Hi,
> > debian-ment...@lists.debian.org.
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> ok. I'll follow up on that mailing list.
Start:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2015/08/msg00320.html
Latest state:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2015/08/msg00377.html
I meanwhile uploaded to
http://mento
On Friday 21 August 2015 12:37:44 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > > "All packages must be signed with the GnuPG key"
> >
> > Either "dpkg-buildpackage without -us -uc" or debsign applied to
> > the changes file.
>
> Will try. And also the proposal to use debuild instead of
> dpkg-buildpackage, wh
Hi,
Dominique Dumon wrote:
> https://ddumont.wordpress.com/2015/05/31/improving-update-of-existing-debian
copyright-file/
This will be of help when i expand my work to packages
where i am not the upstream.
For my own ones i rather seem to know too much about the
license situation of their various
On Thursday 20 August 2015 01:02:32 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> If it is not too daring, then i would propose this roadmap
> for refurbishing the burner corner of Debian:
>
> - I learn what kind of signing is meant with
> http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> "All packages must be sign
On Wednesday 19 August 2015 19:38:16 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> I see. The man page effect again.
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#copyright
You can also use "cme update dpkg-copyright" to update debian/copyright file.
See [1] for more details.
[1]
https://ddumont.wor
Hi,
George Danchev wrote:
> I just orphaned the three packages: libburn, libisofs, libisoburn.
> The team has been mostly one-man for a couple of years, but eventually I run
> out of time, energy, and burning hardware to properly maintain these
> packages.
I thought you did this already. Else i w
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>assumed i can build Debian package files of three existing
>orphaned Debian packages with current upstream release on
>Debian 8.1 - where to ask the following questions:
>
>- What more do i have to set up for making them ready
> for submission to a sponsor ? Sid ?
>
>
On Wednesday 19 August 2015 19:54:11 Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 August 2015 19:58:21 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > assumed i can build Debian package files of three existing
> > orphaned Debian packages with current upstream release on
> > Debian 8.1 - where to ask the following questions:
Hi,
David Wright wrote:
> Why would I want a character that doesn't behave as a space to be
> displayed as a normal space?
That's the question about the use case.
I don't have one. So i made Alt+Spacebar behave like Spacebar.
But the typographical purpose of NO-BREAK SPACE is to look
like space
Hi,
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hmm, libburn is marked as "help wanted" [1]. I could not find any bug in
> wnpp [2] marking is as orphan. Where did you get the info that this
> package is orphaned ?
Sorry for the lack of proper Debian terminology.
My upstream packages are de facto unmaintained bec
On Tuesday 18 August 2015 19:58:21 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> assumed i can build Debian package files of three existing
> orphaned Debian packages with current upstream release on
> Debian 8.1 - where to ask the following questions:
>
> i fetched the Debian source and ran dch
>
> apt-get source l
Hi,
i wrote:
> > License: GPL-3
> >The source code is GPL-2-or-later. By linking with GPL-3 licensed
> >libreadline.so.6 the resulting binaries become GPL-3 licensed, too.
Don Armstrong wrote:
> debian/copyright documents the license of the source code, not license
> the resultant binar
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Regardless, you just express the full set of licenses in
> > debian/copyright. The effective set of licenses of the binary isn't
> > something you have to deal with (luckily).
>
> The FSF would contradict. If Debian links GPLv2+
Hi,
Don Armstrong wrote:
> You can also use mentors.debian.net to upload fixed
> versions of these packages so that people can review them.
I am exploring it ... while trying to silence warnings
from dh_shlibdeps about useless dependencies, and from
dpkg-gencontrol about "unknown substitution var
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> assumed i can build Debian package files of three existing
> orphaned Debian packages with current upstream release on
> Debian 8.1 - where to ask the following questions:
>
> - What more do i have to set up for making them ready
> for submission to a
Hi,
Brian wrote:
> debian-mentors looks good enough.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/ says:
"This list is not meant for users' questions, but for new maintainers'!"
Looking into the recent archives i get the impression that
i lack a glossary of debian-speak. Especially the word
"maintai
On Tue 18 Aug 2015 at 19:58:21 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> assumed i can build Debian package files of three existing
> orphaned Debian packages with current upstream release on
> Debian 8.1 - where to ask the following questions:
>
> - What more do i have to set up for making them re
Hi,
assumed i can build Debian package files of three existing
orphaned Debian packages with current upstream release on
Debian 8.1 - where to ask the following questions:
- What more do i have to set up for making them ready
for submission to a sponsor ? Sid ?
- Is an experienced packager aro
18 matches
Mail list logo
