lot of packages from Sid
that are ready for Testing, but can't go there. Lenny will catch them
when it is created, thus it is possible that the large number of packages
flowing in could cause some stability problems.
Don't forget,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
Andy Hawkins wrote:
That would be just fine. As I understand it, stuff doesn't make it from
unstable to testing until it's been working in unstable for a while, so
the
chances of testing breaking horribly are reduced.
It can
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
Hi Debian gurus,
I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
Etch.
Joe Hart wrote:
According to the documentation, when Etch is made stable, a new testing
will be made (in this case called Lenny), which is a direct clone of
Etch. Packages will migrate from Sid to Lenny at the same pace as usual
for the testing distro.
However, since Etch has been frozen,
On 2-nov-2005, at 21:37, Thomas wrote:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:44:34AM +, s. keeling wrote:
Cameron Matheson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
/etc/aliases. It's unsafe to let root receive mail, so generally
Uh, what? Why's it unsafe to let root receive email?
I agree it's _better_ for root's mail to be aliased to a real
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too complicated. The howtos i
Thomas wrote:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too
Thomas wrote:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos
Thomas schreef:
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or
pop3
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed
On 23:49 Wed 02 Nov , Thomas wrote:
snip
Is there a logfile or something that can tell me who is actually
denying what?
Thanks,
Thomas
Aha, i found out:
mail.log
Nov 2 23:26:50 localhost postfix/smtpd[14343]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from nova[10.0.0.2]: 554 [EMAIL
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:37:10PM +0100, Thomas wrote:
Here my /etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU)
biff = no
# appending .domain is the MUA's job.
append_dot_mydomain = no
# Uncomment the next line to generate delayed mail warnings
Cameron Matheson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
/etc/aliases. It's unsafe to let root receive mail, so generally
Uh, what? Why's it unsafe to let root receive email?
I agree it's _better_ for root's mail to be aliased to a real user,
but safer too? Why?
--
Any technology distinguishable
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can receive
email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3 (imap would
be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they seemed way too
complicated. The howtos i saw included spamfilters, anitivr software
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too complicated. The howtos i saw included spamfilters,
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can receive
email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3 (imap would
be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they seemed way too
complicated. The howtos i saw included spamfilters,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:31:30PM -0600, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can receive
email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3 (imap would
be nice). I have seen some howtos on
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too complicated. The howtos i
Raphaël SurcouF Bordet wrote:
Le dimanche 15 août 2004 à 13:35 +0200, TRISTRAM Herve a écrit :
pour killer la couche graphique, un CTRL+ALT+RETOUR ARRIERE suffit
généralement. Attention pas SUPP à la place de retour sinon ta machine
risque de redémarrer !
le probleme c que si tu te loggue
Salut
J'ai 1 config basé sur 1 Knoppix upgradée testing, servant de firewall
et autre, dont je désire virer toute la partie graphique, qui ne doit
plus me servir..., normalement :) ?
1- Par curiosité, comment fait-on pour 'tomber' en console, sans la
partie graphique donc ? Note : ai bien
Le 15/08/04 à 12:32, Mezig écrivait:
1- Par curiosité, comment fait-on pour 'tomber' en console, sans la
partie graphique donc ? Note : ai bien essayé Ctrl F1 et Ctrl F2, mais
ça ne marche pas... :( ?
Pour booter en mode console, faire:
knoppix 2 au lancement du cdrom
ou modifier la ligne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le dimanche 15 Août 2004 12:32, Mezig a écrit :
Salut
Salut,
J'ai 1 config basé sur 1 Knoppix upgradée testing, servant de firewall
et autre, dont je désire virer toute la partie graphique, qui ne doit
plus me servir..., normalement :) ?
1-
Le dimanche 15 aoû 2004 à 12 h 32, Mezig prit sa plus fine plume pour
écrire:
Salut
J'ai 1 config basé sur 1 Knoppix upgradée testing, servant de
firewall et autre, dont je désire virer toute la partie graphique,
qui ne doit plus me servir..., normalement :) ?
oui
1- Par curiosité,
Le Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:00:11 +0200, Mezig a écrit :
J'ai 1 config basé sur 1 Knoppix upgradée testing, servant de firewall
et autre, dont je désire virer toute la partie graphique, qui ne doit
plus me servir..., normalement :) ?
1- Par curiosité, comment fait-on pour 'tomber' en console,
Salut,
pour killer la couche graphique, un CTRL+ALT+RETOUR ARRIERE suffit
généralement. Attention pas SUPP à la place de retour sinon ta machine
risque de redémarrer !
le probleme c que si tu te loggue en mode graphique, la mire de loggin
graphique va revenir. Je ne peux pas te dire comment
TRISTRAM Herve wrote:
Salut,
pour killer la couche graphique, un CTRL+ALT+RETOUR ARRIERE suffit
généralement. Attention pas SUPP à la place de retour sinon ta machine
risque de redémarrer !
le probleme c que si tu te loggue en mode graphique, la mire de loggin
graphique va revenir. Je ne
Le dimanche 15 août 2004 à 13:35 +0200, TRISTRAM Herve a écrit :
pour killer la couche graphique, un CTRL+ALT+RETOUR ARRIERE suffit
généralement. Attention pas SUPP à la place de retour sinon ta machine
risque de redémarrer !
le probleme c que si tu te loggue en mode graphique, la mire de
I am trying to setup apache + mod_perl, and I need the libperl-dev
package. However, using aptitude, I get the sweet 404 message.
I see the security messages on the debian website, about how it was
compromised (old news now) so in the meantime: where can I get packages?
Can I point the apt* to
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:25:24AM -0500, James Garvin wrote:
I am trying to setup apache + mod_perl, and I need the libperl-dev
package. However, using aptitude, I get the sweet 404 message.
I see the security messages on the debian website, about how it was
compromised (old news now) so
Colin Watson wrote:
The archive servers are up, and have been for weeks. I'm mystified:
please go into more detail about the error you're seeing.
See this link: http://packages.debian.org/stable/
it says: packages.debian.org is down at the moment.
However, I found another user's post which
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:04:04PM -0500, Jim Garvin wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
The archive servers are up, and have been for weeks. I'm mystified:
please go into more detail about the error you're seeing.
See this link: http://packages.debian.org/stable/
it says: packages.debian.org is
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
