Hello *,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Colin wrote:
Matthijs wrote:
When, and for what reasons, will Etch become frozen?
See above for when but it's the project leader that ultimately determines
when etch is good enough to be released.
Uhm, no, it's the release managers'
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Colin wrote:
Matthijs wrote:
How long will Etch be in testing?
When are the next summer olympics? ;-)
But seriously, the next release shouldn't take nearly as long as sarge
because the number of supported architectures are being reduced from
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:23:21PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
Also, no new installer this time, which eliminates what I perceive to have
been the biggest bottleneck.
How was the installer a bottleneck? AFAIK it was ready to go weeks
before sarge was released. Just curious.
--
Angelina Carlton
On Thursday 09 Jun 2005 23:25, Angelina Carlton wrote:
How was the installer a bottleneck? AFAIK it was ready to go weeks
before sarge was released. Just curious.
Not sure myself, but I'm guessing the installer held things back for a long
time, and while that was happening, people decided to
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Angelina Carlton wrote:
How was the installer a bottleneck? AFAIK it was ready to go weeks
before sarge was released. Just curious.
The only problem I had with the network installer is that it was not able
to find the sites to download the necessary files from. Then
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:25:48PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:23:21PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
Also, no new installer this time, which eliminates what I perceive to have
been the biggest bottleneck.
How was the installer a bottleneck? AFAIK it was ready to
According to Steve Block,
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 06:22:38PM -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
For me, also being rather new to Debian, this raises another question.
Currently, I am running an unstable machine (I have unstable in
sources.list). I will probably keep that. I'm just curious: If someone
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 02:40:11 +0200, Steve Block [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 06:22:38PM -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
For me, also being rather new to Debian, this raises another question.
Currently, I am running an unstable machine (I have unstable in
sources.list). I will
Matthijs wrote:
How long will Etch be in testing?
When are the next summer olympics? ;-)
But seriously, the next release shouldn't take nearly as long as sarge
because the number of supported architectures are being reduced from eleven
to four. They are aiming for a 12 to 18 month release
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Colin wrote:
But seriously, the next release shouldn't take nearly as long as sarge
because the number of supported architectures are being reduced from eleven
to four. They are aiming for a 12 to 18 month release cycle.
Also, no new installer this
becomes stable (like tomorrow), and I execute apt-get update, am I going to
be ugrading all of my applications to the Sarge level? Do I need to do
something to keep my Woody install at a Woody level and still use apt-get
update/upgrade?
Once Sarge becomes stable, what happens to the Woody I have
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 the mental interface of
Robert Cates told:
Hi all,
not being with Debian long enough to have gone through this before, I'm
wanting
to know what I need to do to my current Woody installation (ie, source.list
file) to keep using apt-get update/upgrade.(?)
Just put in
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 the mental interface of
Robert Cates told:
Hi all,
not being with Debian long enough to have gone through this before, I'm wanting
to know what I need to do to my current Woody installation (ie, source.list
file) to keep using apt-get
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 11:09 +0100, Wulfy wrote:
Wouldn't that cause an upgrade to Sarge?
Change your sources.list file:
For your woody installed machine use woody not stable, and for your
sarge installed machine use sarge not testing...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:58:52AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 the mental interface of
Robert Cates told:
Hi all,
not being with Debian long enough to have gone through this before, I'm
wanting
to know what I need to do to my current Woody installation
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 the mental interface of
Roberto C. Sanchez told:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:58:52AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 the mental interface of
Robert Cates told:
Hi all,
not being with Debian long enough to have gone through this before, I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I'll have to disagree on this. I think it is always better to
specifically name the ditribution you want to track in sources.list.
For example, woody, sarge, sid, etc.
It is much more apparent, that way, what the
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:22:38 -0400
Rick Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I'll have to disagree on this. I think it is always better to
specifically name the ditribution you want to track in sources.list.
For
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 06:22:38PM -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
For me, also being rather new to Debian, this raises another question.
Currently, I am running an unstable machine (I have unstable in
sources.list). I will probably keep that. I'm just curious: If someone
has sid in sources.list,
19 matches
Mail list logo
