MoiN
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions
I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib,
non-us/non-free), and went and checked wether all the dependencies
can be
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 02:55:19AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
MoiN
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions
I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib,
non-us/non-free),
*- On 30 Dec, Bart Warmerdam wrote about Re: Packages referenced but missing
from the archive
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 02:55:19AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
MoiN
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 05:45:59PM +0100, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 02:55:19AM +0100, Ingo Saitz wrote:
MoiN
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 12:09:09AM +1100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions
I know of
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions
I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib,
non-us/non-free), and went and checked wether all the dependencies
can be satisfied. As it turns out, there are many packages
* Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fvwmconf = fvwm2 (yes! fvwm2 doesn't exist)
Martin Where is fvwm2 gone to?
It is named fvwm now, as this is now the official fvwm version (prior
to that fvwm 1.24 was the official version, and fvwm2 was a beta).
fvwm 1.24 is fvwm1 now.
Martin Schulze wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I went and grabbed all the Packages files for all the distributions
I know of (main, contrib, non-free, non-us/main, non-us/contrib,
non-us/non-free), and went and checked wether all the dependencies
can be satisfied. As it turns out,
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bugs need to be filed, though they need proper investigation.
But do you think they are release critical bugs?
If the packages can't be installed because of missing depencies it's
and release critical bug. If the depencies just are ugly (|'ed
8 matches
Mail list logo
