frustrated at the PCI modem situation.
Yes I can use a external... No problem... for me it is the idea of the
PCI internal (were I live we truly can't do DSL or cable and the phone
is just past two wire telegraph in capabilities) My Western Electric
202- E1 and 634a subset telephone seem to work fine
On 4. September 2005 at 2:01PM -0700,
Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
[...]
Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for
requiring an internal PCI modem?
Dave.
All I want it for is callerid on a sarge based myth system.
The reason I wanted
Hans du Plooy wrote :
External USB modems are often no more than the usual winmodem in a shell.
That's interesting, I did not know that.
My understanding is that a modem that has a controller will work from Linux,
with no additional driver, by being associated with an RS232 serial port.
Nuke wrote:
My understanding is that a modem that has a controller will work from Linux,
with no additional driver, by being associated with an RS232 serial port.
This is obviously the COM1 or COM2 if external. If internal, the Linux
compatible modem will also have a UART chip so it becomes
I use a Multitech MT5634ZPX-PCI. It is not a WinModem - it is quality kit
with an on board controller, which is what an internal modem needs for
Linux.
Hans du Plooy said :-
If* you manage to track them [internal modems] down, the ones that still
exsist cost aboutas much as an external
Nuke wrote:
Hans du Plooy said :-
If* you manage to track them [internal modems] down, the ones that still
exsist cost aboutas much as an external serial modem, so why not just get
one of those?
This reaction is fairly typical when internal modems are mentioned in the
Linux world,
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8? Like does newegg sell any modems that will just work
without a huge hassle of tracking down a driver or some add-on crappy
binary from some company who doesn't want to open the source to their
obsolete analog
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8?
*If* you manage to track them down, the ones that still exsist cost about
as much as an external serial modem, so why not just get one of those?
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
?
And perform much better, probably too.
Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for requiring
an internal PCI modem?
Dave.
--
Please don't CC me on list messages!
...
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All email from me is now digitally signed, key from
On Sunday 04 September 2005 06:30 am, Mike wrote:
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8? Like does newegg sell any modems that will just work
without a huge hassle of tracking down a driver or some add-on crappy
binary from some company who doesn't
Mike wrote:
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8?
I agree with Bob. I'd get a USR 5610B modem if you must have a PCI
modem. They're fairly pricey but it's worth the money.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:30 am, Mike wrote:
Is there any PCI modems that will just work with a stock debian sarge
kernel 2.6.8?
Sufficiently ground, most internal modems will make some pretty horrible
coffee, but still better than they do a modem. Just get a plain old external
serial
not just get one of
those?
And perform much better, probably too.
Perhaps the original poster should explain his motivation for requiring
an internal PCI modem?
Dave.
All I want it for is callerid on a sarge based myth system.
The reason I wanted a PCI modem was because I just got done
Hallo,
ich habe dass gleiche Problem. Wo hast Du einen
Treiber gefunden, oder unter welcher Bezeichnung findet man etwas über dieses
Modem?
Für Hilfe wäre ich sehr dankbar
Volpert
Hallo,
Am Sonntag, 07. Nov 2004, 10:01:38 +0100 schrieb Volpert v. Schwertzell:
ich habe dass gleiche Problem. Wo hast Du einen Treiber
gefunden, oder unter welcher Bezeichnung findet man etwas
über dieses Modem?
Welches vorige Problem? Welches Modem?
http://linmodems.org
Hi,
ich finde leider das vorrige Posting nicht in der ML und kann dir deshalb nur pauschal
etwas über ein PCI-Modem unter Linux sagen. Es ist nämlich so, dass PCI-Modems sehr
oft s.g. WinModems sind, mit abgespeckten Chips deren Aufgabe dann von
CPU/Windows/Treiber übernommen wird. Schau ma
Hallo,
ich habe auch so ein Modem allerdings ohne Treiber.
Kann mir jemand sagen von welchem Hersteller das Ding ist, oder mir direkt den Treiber schicken ?
Besten Dank
Uli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ich habe auch so ein Modem
no references in article
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL
hello,
i am having difficulties installing an pci modem with setserial and the
2.6 kernel.
it seems that the name(s) of the serial modules have changed from 2.2.x,
2.4.x to the 2.6.x series. what used to be serial is now 8250 and
8250-pci, etc.
the (relevant) contents of /etc/modutils/setserial
Hi folks--
I'm trying to add a modem to a Dell Precision 410 running debian
testing on top of Linux 2.2.6
One think I can't figure out is its device--/dev/ttyS??.
lspci -vv reports:
:00:10.0 Serial controller: 5610 56K FaxModem 56K FaxModem Model
5610 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [16550])
Hi,
Mit nem 3 in 1 Stecker (NFN-F-Adapter) in der Wandbuchse gings bei
mir. Wobei ich nicht verstanden habe, warum das was ändert; egal
hauptsache es klappt.
Die dreifach-TAE-Dose (zumindest die originale von Telekom) hat in den
N-Buchsen so Art Schalter, die öffnen, wenn man einen Stecker
* Holger Wansing [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2004-06-05 10:55 +0200:
Hi,
Mit nem 3 in 1 Stecker (NFN-F-Adapter) in der Wandbuchse gings bei
mir. Wobei ich nicht verstanden habe, warum das was ändert; egal
hauptsache es klappt.
Die dreifach-TAE-Dose (zumindest die originale von Telekom) hat
Hallo zusammen,
ich hab hier so ein Danaer-Geschenk in die Hand gedrueckt bekommen:
ein Modem 80130010002 Typ: V.90 HAM PCI 56k CE0682X
P20401000300 mit Ambient MD5628D-L-A U34T33TC00-11140G 9949 A
Taiwan Chip, wenn ich alles richtig lesen konnte. Kennt sich damit
vielleicht jemand aus?
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2004-06-04 16:07 +0200:
Hallo zusammen,
ich hab hier so ein Danaer-Geschenk in die Hand gedrueckt bekommen:
ein Modem 80130010002 Typ: V.90 HAM PCI 56k CE0682X
P20401000300 mit Ambient MD5628D-L-A U34T33TC00-11140G 9949 A
Taiwan Chip, wenn ich alles
Andre Berger schrieb:
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2004-06-04 16:07 +0200:
Hallo zusammen,
ich hab hier so ein Danaer-Geschenk in die Hand gedrueckt bekommen:
ein Modem 80130010002 Typ: V.90 HAM PCI 56k CE0682X
P20401000300 mit Ambient MD5628D-L-A U34T33TC00-11140G 9949 A
Taiwan Chip,
Hej!
Har ett CNet PCI Modem CN5614RV, dvs ett WinModem som jag försöker
få igång i Debian (unstable) utan större framgång.
Har laddat ner hsfmodem_6.03.00lnxt03091800free_i386.deb och kört
dpkg -i hsfmodem_6.03.00lnxt03091800free_i386.deb som root.
Current parameters: (hsfconfig --info
--- Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-05 at
22:38, Steve Kennedy wrote:
--- Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun,
2003-06-01 at
15:11, Steve Kennedy wrote:
Hi folks:
[snip]
Are you telling XFree which PCI device to use?
$ lspci|grep VGA
01:00.0
Hi folks:
I've just installed Woody on a brand-new box and am having problems
getting X and the modem working. I suspect these problems are
connected, and that the AGP card and modem are not being recognized.
General information:
CPU: Athlon XP 2400+
MoBo: ECS K7VTA3/KT300 v.5
Graphics card: ATI
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 15:11, Steve Kennedy wrote:
Hi folks:
I've just installed Woody on a brand-new box and am having problems
getting X and the modem working. I suspect these problems are
connected, and that the AGP card and modem are not being recognized.
General information:
CPU:
I've purchased a new US Robotics Performance Pro
modem that is guaranteed to run on Linux. According to the manual it should be
automatically detected by any kernel newer than 2.3.x. However, the modem isn't
detected.
According to what I've read in http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
I've purchased a new US Robotics Performance Pro
modem that is guaranteed to run on Linux. According to the manual it should be
automatically detected by any kernel newer than 2.3.x. However, the modem isn't
detected.
According to what I've read in http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
S Yuval wrote:
I've purchased a new US Robotics Performance Pro modem that is
guaranteed to run on Linux. According to the manual it should be
automatically detected by any kernel newer than 2.3.x. However, the
modem isn't detected.
According to what I've read in
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 12:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:55:48AM -0500, alex wrote:
I'm interested in the Walmart/Microtel computers that come without
software but I'm wondering about their PCI modem.
I understand that some PCI modems can be adapted for use
I'm interested in the Walmart/Microtel computers that come without
software but I'm wondering about their PCI modem.
I understand that some PCI modems can be adapted for use in Linux but
what I'd like to know is
if once the PCI modem is adapted for Linux, can it still be used in
other
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:55:48AM -0500, alex wrote:
I'm interested in the Walmart/Microtel computers that come without
software but I'm wondering about their PCI modem.
I understand that some PCI modems can be adapted for use in Linux but
what I'd like to know is
if once the PCI modem
=?iso-8859-1?q?Steve=20Kieu?= wrote:
Hi,
I found from linmodems.org that sm56 is supported; and
follow the link i got the motorola page but it says
there are two types and they only have driver for
Motorola SM56 PCI modem (not speaker). I dont know if
I could use this driver ;
If anyone has
I've used the Motorola SM56 PCI modem when I was
still using
Is your modem is SM56 PCI or SM56 PCI Speaker ?
my friend's has the word speaker that is why I was
wondering if it works with that driver. Anyway he
bought it bundled with the computer, so ..
About winmodem, I am using lucent
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:49:11AM +1100, Steve Kieu wrote:
Hi,
I found from linmodems.org that sm56 is supported; and
follow the link i got the motorola page but it says
there are two types and they only have driver for
Motorola SM56 PCI modem (not speaker). I dont know if
I could use
Hi,
I found from linmodems.org that sm56 is supported; and
follow the link i got the motorola page but it says
there are two types and they only have driver for
Motorola SM56 PCI modem (not speaker). I dont know if
I could use this driver ;
If anyone has used or any experience on that matter
Hi,
I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
cat /proc/pci pci.txt
Looking at the file I see that the system see the card on IRQ 5 but,
I don't see any port address. can someone tell me how to get
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
| I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
| cat /proc/pci pci.txt
| Looking at the file I see that the system see the card on IRQ 5
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
| I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
| cat /proc/pci pci.txt
| Looking
].
followed by the next entry
Thanks for the help.
Wayne
Slaven Peles wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
| I excuted the following command
:
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 10:03, dman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:45:16AM -0400, Wayne wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm trying to get a PCI modem working on a Redhat 7.1 distribution.
| I excuted the following command to see where the system saw the card.
| cat /proc/pci pci.txt
| Looking
Hi,
I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
modem, no linux :(
Aaron
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:59:20PM +0100, Aaron Hess wrote:
I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
modem, no linux :(
Since you're not telling WHAT problems, I can hardly
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:59:20PM +0100, Aaron Hess wrote:
Hi,
I have recently installed debian on my computer and am
having big problems installing my SupraExpress Diamond
56i V pro modem. Please could someone help me (no
modem, no linux :(
Make sure your modem is supported. Take a look
. This list has been helpful
in the past, so I am trying here first. I posted when I was
planning this network, at least two years ago. It is now an
actuality.
3Com/USR 2977 PCI modem.
I would like to hear from anyone who has one of these running
under Debian. On the Inet
Thanks for the pointers I got if figured out
- Original Message -
From: Ronald L. Chichester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: Internal PCI modem with Potato
Mark Scott wrote:
Hello
Hello all
I am having trouble getting my linux to recognise my pci internal modem. I
am new to the Intel platform but have succesfully managed to install potato
on my m68k mac and connect using ppp albeit with an external modem.
I have searched the archives and was not able to find any pointers
was entitled Going Linux, Part 3,: Choosing a Modem for Linux by
Tom Moran. In it, he discusses getting a PCI modem going in Linux. The article
wasn't (too) distro specific, so you should be able to figure it out. I got a
PCI modem going in Mandrake and RedHat recently.
Good luck,
Ron
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:40:51PM -, Mark Scott wrote:
Hello all
I am having trouble getting my linux to recognise my pci internal modem. I
am new to the Intel platform but have succesfully managed to install potato
on my m68k mac and connect using ppp albeit with an external modem.
I've bought computer parts through compuplus and built a computer
for me. I have, in my opinion, a weird problem.
Modem is (from output of lspci -v) Serial controller: US
Robotics/3Com 56K FaxModem Model 5610 (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [16550])
Subsystem: US Robotics/3Com USR 56k
My roommate has a PCI modem as well, though it's made by ESS not Wisecom..
supposedly it's not a Winmodem, but who can really tell.
assigned to a serial device. Do the following:
1. make sure you have pciutils installed.
Check
2. run lspci -v and look for a reference to the serial
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Curtis Hogg wrote:
buckmi
buckmi 4. reboot.
buckmi
buckmi Done, but modem still doesn't respond to anything.
buckmi
buckmi
buckmi Any other ideas?
buckmi
buckmi -- Curtis Hogg
to see if it is a winmodem or not i'd email the company that makes it and
ask them what to
One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
modem?
From last compilation I found out in
/proc/pci
a line like
communication card
but vendor and chip data are unknown.
Have someone suggestions?
Thanks.
PS
WINmodem ?
Matth
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) wrote:
One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
modem?
From last compilation I found out in
/proc/pci
a line like
communication card
Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) writes:
One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
modem?
From last compilation I found out in
/proc/pci
a line like
communication card
but vendor and chip data
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Roso Giuseppe (Beppe) wrote:
One of my friends have a Wisecom intenal (PCI) Modem.
Someone can explain me which module I must include in kernel to use this
modem?
--
I believe most of the Wisecom modems were LT (Lucent Technologies) Winmodems.
The Wisecom site
this information.
Would you please name other PCI modems that can be made usable
under Linux? I have been told that only Multitech has a PCI modem
that is not a WinModem, (i.e., a modem where the details of
critical functionality are kept propriatary
I was just given a PCI modem by a friend of mine and he calims it's a PNP
modem but not a winmodem. I hope he's right, but I don't know how to tell
if it's a winmodem. Debian sees the modem when I cat /proc/pci and calls
it a serial interface card (same thing windows calls it until you give
*ALL* PCI modems I have seen are windows modems (winmodem is actually a USR tm).
At least you did not pay for it (-:
that there isn't yet support for PCI modems. I
expect that since modems seem to be going this way in general that sooner or
later
someone will get device support finished for them. I'm not sure if anyone's
working on
this or not.
Robert Rati wrote:
I was just given a PCI modem by a friend of mine
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Robert Rati wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:12:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Rati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: PCI modem
Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 15:23:43 +
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-cc: recipient list
that can be made usable
under Linux? I have been told that only Multitech has a PCI modem
that is not a WinModem, (i.e., a modem where the details of
critical functionality are kept propriatary.)
--David
David Teague, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Because software support is free, timely
shaleh writes:
*ALL* PCI modems I have seen are windows modems (winmodem is actually a
USR tm).
Multitech reportedly sells a non-winmodem PCI modem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Thanks a lot Oleg. You have helped a lot of us!!
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Robert Rati wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:12:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Rati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: PCI modem
Resent-Date: Thu
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:12:27AM -0500, Robert Rati wrote:
I was just given a PCI modem by a friend of mine and he calims it's a PNP
modem but not a winmodem. I hope he's right, but I don't know how to tell
if it's a winmodem. Debian sees the modem when I cat /proc/pci and calls
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Greg Scharrer wrote:
My experience with PCI modems is that they are
likely to be winmodems. My supplier stopped selling the
ISA modems in favour of the new PCI modems, but now
is restocking ISAs. I had problems with the PCI modems
in Win 9598. Auto-locating the
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
[ snip ]
: IMO it's embarrasing that most PCI modem manufacturers are making them
: winmodems. Talk about cheap!
:
: I'm not sure this is true. The PCI modem I bought last week is linux
: incompatible; it uses shared memory instead of an I/O
the other?
:
: Multitech reportedly makes one PCI modem that is not a winmodem. So far as
: I know all others are. I'd stay away from PCI modems.
This will be difficult in the future as the ISA bus disappears - many
new PCs have no ISA slots at all.
IMO it's embarrasing that most PCI
I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
better than the other? Does the type of board slot affect capability or
performance?
Thanks for your help.
Greg Scharrer
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Greg Scharrer wrote:
I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
better than the other? Does the type of board slot affect capability or
performance?
I can't imagine that
in modems.
Ed.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Scharrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 1999 03:21
Subject: ISA vs PCI Modem
I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA
Greg Scharrer writes:
I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
better than the other?
Multitech reportedly makes one PCI modem that is not a winmodem. So far as
I know all others are. I'd
Subject: ISA vs PCI Modem
Date: Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 03:21:32AM +
In reply to:Greg Scharrer
Quoting Greg Scharrer([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one
On 23 Apr 1999, John Hasler wrote:
: Greg Scharrer writes:
: I am thinking about buying a 56k modem. I have a 28.8k modem. I know not
: to buy a Winmodem. I have seen ads for ISA and PCI modems. Is one kind
: better than the other?
:
: Multitech reportedly makes one PCI modem
reportedly makes one PCI modem that is not a winmodem. So far as
: I know all others are. I'd stay away from PCI modems.
This will be difficult in the future as the ISA bus disappears - many
new PCs have no ISA slots at all.
That's okay, we can all migrate to external modems.
Das blinkenlights
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
mothem, but it's PCI. The problem is that the system doesn't
recognize it. Windows 98 recognizes it as a modem on COM3,
using IRQ 9. I reconfigured pppd (using pppconfig) to use
ttyS2 (= MSDOS
Alex writes:
I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
modem, but it's PCI.
As far as I know, Multitech makes the only non-winmodem PCI modem.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Hi,
I had an ISA modem. I've recently bought another
mothem, but it's PCI. The problem is that the system doesn't
recognize it. Windows 98 recognizes it as a modem on COM3,
using IRQ 9. I reconfigured pppd (using pppconfig) to use
ttyS2 (= MSDOS COM 3). Then I used setserial to change the
Hi! I'm new to this list, but I've been using Debian (bo) for about eight
months. I hope you can help me with a question I haven't been able to
answer.
Can anyone point me to information about setting up a PCI modem card to
work with PPP and/or SLIP? I've been trying to find information about
Hello,
I have PCI inter modem (AOpen FM 56H) on my PC. It works well with NT
4.0, but i am not able to configure it for debian 2.0
This is what i get in /proc/pci for this modem device
Bus 0, device 10, function 0:
Serial Controller: Unknown vendor, Unknown devicec (Rev 1)
Vendir id = 1270,
On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Rakesh Mohan wrote:
I have PCI inter modem (AOpen FM 56H) on my PC. It works well with NT
4.0, but i am not able to configure it for debian 2.0
I think all of AOpen's modems are software based, like the USR WinModems.
Without the drivers (of which their are none for linux)
This morning I tried to install Debian on a system with one of
these modems and was unsuccessful in creating a PPP connection.
The BIOS initializes the modem to IRQ 9, and Win95 says it's on
COM2. So I used /dev/ttyS1 as the device name and used setserial
to change the IRQ to 9, but still no
Once again, I must be the bearer of bad tidings...
The SupraMax PCI (and all of the Supra series PCI modems) will not work
with Linux. Please search the mailing list archives for my more detailed
explanations. Several people have had trouble with these modems
(including myself). You'll either
Howdy folks,
My roommate is trying to set up Debian 2.0 on his new AMD K6-2 system
and he's run into kind of a stumbling block that I am at a loss on. We
got his Soundblaster set up fine, which is an ISA card. However, we
can't figure out how to get the modem set up. It is a plug-n-pray
I have two problems. I am running bo on both my desktop computer and my
laptop. I have been very please with both.
Problem #1:
I have recently installed a PCI modem in my desktop and the kernel doesn't
recognize the PCI device. The bios reports it as:
Simple COMM Controller (I assume
88 matches
Mail list logo
