On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:52:46PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 11 May 2016 at 06:36:43 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Do not submit an
On Wed 11 May 2016 at 06:36:43 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > >
> > > "Do not submit an attachment larger than 10 KiB. Consider using
> > >
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> >
> > "Do not submit an attachment larger than 10 KiB. Consider using
> > paste.debian.net and including a link in your post."
> >
> > From
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:41:10PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> >
> You know, I thought I had tried switching themes with out success. I just
> tried it again and the Oxygen theme cleared up the problem.
So this is the solution to a problem in another thread? :/
--
The media's the most powerful
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:38:53PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> You know, I just looked at http://paste.debian,net. The site seems to be
> more for pasting code snippets than anything else. While there is nothing
> wrong with this, I don't see why they don't just paste the code directly
> into
On 05/03/2016 06:57 AM, heqami...@runbox.com wrote:
On 05/03/2016 05:18 AM, Gary Roach wrote:
I still haven't found a solution for the disappearance of all of my
desktop icons. They are replaced with little transparent squares. They
still work though.
Try to change the theme you are using
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:08:07PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Ralph Sanchez writes:
> > I guess a lot of those 2.1 million customers probably live in very
> > rural areas where maybe other forms aren't available, or the cost to
> > lay wire would be more then they have. My thinking is, we have
On 05/03/2016 05:18 AM, Gary Roach wrote:
> I still haven't found a solution for the disappearance of all of my
> desktop icons. They are replaced with little transparent squares. They
> still work though.
Try to change the theme you are using and/or install some new themes.
and/or install a
On Tue 03 May 2016 at 07:51:29 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Brian composed on 2016-05-03 12:08 (UTC+0100):
>
> >On Mon 02 May 2016 at 23:43:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >>thousands of mailing list subscribers. This list's subscribers can see in
> >>the list posting rules that binary
Brian composed on 2016-05-03 12:08 (UTC+0100):
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 23:43:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
thousands of mailing list subscribers. This list's subscribers can see in
the list posting rules that binary attachments are not to be expected unless
of nominal size, thus can feel safe
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 23:43:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Gary Roach composed on 2016-05-02 16:38 (UTC-0700):
>
> >... Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without
> >penalizing the rest of us.
>
> Penalizing is the emailing of unsolicited binary attachments to hundreds or
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 04:18:59 Gary Roach wrote:
> I still haven't found a solution for the disappearance of all of my
> desktop icons. They are replaced with little transparent squares. They
> still work though.
This problem got lost. I should start a new thread and explain it clearly,
Gene Heskett composed on 2016-05-01 11:57 (UTC-0400):
So I'd like to prose a compromise that recognizes the folks still on
dialup and at dialup speeds. Possibly paying by the minute for access.
Some pay by the byte even with high bandwidth. Not attaching binaries is
about not being wasteful
Gary Roach composed on 2016-05-02 16:38 (UTC-0700):
... Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without
penalizing the rest of us.
Penalizing is the emailing of unsolicited binary attachments to hundreds or
thousands of mailing list subscribers. This list's subscribers can see in
On 05/02/2016 05:04 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 00:38:53 Gary Roach wrote:
Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without
penalizing the rest of us.
"The rest of us" don't have any desire to send pictures and are not being
penalised.
Lisi
I wouldn't send pictures
Ralph Sanchez writes:
> I guess a lot of those 2.1 million customers probably live in very
> rural areas where maybe other forms aren't available, or the cost to
> lay wire would be more then they have. My thinking is, we have GPS
> that works nearly (ok maybe not) everywhere you'd go and want
>
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 00:38:53 Gary Roach wrote:
> Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without
> penalizing the rest of us.
"The rest of us" don't have any desire to send pictures and are not being
penalised.
Lisi
On the subject of Dialup, and this is me speaking for just me, but I'd
rather have to walk five blocks everytime I need internet then spend
20 a month on dial up :/ I guess a lot of those 2.1 million customers
probably live in very rural areas where maybe other forms aren't
available, or the cost
On 05/02/2016 07:01 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or
send anything other than
On Monday 02 May 2016 15:01:12 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> > > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or
> > >
On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or
> > > send anything other than plain text files. This leaves me
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 08:44:53 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
> > the bit bucket [...]
>
> I doubt that part. Especially having already received
On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
>
> > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> > anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem if
> > I wish to post a screen shot. I have
On 05/01/2016 11:44 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
[...]
That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
the bit bucket [...]
I doubt that part. Especially having
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
[...]
> That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
> the bit bucket [...]
I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejects from
some Debian list due to
On 05/01/2016 10:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote:
Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit
on the site restrictions.
Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are
asked, you would get more
On 02/05/16 03:57, Gene Heskett wrote:
> So I'd like to prose a compromise that recognizes the folks still
> on dialup and at dialup speeds. Possibly paying by the minute for
> access.
>
> Accept the attachment, but strip it from the message that goes
> back out to the list and store it on
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 09:59 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I need to re-read Gene Haskett's suggestion again and try to
> impliment
> it. Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a
> bit
> on the site restrictions.
You could probably file a bug about reject notices.
As for
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:12:00 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem
> if I wish to post a screen shot. I have been told that debian has a
> paste bin. Does anyone know
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote:
> Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit
> on the site restrictions.
Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are
asked, you would get more help faster.
Lisi
On 05/01/2016 04:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
anything other than plain text files.
I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and
On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far
> >
> > turned
> >
> > > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up. Whilst
> > > Debian Users list
On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far
> >
> > turned
> >
> > > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up. Whilst
> > > Debian Users list
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far
> turned
> > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up. Whilst
> > Debian Users list certainly accepts attachments, it does look as
> > though it doesn't like
On Sunday 01 May 2016 07:28:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or
> > send anything other than plain text files.
>
> I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far turned
> up.
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> > anything other than plain text files.
>
> I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but
>
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> anything other than plain text files.
I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but another
email I sent twenty minutes later has arrived. Although
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> anything other than plain text files.
I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far turned up.
But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up.
On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem if
> I wish to post a screen shot. I have been told that debian has a paste
> bin. Does anyone know
I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem if I
wish to post a screen shot. I have been told that debian has a paste
bin. Does anyone know the url for that bin.
Gary R
40 matches
Mail list logo
