robin wrote:
Sid is the testing kernel and is more advanced than
Sarge and will cause you problems; stay away from
that one.
I would disagree. For a production machine definitely but maybe not a
desktop machine. I have run unstable without any problems for 18
months. Maybe I've been lucky
I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled. Should I go with
Stable Woody or Development Sarge?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled.
Should I go with
Stable Woody or Development Sarge?
I installed stable woody from purchased CD's (which is
what you will be buying) and have been able to upgrade
it to Sarge status by recompiling the source
#secure method=pgp mode=sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled. Should I go with
Stable Woody or Development Sarge?
I'd say you're safe with either right now. You'll probably want Sarge
because it's not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided to buy a PC with Debian Preinstalled. Should I go with
Stable Woody or Development Sarge?
Which PC?
Why not build a PC, buy the 14CD's and install Sarge?
Sarge, definitely. But why not wait until Sarge is stable? Then you
won't have to upgrade...
Hugo.
--
Sid is the testing kernel and is more advanced than
Sarge and will cause you problems; stay away from
that one.
I would disagree. For a production machine definitely but maybe not a
desktop machine. I have run unstable without any problems for 18 months.
Maybe I've been lucky but debian in
On Monday 20 September 2004 19:02, robin wrote:
Sid is the testing kernel and is more advanced than
Sarge and will cause you problems; stay away from
that one.
I would disagree. For a production machine definitely but maybe not a
desktop machine. I have run unstable without any problems for
7 matches
Mail list logo
