Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
I tried gocr and the result was quite miserable. Then I tried with MS
Windows
and it was almost perfect. Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software
under
Linux is very poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for
that:
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
I tried gocr and the result was quite miserable. Then I tried with MS Windows
and it was almost perfect. Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software
under
Linux is very poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for
that: unfortunately my test seems
Rodolfo Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse the basic question:
I wish to scan a printed text so to have it in an editable text file.
How can I do that with `sane' and `scanimage'?
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:57:03AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
Scanners scan to image formats. To get
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software under Linux is very
poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for that:
unfortunately my test seems to confirm that. What do you Debian
listers think?
I think you should check out these articles.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:10:27PM +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software under Linux is very
poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for that:
unfortunately my test seems to confirm that. What do you Debian
listers
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
I tried gocr and the result was quite miserable. Then I tried with MS Windows
and it was almost perfect. Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software
under
Linux is very poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for
that: unfortunately my test seems
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
[...]
I installed tesseract with configure, make, make install, then tried to run it
but got the following error message:
Unable to load unicharset file /usr/local/share/tessdata/eng.unicharset
. In the README file there is:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Why not use the Debian package? It is called tesseract-ocr.
Yes. But it is old 1.02 version and has FTBFS bug.
If anyone here is interesed to help maintain update with
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Why not use the Debian package? It is called tesseract-ocr.
Yes. But it is old 1.02 version and has FTBFS bug.
Yes,
Nelson Castillo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Why not use the Debian package? It is called
On 7/21/07, Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nelson Castillo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Why not
If you install as stated above with aptitude, tesseract-ocr-data is
automatically installed unless you change default behavior of aptitude.
FTBFS is just package issue. This package should work. Otherwise,
please file bug report.
Osamu, thanks a lot. The package works well.
Sorry -- if I was
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:54:40PM -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
On 7/21/07, Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nelson Castillo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On
13 matches
Mail list logo
