On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Seriously, I can't read ip. I suppose that eventually I shall have to see if
if you think ip is bad, try your hand at iw (the one that replaces
iwconfig)...
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:02:23PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
ip a
ip r
The counters are not printed with those but since I think those should
be accessed using /proc (or /sys) I am not going to contribute to
pulling those from a command.
But I will.
ip --statistics link
ip -s l
On Monday 09 February 2015 20:02:23 Bob Proulx wrote:
Hey if an old school dog like me can learn to deal with 'ip' instead
of 'ifconfig' then you can too.
The problem, anyhow for me, is that ifconfig is legible and ip is not. So I
shall use ifconfig for as long as almost possible and then
On Tuesday 10 February 2015 14:57:51 Lisi Reisz wrote:
Seriously, I can't read ip.
I just had another try, and it has improved. Maybe by the time ifconfig is
finally dead or useless, ip will be useful!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
John L. Ries wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
In Linux, you should never use ifconfig for anything...
I wouldn't go that far. I think ifconfig is just fine for quickie
diagnostics; but I would never use it as a network interface configuration
tool if I could help it.
The problem
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 11:43:48PM -0500, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running Debian Jessie AMD64. I'm using RRDTool to create graphs of
my network activity. Do the byte counters in the `ifconfig` output
overflow? I imagine they have to at some point. What's the value at
which
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:02:23 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
John L. Ries wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
In Linux, you should never use ifconfig for anything...
I wouldn't go that far. I think ifconfig is just fine for quickie
diagnostics; but I would never use it
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
In Linux, you should never use ifconfig for anything...
I wouldn't go that far. I think ifconfig is just fine for quickie
diagnostics; but I would never use it as a network interface
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
I'm running Debian Jessie AMD64. I'm using RRDTool to create graphs of
my network activity. Do the byte counters in the `ifconfig` output
overflow? I imagine they have to at some point. What's the value at
which they overflow? Is it 2^64 bytes?
Hi list,
I'm running Debian Jessie AMD64. I'm using RRDTool to create graphs of
my network activity. Do the byte counters in the `ifconfig` output
overflow? I imagine they have to at some point. What's the value at
which they overflow? Is it 2^64 bytes?
Also, is there a better way to access this
Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
I'm running Debian Jessie AMD64. I'm using RRDTool to create graphs of
my network activity.
Fun!
Do the byte counters in the `ifconfig` output overflow?
Yes. Eventually.
I imagine they have to at some point. What's the value at which they
overflow? Is it 2^64
11 matches
Mail list logo
