If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web
page (http://elserv.ffm.fgan.de/~lermen) that all versions greater than
2.1.22 should be installed with the updated version of loadlin (v1.6a) due
to memory detection problems, why is Debian still distributing v1.6?
Why
BOHICA wrote:
Has anyone noticed that the frozen SLINK distribution is _exactly_ the same
as the proposed new potato distribution?
New distributions start the same as the old and diverge - I'm not sure what
you're getting at.
--
see shy jo
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, BOHICA wrote:
: If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web
: page (http://elserv.ffm.fgan.de/~lermen) that all versions greater than
: 2.1.22 should be installed with the updated version of loadlin (v1.6a) due
: to memory detection
BOHICA wrote:
If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web
page (http://elserv.ffm.fgan.de/~lermen) that all versions greater than
2.1.22 should be installed with the updated version of loadlin (v1.6a) due
to memory detection problems, why is Debian still
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, BOHICA wrote:
: If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his
web
: When the SLINK distribution was frozen, why weren't the installation
: documents upgraded as well? They should address the
5 matches
Mail list logo