Re: Overhead of LVM (Re: Upgrade Problem)

Hi. On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:03:48PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, January 04, 2019 08:23:59 AM Reco wrote: > > # pvs > > PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree > > /dev/md10 naslvm2 a-- 14.55t 10.43t > > > > # hdparm -Tt /dev/md10 > > /dev/md10: > >

Re: Overhead of LVM (Re: Upgrade Problem)

On Friday, January 04, 2019 08:23:59 AM Reco wrote: > # pvs > PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree > /dev/md10 naslvm2 a-- 14.55t 10.43t > > # hdparm -Tt /dev/md10 > /dev/md10: > Timing cached reads: 1224 MB in 2.00 seconds = 612.05 MB/sec > Timing buffered disk reads:

Re: Overhead of LVM (Re: Upgrade Problem)

Hi. On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:13:38AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, January 04, 2019 03:49:37 AM Andy Smith wrote: > > It's unfortunate that LVM was not used as it would make juggling > > space between the multiple filesystems a lot easier. Oh well. > > I guess I should

Overhead of LVM (Re: Upgrade Problem)

On Friday, January 04, 2019 03:49:37 AM Andy Smith wrote: > It's unfortunate that LVM was not used as it would make juggling > space between the multiple filesystems a lot easier. Oh well. I guess I should consider using LVM on my next install. Does it incur any overhead during normal disk