On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 16:45, Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Thanks, I will start enumerating the differences between OpenOffice and
LibreOffice here:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 16:45, Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Thanks, I will start enumerating the differences between OpenOffice and
LibreOffice here:
http://dotancohen.com/eng/difference_openoffice_libreoffice.html
That's
...Reposted to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org
Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: OT Apache Open Office
To: Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com
[ no idea whether you intented to send a PM, but.. ]
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:53
On 11/03/12 22:09, Greg Madden wrote:
I have been using dev builds, now rc's, of AOO for a while now. For
my work,
archived documents templates this is working out better, for my use
scenario,
than LO ver 3.4.x and later.
There are differences between AOO LO, significant enough to
Chris Davies chris-use...@roaima.co.uk wrote:
I've found the converse to be true, particularly with templated
documents. At one point I found that I could open templated documents
with LO but in order to print them I had to save then in native OOo
format and reload them in AOO. Fortunately
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:09, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gci.net wrote:
Look at the referenced bug reports, there are attachments to the reports
showing
what has happened to my templates archived docs. others have noticed this
also.
Thanks, I will start enumerating the differences between
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Thanks, I will start enumerating the differences between OpenOffice and
LibreOffice here:
http://dotancohen.com/eng/difference_openoffice_libreoffice.html
That's going to be one hell of a moving target. What audience are you trying
Greg Madden gomadtr...@gci.net wrote:
1. About 'file open' : Someone mentioned LO has a stricter compliance
with ? document format standards, anecdotal experience shows some
MS docs do not open in LO that do open in AOO. Not really an area of
concern here, I rarely get a MS document sent to
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:09:10 -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
I have been using dev builds, now rc's, of AOO for a while now. For my
work, archived documents templates this is working out better, for my
use scenario, than LO ver 3.4.x and later.
What are those improvements you're seeing?
There
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 23:09, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gci.net wrote:
There are differences between AOO LO, significant enough to warrant having a
choice in Debian of which one to use.
What are the significant differences that you have perceived? I might
have to maintain a page outlining the
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 06:36:52PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
Someone will have to step up and put the work in to package AOO, for the
choice to exist in Debian.
The Apache OO folks do provide .deb files with desktop integration. In my
tests
these work well enough on a Debian stable
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:00:26AM +, Chris Davies wrote:
documents. At one point I found that I could open templated documents
with LO but in order to print them I had to save then in native OOo
format and reload them in AOO. Fortunately that state of affairs lasted
This is nonsense. This
On Monday 12 March 2012 11:30:19 am Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 23:09, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gci.net wrote:
There are differences between AOO LO, significant enough to warrant
having a choice in Debian of which one to use.
What are the significant differences that you have
I have been using dev builds, now rc's, of AOO for a while now. For my work,
archived documents templates this is working out better, for my use scenario,
than LO ver 3.4.x and later.
There are differences between AOO LO, significant enough to warrant having a
choice in Debian of which one
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:09:10PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
I have been using dev builds, now rc's, of AOO for a while now. For my work,
archived documents templates this is working out better, for my use
scenario,
than LO ver 3.4.x and later.
That's interesting. Do you mean there are
On Sunday 11 March 2012 3:27:51 pm Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:09:10PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
I have been using dev builds, now rc's, of AOO for a while now. For my
work, archived documents templates this is working out better, for my
use scenario, than LO ver 3.4.x
16 matches
Mail list logo
