Re: Latest licq packages seems broken

1999-11-18 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 09:55:00PM -0600, Christian Dysthe wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded to licq 0.7.1 on my potato box today. I didn't receive any > error messages, but licq won't run now. > > When I try to run it I get: > > "Illegal instruction" > > Anyone know what might be wrong? > > TIA >

RE: Latest licq packages seems broken

1999-11-17 Thread Pollywog
On 17-Nov-1999 Christian Dysthe wrote: > Yes, I did read the upgrade file. Either licq itself or the plug-in > package must have been broken because after I went to Incoming and got > the 0.7.1-2 packages everything works fine again. > > I guess these two packages will be among todays upgrades o

RE: Latest licq packages seems broken

1999-11-17 Thread Christian Dysthe
On 17 Nov, Pollywog wrote: > Did you read the UPGRADE file? There is a small addition you must make to > your licq.conf so that it will be compatible with newer versions; either that, > or just start with a fresh .licq/licq.confIt is a very small change that > you need to make, but without th

RE: Latest licq packages seems broken

1999-11-17 Thread Pollywog
On 17-Nov-1999 Christian Dysthe wrote: >> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < >> /dev/null >> > I do have the libqt2 package installed, and licq 0.70.1a worked fine. I > now tried to downgrade licq to 0.70.1a. I still get the same error! > > I can't even run 0.70.1a that I hav

RE: Latest licq packages seems broken

1999-11-17 Thread Christian Dysthe
On 17 Nov, Pollywog wrote: > > On 17-Nov-1999 Christian Dysthe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I upgraded to licq 0.7.1 on my potato box today. I didn't receive any >> error messages, but licq won't run now. >> >> When I try to run it I get: >> >> "Illegal instruction" >> >> Anyone know what might be wron

RE: Latest licq packages seems broken

1999-11-17 Thread Pollywog
On 17-Nov-1999 Christian Dysthe wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded to licq 0.7.1 on my potato box today. I didn't receive any > error messages, but licq won't run now. > > When I try to run it I get: > > "Illegal instruction" > > Anyone know what might be wrong? The .70 and later packages require Q