2006/8/25, Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> Well Python is not a good language for writing a chess engine (even if
> a chess engine exists:
> http://www.kolumbus.fi/jyrki.alakuijala/pychess.html), but it could be
> grat for chess interfaces, for drawing boards, and similar thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> but it could be grat for chess interfaces, for drawing boards,
>> and similar things.
>
> Then I fail to see the problem unless he is unaware that Python
> can call a C compiled lib and for computationally in
Ron Johnson wrote:
> but it could be grat for chess interfaces, for drawing boards,
> and similar things.
Then I fail to see the problem unless he is unaware that Python can call a
C compiled lib and for computationally intensive tasks the author is
encouraged to do just that. I fail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
>> 2006/8/24, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> The 1st link in his email describes how when a python chess
>>> player was (mechanically) converted to C++, the resulting app
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> 2006/8/24, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The 1st link in his email describes how when a python chess player
>> was (mechanically) converted to C++, the resulting app ran 10x faster.
> That's it, compiled languages are fastar than interp
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> Well Python is not a good language for writing a chess engine (even if
> a chess engine exists:
> http://www.kolumbus.fi/jyrki.alakuijala/pychess.html), but it could be
> grat for chess interfaces, for drawing boards, and similar things. I
> foudn out a library for these th
s a pretty definite statement to throw
> out without an explanation. For those who are fond of the
> language, such as myself, we're left with extreme curiosity as to
> why you feel that way.
The 1st link in his email describes how when a python chess player
was (mechanically) conv
ut an explanation. For those who are fond of the
> language, such as myself, we're left with extreme curiosity as to
> why you feel that way.
The 1st link in his email describes how when a python chess player
was (mechanically) converted to C++, the resulting app ran 10x faster.
- -
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> Well Python is not a good language for writing a chess engine (even if
> a chess engine exists:
Uh... why? I mean that's a pretty definite statement to throw out without
an explanation. For those who are fond of the language, such as myself, we're
left with extreme cu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> Well Python is not a good language for writing a chess engine (even if
> a chess engine exists:
> http://www.kolumbus.fi/jyrki.alakuijala/pychess.html), but it could be
Maybe NumPy would speed things up?
> grat for chess inter
Well Python is not a good language for writing a chess engine (even if
a chess engine exists:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/jyrki.alakuijala/pychess.html), but it could be
grat for chess interfaces, for drawing boards, and similar things. I
foudn out a library for these things
(http://www.alcyone.com/sof
11 matches
Mail list logo
