Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-08 Thread Brian
On Fri 08 Jan 2016 at 02:36:20 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-01-07 18:47:48 +, Brian wrote: > > Many WiFi devices require firmware. Some of those devices will not have > > an interface registered (they are not initialised) if the firmware is > > not present to be loaded into the

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-01-07 18:47:48 +, Brian wrote: > Many WiFi devices require firmware. Some of those devices will not have > an interface registered (they are not initialised) if the firmware is > not present to be loaded into the device. Other devices get an interface > whether the firmware is present

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-07 Thread Brian
On Thu 07 Jan 2016 at 13:12:59 +, Brian wrote: > Pass. 70-persistent-net.rules was generated on Jessie and carried over > to testing. You would need a Jessie install on the same machine to > investigate. Perhaps not; one theory could be tested on Stretch. Many WiFi devices require firmware.

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-01-02 16:21:11 +, Brian wrote: > On Fri 01 Jan 2016 at 17:22:37 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2016-01-01 12:03:32 +, Brian wrote: > > > On Thu 31 Dec 2015 at 19:08:18 +0100, Hans wrote: > > > > What do 'ls /sys/class/net' and 'ip link' give without this addition? > > > >

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-06 Thread Brian
On Wed 06 Jan 2016 at 13:56:57 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-01-02 16:21:11 +, Brian wrote: > > > > Move 70-persistent-net.rules somewhere and do > > > > rmmod -v > > > > followed by > > > > modprobe -v > > > > Repeat with 70-persistent-net.rules returned to

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-01-06 13:55:45 +, Brian wrote: > On Wed 06 Jan 2016 at 13:56:57 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2016-01-02 16:21:11 +, Brian wrote: > > > > > > Move 70-persistent-net.rules somewhere and do > > > > > > rmmod -v > > > > > > followed by > > > > > > modprobe -v > > >

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-02 Thread Brian
On Fri 01 Jan 2016 at 17:22:37 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-01-01 12:03:32 +, Brian wrote: > > On Thu 31 Dec 2015 at 19:08:18 +0100, Hans wrote: > > > What do 'ls /sys/class/net' and 'ip link' give without this addition? > > > > > > I get: > > > > > > ls /sys/class/net/ > > > >

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-01 Thread Brian
On Thu 31 Dec 2015 at 19:08:18 +0100, Hans wrote: > What do 'ls /sys/class/net' and 'ip link' give without this addition? > > I get: > > ls /sys/class/net/ > > enp1s0 Io wlan0 Interesting. One interface is renamed; one is not (wlan0). [Snip] > I believe, the different outrputs are just

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2016-01-01 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-01-01 12:03:32 +, Brian wrote: > On Thu 31 Dec 2015 at 19:08:18 +0100, Hans wrote: > > What do 'ls /sys/class/net' and 'ip link' give without this addition? > > > > I get: > > > > ls /sys/class/net/ > > > > enp1s0 Io wlan0 > > Interesting. One interface is renamed; one is not

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2015-12-31 Thread Hans
Hi Brian, > Is there no sign of any discovered interfaces for the Aspire in the > output of dmesg? > I get this: dmesg | grep eth0 [2.201866] forcedeth :00:0a.0: ifname eth0, PHY OUI 0x732 @ 1, addr 1c:75:08:2c:84:f8 [ 36.198523] forcedeth :00:0a.0 eth0: MSI enabled [

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2015-12-31 Thread Brian
On Wed 30 Dec 2015 at 16:11:39 +0100, Hans wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2015, 12:58:23 schrieb Jörg-Volker Peetz: > Hi Jörg-Volker > > Did you take a look at dmesg on both systems? Something like > > > > grep -E '(enp|eth)' /var/log/dmesg > This showed no useful information. The only

MAC address and security (was: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try))

2015-12-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2015-12-30 16:11:39 +0100, Hans wrote: > I changed the MAC cause of security purposes in this mail. FYI: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/67893/is-it-dangerous-to-post-my-mac-address-publicly -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)

2015-12-30 Thread Hans
Am Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2015, 12:58:23 schrieb Jörg-Volker Peetz: Hi Jörg-Volker > Did you take a look at dmesg on both systems? Something like > > grep -E '(enp|eth)' /var/log/dmesg This showed no useful information. The only output is from my EEEPC below, the Aspire showed no output at