Points to Ponder

1998-11-29 Thread BOHICA
If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web page (http://elserv.ffm.fgan.de/~lermen) that all versions greater than 2.1.22 should be installed with the updated version of loadlin (v1.6a) due to memory detection problems, why is Debian still distributing v1.6? Why

Re: Points to Ponder

1998-11-29 Thread Joey Hess
BOHICA wrote: Has anyone noticed that the frozen SLINK distribution is _exactly_ the same as the proposed new potato distribution? New distributions start the same as the old and diverge - I'm not sure what you're getting at. -- see shy jo

Re: Points to Ponder

1998-11-29 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, BOHICA wrote: : If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web : page (http://elserv.ffm.fgan.de/~lermen) that all versions greater than : 2.1.22 should be installed with the updated version of loadlin (v1.6a) due : to memory detection

Re: Points to Ponder

1998-11-29 Thread Mitch Blevins
BOHICA wrote: If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web page (http://elserv.ffm.fgan.de/~lermen) that all versions greater than 2.1.22 should be installed with the updated version of loadlin (v1.6a) due to memory detection problems, why is Debian still

Re: Points to Ponder

1998-11-29 Thread Brandon Mitchell
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, BOHICA wrote: : If the author of the utility loadlin.exe (Hans Lerman) has stated on his web : When the SLINK distribution was frozen, why weren't the installation : documents upgraded as well? They should address the