Shao Zhang wrote:
Hi,
sorry about the OT message.
While on the topic of realtek8029, I have got a pcmcia 8029
ethernet card and it works perfectly under linux.
But I can never get this card working under w2k :(
Anyone have any ideas?
Shao.
Hi,
sorry about the OT message.
While on the topic of realtek8029, I have got a pcmcia 8029
ethernet card and it works perfectly under linux.
But I can never get this card working under w2k :(
Anyone have any ideas?
Shao.
--
I worked with one of these recently it was a pain in the ass :) I
believe the proper way to load the module was to first load the 8390
module first. the mandrake box i was working with did not have the
proper dependency information for this module so modprobe wouldn't
auto-load 8390.
so..try
Actually, I have no problems with a realtek 8029 card; however, I always
re-compile the
kernel after I get the thing on; that usually gets rid of the unresolved symbols
problem... In fact, with all the kernel module(s) I've used, re-compiling the
kernel
from scratch (including the modules)
No signs of nic when booting, insmod ne2k-pci.o gives me unresolved
symbols-error, and ifconfig -yadayada gives me error to the effect
that there's no hardware to configure.
I have no idea why kmod doesn't insmod your modules automagically.
But ne2k-pci depends on 8390 module; so try modprobe
Troy Telford wrote:
Actually, I have no problems with a realtek 8029 card; however, I always
re-compile the
kernel after I get the thing on; that usually gets rid of the unresolved
symbols
problem... In fact, with all the kernel module(s) I've used, re-compiling
the kernel
from
More stuff:
I did a
# modprobe ne2k-pci
and I get this:
ne2k-pci..: PCI NE2000 clone 'Realtek RTL-8029* at I/O 0x20a0, IRQ
9.
eth0: RealTek RTL-8029 found at 0x20a0, IRQ 9, 00:00:B4:B8:94:CC
#
I suppose this means that the modular driver has been installed in
the kernel and detected my NIC. So
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:33:45PM +0200, Vitux wrote
Trying to build a tiny lan here...
Recompile fresh 2.2.16 with the ne2k-pci driver as module.
No signs of nic when booting, insmod ne2k-pci.o gives me unresolved
symbols-error, and ifconfig -yadayada gives me error to the effect
that
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:53:18AM +0200, Vitux wrote
More stuff:
I did a
# modprobe ne2k-pci
and I get this:
ne2k-pci..: PCI NE2000 clone 'Realtek RTL-8029* at I/O 0x20a0, IRQ
9.
eth0: RealTek RTL-8029 found at 0x20a0, IRQ 9, 00:00:B4:B8:94:CC
#
I suppose this means that the modular
John Pearson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:53:18AM +0200, Vitux wrote
More stuff:
I did a
# modprobe ne2k-pci
and I get this:
ne2k-pci..: PCI NE2000 clone 'Realtek RTL-8029* at I/O 0x20a0, IRQ
9.
eth0: RealTek RTL-8029 found at 0x20a0, IRQ 9, 00:00:B4:B8:94:CC
#
I suppose
Trying to build a tiny lan here...
Recompile fresh 2.2.16 with the ne2k-pci driver as module.
No signs of nic when booting, insmod ne2k-pci.o gives me unresolved
symbols-error, and ifconfig -yadayada gives me error to the effect
that there's no hardware to configure.
So the question is: to nic or
For what it's worth, I am running one of these cards with the driver
compiled into 2.2.16, rather than as a module.
Here's a snippet from dmesg:
ne2k-pci.c:vpre-1.00e 5/27/99 D. Becker/P. Gortmaker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/ne2k-pci.html
ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'RealTek
12 matches
Mail list logo
