OT: Is pgp 2.6.X considered old?

I just installed pgp last night, read some mail this AM, and got a need newer pgp version message from a tagged post. I haven't used pgp before, so don't know if the older version is considered really old now. Can someone toss the answer to this my way, please? TIA, Kenward

Re: OT: Is pgp 2.6.X considered old?

On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 11:41:12 -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote: I just installed pgp last night, read some mail this AM, and got a need newer pgp version message from a tagged post. I haven't used pgp before, so don't know if the older version is considered really old now. More or less. You

Re: OT: Is pgp 2.6.X considered old?

Thanks for the quick replies. There is no pgp link to pgp5. I see a set of executable links from the manpage. Mutt expects pgp. What is the best approach to integrate these together? Kenward On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote: Kenward == Kenward Vaughan

Re: OT: Is pgp 2.6.X considered old?

On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 12:35:32PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote: Thanks for the quick replies. There is no pgp link to pgp5. I see a set of executable links from the manpage. Mutt expects pgp. What is the best approach to integrate these together? ... Never mind, folks. I just FTFM...