On 8/11/14, b-m...@gmx.ch wrote:
> On Saturday 09 August 2014 11.11:08 Gary Dale wrote:
>>
>> To preserve your archive, I'd advise PAR2 redundancy files to fix any
>> problems that may crop up. So long as your HD copies are good, you don't
>> need to go to the PAR2 files, but should one develop a
On Saturday 09 August 2014 11.11:08 Gary Dale wrote:
>
> To preserve your archive, I'd advise PAR2 redundancy files to fix any
> problems that may crop up. So long as your HD copies are good, you don't
> need to go to the PAR2 files, but should one develop a problem, you can
> fix it with the PAR2
AW wrote:
> "B. M." wrote:
> > optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
> > next 10 years :-)
>
> I've found that using lvm is a great idea. Resizing volumes is incredibly
> easy. You can even easily resize a volume to occupy a portion of a new HDD.
> So, my recommendation for new
On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, B. M. wrote:
> Le 9 août 2014 à 05:44, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
>
> > On Fri, 08 Aug 2014, B. M. wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> [snip]
> >>
> >> What do you think about the following:
> >>
> >> === SSD: ===
> >> /boot unencrypted, 300 MB
> >> / ex
Le 9 août 2014 à 05:44, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> On Fri, 08 Aug 2014, B. M. wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine
>> (testing/jessie) I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme
>> which should last for the next 10 years :-)
>
> 10 years migh
On 09/08/14 03:08 AM, B. M. wrote:
Le 9 août 2014 à 06:04, Gary Dale a écrit :
On 08/08/14 06:14 AM, B. M. wrote:
Hi all,
While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
next 10 years :-)
Th
Le 9 août 2014 à 06:04, Gary Dale a écrit :
> On 08/08/14 06:14 AM, B. M. wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
>> I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
>> next 10 years :-)
>>
>> The system looks l
On 08/08/14 06:14 AM, B. M. wrote:
Hi all,
While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
next 10 years :-)
The system looks like:
Haswell 3.4 GHz
8 GB RAM (later upgradeable up to 32 GB)
250 G
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014, B. M. wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine
> (testing/jessie) I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme
> which should last for the next 10 years :-)
10 years might be an overly optimistic expectation unless you plan on
upgradi
On 08/08/2014 03:14 AM, B. M. wrote:
While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
next 10 years :-)
The system looks like:
Haswell 3.4 GHz
8 GB RAM (later upgradeable up to 32 GB)
250 GB SSD
2
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:50:49 +0200
"B. M." wrote:
> Why should I keep /home off the SSD?
Every download, every user specific config change, goes in the /home
tree. That's a lot of writing, and some of the downloads can be quite
big.
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshoote
Le 8 août 2014 à 17:16, Steve Litt a écrit :
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:14:31 +0200
> "B. M." wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine
>> (testing/jessie) I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme
>> which should last for the next 10 years :-)
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/2014 06:14 AM, B. M. wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
> I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
> next 10 years :-)
>
> The system looks like:
>
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:14:31 +0200
"B. M." wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine
> (testing/jessie) I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme
> which should last for the next 10 years :-)
>
> The system looks like:
> Haswell 3.4 GHz
> 8 GB RAM (late
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:14:31 +0200
"B. M." wrote:
> optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
> next 10 years :-)
I've found that using lvm is a great idea. Resizing volumes is incredibly
easy. You can even easily resize a volume to occupy a portion of a new HDD.
So, my recommenda
On 8/8/14, B. M. wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
> I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for
> the
> next 10 years :-)
>
> The system looks like:
> Haswell 3.4 GHz
> 8 GB RAM (later upgradeable up to 32 GB)
Hi all,
While I'm waiting for the components of my new machine (testing/jessie)
I'm thinking about the optimal partitioning scheme which should last for the
next 10 years :-)
The system looks like:
Haswell 3.4 GHz
8 GB RAM (later upgradeable up to 32 GB)
250 GB SSD
2 TB HDD
What do you think abo
17 matches
Mail list logo
