Am 2008-07-27 16:53:28, schrieb Arvind Marathe:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
possible-spam/
#
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: *
This
* ^X-Spam-Level.*\*\*\*\*\*
works better.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:40:39PM +0530, Arvind Marathe wrote:
Hmm - i have only used procmail. Sometime i will try maildrop.
Depending on whether i like it, i'll join one of the camps and either
credit you or curse you ;)
Have a read of the man page for fetchmail. It does not look to
Arvind Marathe:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: *
possible-spam/
Bob Cox:
Won't that rule match anything with a 'X-Spam-Level:' header ?
Yes, the asterisks in the rule are being treated as regular
expression characters (match any of preceding character).
You want:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Andrei Popescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun,27.Jul.08, 17:07:29, Arvind Marathe wrote:
OK some more investigation. All the d-u mails, getting listed as spam,
have X-Spam-Checker-Version, X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status, in their
headers. For eg. one of the
On Mon,28.Jul.08, 14:57:16, Arvind Marathe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Andrei Popescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun,27.Jul.08, 17:07:29, Arvind Marathe wrote:
OK some more investigation. All the d-u mails, getting listed as spam,
have X-Spam-Checker-Version, X-Spam-Level
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:34:33AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
Arvind Marathe:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: *
possible-spam/
Bob Cox:
Won't that rule match anything with a 'X-Spam-Level:' header ?
Yes, the asterisks in the rule are being treated as regular
expression characters (match any
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:36:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon,28.Jul.08, 14:57:16, Arvind Marathe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Andrei Popescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun,27.Jul.08, 17:07:29, Arvind Marathe wrote:
OK some more investigation. All the d-u mails,
Hi!
As mentioned in another thread yesterday, i have setup getmail to
retrieve mails from my gmail id. In my setup, getmail delivers the
mail to procmail, which in turn filters them into different mailboxes,
including a possible-spam mailbox depending on certain criteria. Now
all my d-u mails
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:53:28PM +0530, Arvind Marathe wrote:
Hi!
As mentioned in another thread yesterday, i have setup getmail to
retrieve mails from my gmail id. In my setup, getmail delivers the
mail to procmail, which in turn filters them into different mailboxes,
including a
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 17:07:29 +0530, Arvind Marathe ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:53:28PM +0530, Arvind Marathe wrote:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: *
possible-spam/
Won't that rule match anything with a 'X-Spam-Level:' header ?
--
Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 01:35:00PM +0100, Bob Cox wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 17:07:29 +0530, Arvind Marathe ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:53:28PM +0530, Arvind Marathe wrote:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: *
possible-spam/
Won't that rule match anything
On Sun,27.Jul.08, 17:07:29, Arvind Marathe wrote:
OK some more investigation. All the d-u mails, getting listed as spam,
have X-Spam-Checker-Version, X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status, in their
headers. For eg. one of the mails has:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on
12 matches
Mail list logo