Re: Question about /proc/loadavg

2018-08-02 Thread Martin Drescher
Hi Andy, Am 02.08.2018 um 13:01 schrieb Andy Smith: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Martin Drescher wrote: [...] >> 4.9. It is not a real problem, that Debian is running well. > > It is likely that the kernel's idea of what is a "runnable" process > has changed since t

Re: Question about /proc/loadavg

2018-08-02 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Martin, On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Martin Drescher wrote: > I'm running a bunch of HTTP servers, most of them running a RHEL > 6, which is a kernel version 2.6. All patches applied, so that > Meltdown and Spectre stuff should be included. Some of the servers > where migrated to a

Re: Question about /proc/loadavg

2018-07-31 Thread Martin Drescher
[...] > Hi Martin, > > can you show real data from /proc/loadavg output? Which column do you > compare? I' talking about the 1/5/15 minute numbers. > I wouldn't worry about difference in /proc/loadavg because everything is > different between RHEL/CentOS 6 and Debian 9 - kernel, Apache version,

Re: Question about /proc/loadavg

2018-07-31 Thread Georgi Naplatanov
On 07/31/2018 10:31 AM, Martin Drescher wrote: > Hi ML members, > > I have a question about how the numbers compute which I get from > /proc/loadavg. > I'm running a bunch of HTTP servers, most of them running a RHEL 6, which is > a kernel version 2.6. All patches applied, so that Meltdown and S

Question about /proc/loadavg

2018-07-31 Thread Martin Drescher
Hi ML members, I have a question about how the numbers compute which I get from /proc/loadavg. I'm running a bunch of HTTP servers, most of them running a RHEL 6, which is a kernel version 2.6. All patches applied, so that Meltdown and Spectre stuff should be included. Some of the servers where