John Hasler wrote:
> John Carline writes:
> > I had compiled both ppp and slip into the 2.2.16 kernel, and evidently
> > they didn't play well together.
>
> There is no good reason they shouldn't.
That's interesting! I'll play with it a while and see if I can figure out why
they
wouldn't work t
John Carline writes:
> I had compiled both ppp and slip into the 2.2.16 kernel, and evidently
> they didn't play well together.
There is no good reason they shouldn't.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
Just to complete my part of this thread, I found my ppp problem.
I had compiled both ppp and slip into the 2.2.16 kernel, and evidently they
didn't play
well together. The new kernel (without slip) is working well.
John
John Carline wrote:
> Sean Richardson wrote:
>
> > Well... I have contin
Sean Richardson wrote:
> Well... I have continued to play with this...switching between suse and
> debian...and have been able to partially fix the problem.
>
> By setting my wvdial baud rate down to 57600 from 115200 i get only
> 1 error in 1000 packets... which is respectable...
>
> However, I w
Well... I have continued to play with this...switching between suse and
debian...and have been able to partially fix the problem.
By setting my wvdial baud rate down to 57600 from 115200 i get only
1 error in 1000 packets... which is respectable...
However, I would still like to know why 115200 w
Hello,
I recently migrated from SuSE 6.4 to Debian potato...and I am having some
problems with my PPP connection.
Under SuSE my connection worked flawlessly and I was able to use SuSE firewall
to share it among my home network with little effort. However, under Debian I
have been unable to ge
6 matches
Mail list logo
