Fwd: Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-12 Thread steef
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: OT: Viruses on lists Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 09:45:51 +0200 From: steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Monday 10 May 2004 22:22, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > Paul Johnson had the gall to say: > > "Derrick &#

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-12 Thread steef
On Monday 10 May 2004 22:22, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > Paul Johnson had the gall to say: > > "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [snip] > > > > Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager > > > (mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one mur

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > My choice is to simply drop viruses. I don't expect to have any legit >> > messages falsely identified as viral, and dropping the message simply >> > removes waste from the network bandwidth and disk

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:06:43PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager > (mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one murphy is > running). The list manager then counts that against you in its > determination of whic

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:22:41PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > Paul Johnson had the gall to say: > > "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [snip] > > > Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager > > > (mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know wha

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:22:41PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote: | Paul Johnson had the gall to say: | > "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | [snip] | > > Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager | > > (mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know wha

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Jonathan Matthews
Paul Johnson had the gall to say: > "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] > > Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list manager > > (mailman, majordomo, ezmlm, etc. - I don't know what one murphy is > > running). The list manager then counts that against you

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Paul Johnson
"Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Since the mail has already been received and accepted by murphy, am > | I just pushing the sending of spoofed bounce messages one stage back > | up the email processing ladder? > > Almost. murphy generates a bounce and sends it to the list m

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-10 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:59:45AM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote: | Evenin' all. | | I've installed ClamAV+Exim4 to reject viruses at SMTP time. d-u's | headers don't seem to mention anything about /virus/ scanning (as | opposed to SpamAssassin), so I guess I'm ok asking this question here: |

Re: OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-09 Thread Paul Johnson
Jonathan Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm fine with (a) - I think that still holds - but is (b) incorrect when > dealing with listmail? I don't believe so. I do it. > Since the mail has already been received and accepted by murphy, am > I just pushing the sending of spoofed bounce me

OT: Viruses on lists

2004-05-09 Thread Jonathan Matthews
Evenin' all. I've installed ClamAV+Exim4 to reject viruses at SMTP time. d-u's headers don't seem to mention anything about /virus/ scanning (as opposed to SpamAssassin), so I guess I'm ok asking this question here: The whole point of having virus scanning while the sender still has an open c