Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-30 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:11:26PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > Note this bit from the "apt-get --compile source ${pnam}${pver}" > command: >Need to get 647kB of source archives. >Get:1 http://mirrors.kernel.org sarge/main gqview 1.0.2-1 (dsc) >

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:26, Pigeon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > Here's how I do it: > > # apt-get source gqview=1.0.2-1 > > # export CC=gcc-3.2 -Wall -O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro > > # apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1 > > # dpkg -i gqview.deb > >

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-30 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 07:42, Andreas J Guelzow wrote: > Pigeon wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] > apt-get --compile source > > is supposed to download the source and > > apt-get --compile source > > is supposed to download it and compile it. You

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-30 Thread Andreas J Guelzow
Pigeon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > >>Here's how I do it: >># apt-get source gqview=1.0.2-1 >># export CC=gcc-3.2 -Wall -O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro >># apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1 >># dpkg -i gqview.deb >> alternatively: >># apt-get --compile source

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-29 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Here's how I do it: > # apt-get source gqview=1.0.2-1 > # export CC=gcc-3.2 -Wall -O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro > # apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1 > # dpkg -i gqview.deb > alternatively: > # apt-get --compile source gqview=1.0.2-1

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-26 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 12:14, Pigeon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:43:44PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > Having put appropriate deb-src

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-25 Thread Pigeon
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:43:44PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD > > > images or websi

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-25 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 23:43, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD > > > images or websites as approp

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-25 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote: > > Hi, > > > [snip] > > > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD > > images or websites as appropriate, have I got this sequence right? > > > > apt-get sourc

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-23 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:22:44PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote: > > Hi, > > > [snip] > > > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD > > images or websites as appropriate, have I got this sequence right? > > > > apt-get sourc

Re: Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-23 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:17, Pigeon wrote: > Hi, > [snip] > > Having put appropriate deb-src lines in sources.list, pointing to CD > images or websites as appropriate, have I got this sequence right? > > apt-get source --download-only whatever # get source package > dpkg-source -x whatever.dsc

Oh no, what a really heavy bummer

2003-01-23 Thread Pigeon
Hi, Having installed woody I'm now wanting to compile stuff that is used a lot and/or is CPU-intensive (C libraries, shell, gcc, gzip...) optimised for my CPU. I've done the kernel and X already; gcc has gone from egcs-2.91.66 to gcc-2.95.4; definitely looks slower than with slink. With all my wo