Hi back,
Am 2018-04-17 hackte Dan Ritter in die Tasten:
> The LSI Megaraid controllers have worked very well for me. They
> are now owned by Broadcom.
>
> The current model is 9361-16i. Previous generations still work
> well, especially for spinning disks, and are available under the
> Avago and S
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:33 am Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:55:20AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Hello *,
> >
> > very long time ago (17 years) I used 3Ware Hardware Raid Controller where
> > most are working up to now and they are not broken yet.
> >
> > However, for all ne
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:55:20AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> very long time ago (17 years) I used 3Ware Hardware Raid Controller where
> most are working up to now and they are not broken yet.
>
> However, for all newer installations I use Adaptec and especially the
> 71506E w
* David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 00:40, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > * Graham Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> > ...
> >
> > > Eventually VFS Kernel Panic. Cant mount root fs. There's also a
> > > message about block-major-8.
> >
> > It's trying to
On Thursday 06 December 2001 00:40, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> * Graham Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> ...
>
> > Eventually VFS Kernel Panic. Cant mount root fs. There's also a
> > message about block-major-8.
>
> It's trying to load the driver from /lib/modules on root fs. Oops.
>
> Y
* Graham Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
...
> Eventually VFS Kernel Panic. Cant mount root fs. There's also a
> message about block-major-8.
It's trying to load the driver from /lib/modules on root fs. Oops.
You have two options:
1. build a custom kernel with the driver compiled in.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 12:24:46PM -0600, Michael Blood wrote:
[ try responding after the quoted material so we know what you're
talking about ... jeopardy style quoting sucks ]
> > So most of the patch was applied except for "Hunk #2" which failed at 735.
> > the file Makefile.rej looks like the f
n.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec Raid
>
> So most of the patch was applied except for "Hunk #2" which failed at 735.
> the file Makefile.rej looks like the following.
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/linux$ more drivers/scsi/Makefile.rej
> >***
> >*** 72
>
> So most of the patch was applied except for "Hunk #2" which failed at 735.
> the file Makefile.rej looks like the following.
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/linux$ more drivers/scsi/Makefile.rej
> >***
> >*** 727,730
> >
> > sd_mod.o: sd.o sd_ioctl.o
> >$(LD) $(LD_RFLAG
I am patching?
Thanks,
Michael Blood
-Original Message-
From: Mike McGuire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Michael Blood
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec Raid
>
> Now when I run the patch command:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sr
>
> Now when I run the patch command:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/linux$ patch -p0 <../patches/dpt_i2o-2.0-2.2.18
> I recieve the following message
>
> >can't find file to patch at input line 4
> >Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> >The text leading up to this was:
> >-
on Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:15:27PM -0600, Michael Blood ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I think I will take your advice and try it however I do not want to modify
> the kernel that the current machine is running on.
> So I have created a different directory ~/src/ and am doing all the work
> there.
-Original Message-
From: kmself@ix.netcom.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:03 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec Raid
on Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 03:34:47PM -0600, Michael Blood
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rich,
> I am unfamiliar with applying pat
on Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 03:34:47PM -0600, Michael Blood ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Rich,
> I am unfamiliar with applying patches, recompiling kernels or otherwise
> messing with the "Guts of the installation process". I have, however, been
> working on a debian 2.2 box for about 8 months though
l Blood; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec Raid
Err... Sorry, wrong Adaptec-related web site. The correct site is:
http://www.aurore.net/source/
The dpt patches are the ones you need.
--Rich
Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> You need to patch your kernel to add the nece
Err... Sorry, wrong Adaptec-related web site. The correct site is:
http://www.aurore.net/source/
The dpt patches are the ones you need.
--Rich
Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> You need to patch your kernel to add the necessary drivers that support
> the Adaptec card. Adaptec hasn't gotten th
Michael,
You need to patch your kernel to add the necessary drivers that support
the Adaptec card. Adaptec hasn't gotten the message that "Linux" is not
"RedHat", so it's not a trivial process. See:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gibbs/linux/ for the necessary patches for
the kernel.
If you're tryin
17 matches
Mail list logo
