Re: POP3

On Tue 22 Dec 2015 at 02:48:00 (+1300), Chris Bannister wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:28:35PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > Of course I removed the "was": it wasn't in the subject line of the > > post you were responding to. > > Did you get out of the wrong side of bed? Inserting

Re: POP3

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:28:35PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > Of course I removed the "was": it wasn't in the subject line of the > post you were responding to. Did you get out of the wrong side of bed? Inserting 'was' is normal practice when starting a sub thread. -- "If you're not

OT Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 07:19:17PM -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote: > On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, Curt wrote: > > >My cat died and I don't want another because of the heartbreak I > >went through. > > I am so sorry for your loss, which very clearly was a *major* one. > Try to give yourself enough time to

Re: OT Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Bob Holtzman wrote: When I had to put down my old guy and best friend "Num Nutz" I cried more than I did at my mother's funeralso I know the feeling. Yes. Some may want to complain that this exchange is OT, but I submit that this Christmas week, with the world

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On 2015-12-18, Ric Moore wrote: I just don't, for my use, like a lot of what IMAP does. > > I use POP. Nuff said. :) Ric And I don't give a shit what you use. I don't have a car and bought my first cell phone six months ago. My cat died and I don't want another

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, Curt wrote: My cat died and I don't want another because of the heartbreak I went through. I am so sorry for your loss, which very clearly was a *major* one. Try to give yourself enough time to grieve; there's no telling how long that will take. There's no FAQ for

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:32:01 + Lisi Reisz wrote: > Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, lusers > and/or dinosaurs use POP3, how many others of us will admit to it? (For the > avoidance of doubt, I use POP3.) I am also one of the

Re: POP3

Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI composed on 2015-12-18 07:57 (UTC-0300): > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:32:01 + Lisi Reisz wrote: >> Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, lusers >> and/or dinosaurs use POP3, how many others of us will admit to it? (For the >> avoidance of

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:32:01 + Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging info. > > > > The guts of my ~/.fetchmailrc are > > > > poll > > protopop3 > > user > >

Re: POP3

Hi, > [coming out of several POP3 users] I am carrying Carl Harris' "popclient" from computer to computer since the 1990s. It can even do POP2 if you find a server that cooperates. Occasionally i have to adapt it to the newest internet habits and threats. But that's only minor polishing. Its

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 11:26:35 Joe wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:32:01 + > > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging info. > > > > > > The guts of my ~/.fetchmailrc are >

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 07:57:37 -0300 Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: Hello Renaud, >backwoods and using POP3 (and refusing systemd...) Using POP3 here, too. I don't need access 24/7 worldwide to all my emails. And frankly, leaving (some of my personal) emails on a

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

Gene: I'm unfamiliar with the term "mailfile." Can you expand a tad on that? Q'est-ce que? -- Bob Bernstein

Re: POP3

On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 10:32:01 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging info. > > > > The guts of my ~/.fetchmailrc are > > > > poll > > protopop3 > > user > > password > > ssl

Re: POP3

On Friday 18 December 2015 15:27:08 David Wright wrote: > On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 10:32:01 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging info. > > > > > > The guts of my ~/.fetchmailrc are > > > > > >

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 05:32:01 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging info. > > > > The guts of my ~/.fetchmailrc are > > > > poll > > protopop3 > > user > > password > > ssl

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 09:54:54 Bob Bernstein wrote: > Gene: I'm unfamiliar with the term "mailfile." Can you expand a > tad on that? Q'est-ce que? A mailfile, as I understand it, is the whole thing merged into one file, with a blank line or something as a separator, and an index file

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 10:19:46 Petter Adsen wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:31:45 -0500 > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 05:32:01 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, > > > lusers and/or

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 07:13:42 Brad Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 07:57:37 -0300 > Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: > > Hello Renaud, > > >backwoods and using POP3 (and refusing systemd...) > > Using POP3 here, too. I don't need access 24/7 worldwide to all

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:31:45 -0500 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2015 05:32:01 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, > > lusers and/or dinosaurs use POP3, how many others of us will admit > > to it? (For the

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 10:19:46 Petter Adsen wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:31:45 -0500 > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 05:32:01 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, > > > lusers and/or

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:07:57 -0500 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2015 10:19:46 Petter Adsen wrote: > > If you want to try setting up a Dovecot server, there are lots of > > good tutorials and other docs out there. I can probably dig up > > links to the pages I

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 12:23:25 Petter Adsen wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:07:57 -0500 > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 10:19:46 Petter Adsen wrote: > > > If you want to try setting up a Dovecot server, there are lots of > > > good tutorials and

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 16:07:57 Gene Heskett wrote: > And I was confused, I meant dovecot, not icedove, and whose magic crystal > ball issues these names anyway? :)  icedove is of course t-bird, without > the branding. Phew. Glad it wasn't me. I couldn't make sense of "Icedove", but there

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On 12/18/2015 10:19 AM, Petter Adsen wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:31:45 -0500 Gene Heskett wrote: On Friday 18 December 2015 05:32:01 Lisi Reisz wrote: Having just by implication been told by someone that only muggles, lusers and/or dinosaurs use POP3, how many others

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On 18/12/15 18:14, Gene Heskett wrote: Ok, I have constructed a recursive pull ~/.wgetrc, but all I get are syntax errors. The file: (which kmail cannit insert, so copy-paste) gene@coyote:~/Documents/dovecot-wiki$ cat ~/.wgetrc -np --follow-ftp -r -l 20 -k Using "info wget" to read the wget

Re: POP3

On Saturday 19 December 2015 00:28:35 David Wright wrote: > On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 15:36:05 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2015 15:27:08 David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 10:32:01 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote:

Re: POP3

On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 15:36:05 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2015 15:27:08 David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 18 Dec 2015 at 10:32:01 (+), Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Friday 18 December 2015 09:49:59 Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > > Also, run 'fetchmail --version' for debugging

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Gene Heskett wrote: A mailfile, as I understand it, is the whole thing merged into one file, with a blank line or something as a separator, and an index file containing the starting offset and read status of each message in the main file to speed up the search for new

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:33:14 -0500 (EST) Bob Bernstein wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > A mailfile, as I understand it, is the whole thing merged into > > one file, with a blank line or something as a separator, and > > an index file containing

Re: POP3 was: Re: command not found [SOLVED]

On Friday 18 December 2015 14:02:52 Martin Read wrote: > On 18/12/15 18:14, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Ok, I have constructed a recursive pull ~/.wgetrc, but all I get are > > syntax errors. The file: (which kmail cannit insert, so copy-paste) > > gene@coyote:~/Documents/dovecot-wiki$ cat ~/.wgetrc

Re: POP3 softwares.

Hi, On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:46:15PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote: Problem Given a remote POP3 server which provides SSL. Also a MUA on a local host, which retrieves by POP3 when activated by the user and lacks SSL. Try to move messages from the server to the MUA. Candidate Solution

Re: POP3 softwares.

On 1/25/14, Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:46:15PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote: Problem Given a remote POP3 server which provides SSL. Also a MUA on a local host, which retrieves by POP3 when activated by the user and lacks SSL. Try to move messages

Re: POP3 softwares.

2014-01-19 06:46 keltezéssel, Peter Easthope írta: Problem Given a remote POP3 server which provides SSL. Also a MUA on a local host, which retrieves by POP3 when activated by the user and lacks SSL. Try to move messages from the server to the MUA. Candidate Solution Let getmail, in the

Re: POP3 softwares.

Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2014, 21:46:15 schrieb Peter Easthope: Problem Given a remote POP3 server which provides SSL. Also a MUA on a local host, which retrieves by POP3 when activated by the user and lacks SSL. Try to move messages from the server to the MUA. Candidate Solution Let

Re: POP3 softwares.

On Sun, January 19, 2014 2:53 am, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote: I use fetchmail for similar task. OK; thanks. In your application, where or how does fetchmail deliver messages? The documentation I've seen mentions acquisition by POP but doesn't mention disposal. ...

Re: POP3 softwares.

2014-01-19 19:02 keltezéssel, Peter Easthope írta: I use fetchmail for similar task. OK; thanks. In your application, where or how does fetchmail deliver messages? The documentation I've seen mentions acquisition by POP but doesn't mention disposal. It puts the emails to the user's mail

Re: POP3 softwares.

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:46:15PM -0800, Peter Easthope wrote: Problem Given a remote POP3 server which provides SSL. Also a MUA on a local host, which retrieves by POP3 when activated by the user and lacks SSL. Try to move messages from the server to the MUA. Candidate Solution Let

What´s wrong with fetchmail? (Re: POP3 in Debian)

Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes: I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail or mpop are options. What´s wrong with fetchmail? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: What´s wrong with fetchmail? (Re: POP3 in Debian)

On 24 Jan 2012, lee wrote: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes: I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail or mpop are options. What´s wrong with fetchmail? It's fine if it works for you, but some years ago I had problems authenticting myself to a mail

Re: What´s wrong with fetchmail? (Re: POP3 in Debian)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:47 AM, lee l...@songoku.yagibdah.de wrote: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes: I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail or mpop are options. What´s wrong with fetchmail? http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/01/msg01476.html -- To

Re: What´s wrong with fetchmail? (Re: POP3 in Debian)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Anthony Campbell wrote: It's fine if it works for you, but some years ago I had problems authenticting myself to a mail server with fetchmail. I switched to getmail4 and it worked instantly. I can't remember the details now but I've always used

Re: What´s wrong with fetchmail? (Re: POP3 in Debian)

On 24 Jan 2012, Johann Spies wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Anthony Campbell wrote: It's fine if it works for you, but some years ago I had problems authenticting myself to a mail server with fetchmail. I switched to getmail4 and it worked instantly. I can't remember

Re: What�s wrong with fetchmail? (Re: POP3 in Debian)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +, Anthony Campbell wrote: On 24 Jan 2012, lee wrote: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes: I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail or mpop are options. What´s wrong with fetchmail? It's fine if it works

Re: POP3 in Debian

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:38:23 +, Jon Dowland wrote: (...) I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail or mpop are options. Long-time fetchmail user -and lover- here! (me, I mean...) :-) Can you please explain what motivates your above advice? Greetings, --

Re: POP3 in Debian

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:49:22 -0800, peasthope wrote: Since the weekend my MUA POP3 connection has failed to receive messages with this appearing in the log. Which MUA? --- POP RCV: +OK pop.shaw.ca SND: USER peasthope RCV: +OK password required for user peasth...@shaw.ca SND: PASS

Re: POP3 in Debian

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:38:23 +, Jon Dowland wrote: I'd strongly recommend using something *other* than fetchmail: getmail or mpop are options. What's wrong with Fetchmail? Works flawlessly for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: POP3 in Debian

If it has worked before, it could as well be a temporarily problem of your provider. By the way, here we're using pop3 encrypted via ssl (which nowadays every provider should have available) in order to protect the password from eavesdropping. -- Best regards, Jörg-Volker. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: POP3 in Debian

Am Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2012 schrieb peasth...@shaw.ca: Failure in parsing LIST 1 baffles. How big a problem can parsing of 6 characters be? To understand further, I want a Debian system to automatically retrieve messages from the POP3 server and put them in /home/peter/mbox. Then qpopper

Re: Re: POP3 in Debian

On Mi, 18 ian 12, 19:16:03, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: * From: Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com * Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:06:16 +0200 Try having a look at your mail via some other means (webmail or so) to see if there is something that might create problems. Web access

Re: POP3 in Debian

On 19/01/12 09:32, Martin Steigerwald wrote: You could try with fetchmail, but I am not completely sure whether it can store what it retrieves in a mbox or whether it only supports maildir. Fairly sure fetchmail (et al) can inject mail to the local MDA, so where it ends up afterwards depends

Re: POP3 in Debian

Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2012 schrieb Jon Dowland: On 19/01/12 09:32, Martin Steigerwald wrote: You could try with fetchmail, but I am not completely sure whether it can store what it retrieves in a mbox or whether it only supports maildir. Fairly sure fetchmail (et al) can inject mail

Re: POP3 in Debian

Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2012 schrieb Jon Dowland: On 19/01/12 09:32, Martin Steigerwald wrote: You could try with fetchmail, but I am not completely sure whether it can store what it retrieves in a mbox or whether it only

Re: POP3 in Debian

Hi, Both getmail4 and fetchmail can handle this task well (Though I like the getmail4 package as being its maintainer.) On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:49:22PM -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi, Since the weekend my MUA POP3 connection has failed to receive messages with this appearing in the

Re: POP3 in Debian

* Jon Dowland wrote on 2012-01-19 at 11:38 (+): On 19/01/12 09:32, Martin Steigerwald wrote: You could try with fetchmail, but I am not completely sure whether it can store what it retrieves in a mbox or whether it only supports maildir. Fairly sure fetchmail (et al) can inject mail to

Re: POP3 in Debian

On 19/01/12 12:50, Mathias Bauer wrote: Is this a general advice? If so, then why? Yes. http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/faq.html#faq-about-why covers many reasons. Or is it your advice for the OP's aim to directly deliver messages to a mbox or maildir without exim and without running an

Re: POP3 in Debian

Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2012 schrieb Jon Dowland: On 19/01/12 12:50, Mathias Bauer wrote: Is this a general advice? If so, then why? Yes. http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/faq.html#faq-about-why covers many reasons. Holy smoke! Well that are enough reasons for me. OTOH it would be

Re: POP3 in Debian

On Mi, 18 ian 12, 13:49:22, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi, Since the weekend my MUA POP3 connection has failed to receive messages with this appearing in the log. --- POP RCV: +OK pop.shaw.ca SND: USER peasthope RCV: +OK password required for user peasth...@shaw.ca SND: PASS RCV:

Re: Re: POP3 in Debian

* From: Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com * Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:06:16 +0200 Try having a look at your mail via some other means (webmail or so) to see if there is something that might create problems. Web access shows nothing unusual. Messages have come to the

Re: POP3 Connector

Em Domingo 13 Março 2011, às 13:08:36, Joao Mandl escreveu: Galera, Estou migrando um SBS (Windows) para Linux. Já escolhi tudo, mas estou em dúvida de qual pop3 connector usar? Alguém indica algum? Pensei em usar o Zimbra mas achei nos testes que fiz com umas máquinas virtuais que ele

Re: POP3 connector for exchange 2007

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 30.03.09 03:19, Phillipus Gunawan wrote: I just been asking by manager to deploy a POP3 connector for winblow$2008 I guess it's asked by manager - the manager asked you for that... with exchange 2007 The company been using winblow$2003 and moving to 08 with

Re: POP3 connector for exchange 2007

On 30.03.09 03:19, Phillipus Gunawan wrote: I just been asking by manager to deploy a POP3 connector for winblow$2008 I guess it's asked by manager - the manager asked you for that... with exchange 2007 The company been using winblow$2003 and moving to 08 with exchange 2007 exchange supports

Re: POP3 connector for exchange 2007

Phillipus Gunawan wrote: Hi There, I just been asking by manager to deploy a POP3 connector for winblow$2008 with exchange 2007 The company been using winblow$2003 and moving to 08 with exchange 2007 What would be a good friendly package to integrate it with AD which will deliver the POP

Re: POP3 server

On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:26:37 +0300 Tero Mäntyvaara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have used POP3 server now a few months, but I have forgot whitch one it was. :-/ How can I find out whitch server I am using? :-D Tero Mäntyvaara quick and dirty way is to to telnet to port 110 of the IP and

Re: POP3 server

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 02:26:37PM +0300, Tero Mäntyvaara wrote: I have used POP3 server now a few months, but I have forgot whitch one it was. :-/ How can I find out whitch server I am using? :-D Start with: netstat -lntp | grep 110 to check what process listens on port 110 . -- Tzafrir

Re: POP3 server

Tero Mäntyvaara wrote: I have used POP3 server now a few months, but I have forgot whitch one it was. :-/ How can I find out whitch server I am using? :-D Is the server still configured in any application you are using? pgpEjyDvtcF40.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: pop3/imap con mbox

Debian escribió: Buenos días lista. Mi pregunta es bastante simple pero llevó ya varias semanas buscando en google y nada. Existe algún servidor pop3/imap que funcione con mbox (/var/mail/usuario) Agradezco cualquier sugerencia. Buenos días. Que yo sepa dovecot y teapop pueden ser

Re: pop3/imap con mbox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 25/07/07 17:56, Debian escribió: Mi pregunta es bastante simple pero llevó ya varias semanas buscando en google y nada. Existe algún servidor pop3/imap que funcione con mbox (/var/mail/usuario) Hombre... POP3/IMAP, tienes el uw-imapd.

Re: pop3/imap con mbox

Manolo Díaz escribió: Debian escribió: Buenos días lista. Mi pregunta es bastante simple pero llevó ya varias semanas buscando en google y nada. Existe algún servidor pop3/imap que funcione con mbox (/var/mail/usuario) Agradezco cualquier sugerencia. Buenos días. Que yo sepa dovecot y

Re: pop3 consola

El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 21:42, Felipe Törnvall N. escribió: al parecer mutt solo soporta correo local no, prueba mutt -f pops://pop.gmail.com -- Sólo en el diccionario hay éxito antes que trabajo. Rober Morales Chaparro

Re: pop3 consola

aca les mando mi solucion aca les mando mi solucion set from=Felipe Tornvall N. set pgp_decode_command=gpg %?p?--passphrase-fd 0? --no-verbose --batch --output - %f set pgp_verify_command=gpg --no-verbose --batch --output - --verify %s %f set pgp_decrypt_command=gpg --passphrase-fd 0

Re: pop3 consola

El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 15:07, Felipe Törnvall N. escribió: como va lista? el topic lo dice toodooo oigan alguien sabe de un programa para leer pop3 via consola ¿? q soporte pgp... y es posible mime tb gracias ! mutt? saludos cordiales, -- http://www.glugchiloe.net

Re: pop3 consola

al parecer mutt solo soporta correo local saludos ! On Monday 24 April 2006 15:20, marcos toro wrote: El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 15:07, Felipe Törnvall N. escribió: como va lista? el topic lo dice toodooo oigan alguien sabe de un programa para leer pop3 via consola ¿? q

Re: pop3 consola

El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 15:42, Felipe Törnvall N. escribió: al parecer mutt solo soporta correo local saludos ! yo aca uso mutt con imap y tambien con pop3. investiga un poco. saludos cordiales, {...} -- http://www.glugchiloe.net jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BOFH excuse #171:

Re: pop3 consola

vale voi a ver como hacerlo gracias ! On Monday 24 April 2006 15:48, marcos toro wrote: El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 15:42, Felipe Törnvall N. escribió: al parecer mutt solo soporta correo locala saludos ! yo aca uso mutt con imap y tambien con pop3. investiga un poco.

Re: pop3 consola

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 03:42:41PM -0400, Felipe Törnvall N. wrote: al parecer mutt solo soporta correo local Olá No es cierto, soporta POP3 e IMAP. Si tienes instalado el paquete 'mutt', en la documentación encontrarás las respuestas: $ lynx

Re: pop3

Z  wyrazami   szacunku Prezes Marek Poliński Polinski AMT Sp. z o.o. ul. Czeremchowa 7d 03-159 Warszawa Polska tel. +48 22 614 77 01 fax.+48 22 819 06 88 www.polinski.com.pl

Re: POP3 no Debian

Nick Carolino wrote: Só quero receber e-mail de fora. POP3 significa Post Office Protocol versão 3. Você pode compará-lo a uma caixa postal em sua agência mais próxima de correio, no mundo real. Uma vez por dia, ou uma vez por semana, você sai da sua casa e vai até a agência de correio olhar

Re: POP3 no Debian

Boa tarde lista! Acabei de configurar o Postfix aqui em casa. O seviço de smtp esta funcionando corretamente, consigo enviar e-mail para qualker endereço. Mas se uma pessoa resolver retornar o meu e-mail? Como posso configurar o POP3, para receber os emails externos? O que devo usar? Obrigado!

Re: pop3/tcp failing und ipop3d lock

* Michael Gustav Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mein POP3 Dienst erzeugt sporadisch folgende Fehlermeldungen. ... Dec 13 18:33:48 myhost inetd[5829]: pop3/tcp server failing (looping), service terminated Die manpage des inetd als auch google geben über obige Meldung Auskunft.

Re: POP3 no Debian

Nick Carolino wrote: Boa tarde lista! Acabei de configurar o Postfix aqui em casa. O seviço de smtp esta funcionando corretamente, consigo enviar e-mail para qualker endereço. Mas se uma pessoa resolver retornar o meu e-mail? Como posso configurar o POP3, para receber os emails externos? O que

Re: POP3 no Debian

Só quero receber e-mail de fora.Em 30/11/05, Rodolfo Barbosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Nick Carolino wrote: Boa tarde lista! Acabei de configurar o Postfix aqui em casa. O seviço de smtp esta funcionando corretamente, consigo enviar e-mail para qualker endereço. Mas se uma pessoa resolver

Re: POP3 no Debian

Nick Carolino wrote: Só quero receber e-mail de fora. Em 30/11/05, *Rodolfo Barbosa* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Nick Carolino wrote: Boa tarde lista! Acabei de configurar o Postfix aqui em casa. O seviço de smtp esta funcionando corretamente,

Re: POP3 no Debian

Em 29/11/05, Nick Carolino [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Boa tarde lista! Acabei de configurar o Postfix aqui em casa. O seviço de smtp esta funcionando corretamente, consigo enviar e-mail para qualker endereço. Mas se uma pessoa resolver retornar o meu e-mail? Como posso configurar o POP3, para

Re: pop3-server im Nur-Lese-Betrieb?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:45:28PM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: Hallo, gibt es eigentlich einen pop3 Server für Debian, der allerdings nur den Lesebetrieb erlaubt? Just for fun ein kleiner patch angehaengt der aus popa3d den support fuer dele entfernen sollte. Ich wuerd mir aber eher ein

Re: pop3-server im Nur-Lese-Betrieb?

Hallo Gerhard, Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hintergrund: Eigentlich setze ich hier nur IMAP ein. Jetzt wollen wir aber einen Mail Notifier (für Windows) benutzen, der aber nur POP3 spricht (dafür aber mit 33 KB sehr klein ist). imapnotify ist recht klein. Die exe heißt

Re: pop3-server im Nur-Lese-Betrieb?

Gruesse! * Spiro Trikaliotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [16.04.05 20:45]: gibt es eigentlich einen pop3 Server für Debian, der allerdings nur den Lesebetrieb erlaubt? Dazu kann ich leider nichts sagen Hintergrund: Eigentlich setze ich hier nur IMAP ein. Jetzt wollen wir aber einen Mail

Re: Pop3 Fehler - mit welchem Tool manuel lösen?

Hallo, Sprich doch einfach selbst mit dem Pop-Server. Mit $ telnet host port #Port ist idR 110 verbindest Du auf den Server. Die Befehle, die Du sonst noch brauchst sind: user Benutzername pass Passwort list - Gibt eine Liste der vorhandenen Mails zurueck retr Nummer - Gibt eine

Re: Pop3 Fehler - mit welchem Tool manuel lsen?

Salve Alain! Herzlichen Dank! *g* Alain M. Lafon schrieb am Mittwoch, den 16. März 2005 um 20:57h: Hallo, Sprich doch einfach selbst mit dem Pop-Server. Mit $ telnet host port #Port ist idR 110 verbindest Du auf den Server. Die Befehle, die Du sonst noch brauchst sind: user

Re: Pop3 Fehler - mit welchem Tool manuel lösen?

On 16.Mär 2005 - 21:34:54, Robert Michel wrote: B - wäre mir dies mit IMAP nicht passiert? Das kommt drauf an, was genau das Problem mit der Email war... C - mit welchem skript/tool/settings vermeidet man doppelte Mails in seinem Mailverzeichnis. Also ich nehme dazu procmail, da ich

Re: Pop3 Fehler - mit welchem Tool manuel lsen?

Am Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 20:32 schrieb Robert Michel: Salve, ich nutze getmail um meine mails via pop3 abzurufen, bisher nie Probleme gehabt. Hm, ich nehme fetchmail, aber evtl. kannst du das ja auf getmail übernehmen. Heute getmail started for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:110 POP3 greeting:

Re: pop3-client ala fetchmail

Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05.Feb 2005 - 22:25:14, Juergen Salk wrote: * Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050205 20:53]: ich suche nen pop3-client ala fetchmail, der mir die Möglichkeit bietet Mails grösser als xKb nicht automatisch runterzuladen sondern mich zu

Re: pop3-client ala fetchmail

On 05.Feb 2005 - 22:25:14, Juergen Salk wrote: * Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050205 20:53]: ich suche nen pop3-client ala fetchmail, der mir die Möglichkeit bietet Mails grösser als xKb nicht automatisch runterzuladen sondern mich zu fragen (Angabe von From:, To:, Subject:) ? Gibts

Re: pop3-client ala fetchmail

* Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050206 10:28]: ich suche nen pop3-client ala fetchmail, der mir die Möglichkeit bietet Mails grösser als xKb nicht automatisch runterzuladen sondern mich zu fragen (Angabe von From:, To:, Subject:) ? Gibts sowas? Optimal wäre, wenn der trotzdem

Re: pop3-client ala fetchmail

On 06.Feb 2005 - 11:19:56, Juergen Salk wrote: * Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050206 10:28]: Ja, nur funktioniert das soweit ich es sehe nicht so ganz mit fetchall, da ich dann nicht mehr an die Messages rankomm... Hmm, die betreffenden Messages werden laut Manpage nicht als seen

Re: pop3-client ala fetchmail

On 06.Feb 2005 - 11:19:56, Juergen Salk wrote: * Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050206 10:28]: Wie dem auch sei: Vielleicht suchst Du eher sowas wie mailfilter. Beinahe, ich will aber nicht das er die Messages löscht, die sollen nur auf dem Server bleiben. Auf der anderen Seite ist mir

Re: pop3-client ala fetchmail

* Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050205 20:53]: ich suche nen pop3-client ala fetchmail, der mir die Möglichkeit bietet Mails grösser als xKb nicht automatisch runterzuladen sondern mich zu fragen (Angabe von From:, To:, Subject:) ? Gibts sowas? Optimal wäre, wenn der trotzdem automatisch

Re: POP3 geht ohne SSL nicht: Unknown AUTHORIZATION state command - Exim4 und ipop3d

* Martin Jürgens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [041219 01:36]: Wenn ich SSL in meinem E-Mail Client aktiviere, funktioniert alles einwandfrei.Ich würde gerne POP3 auch ohne SSL verwenden, nur finde ich keine Möglichkeit. *hüstel* Du weisst aber schon, dass dann Passwort und Daten im Klartext übertragen

Re: pop3 server????

Sergio Basurto Juarez wrote: Debian: Testing Exim: 4.38 Hello everyone, I have exim configured and working, the question is: exim can be used as a pop3 server? if not, which pop3 server is the best, I will appreciate any feedback. I want the users be able to get the mail from the server via pop3.

Re: pop3 server????

On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 07:29 -0800, Sergio Basurto Juarez wrote: Debian: Testing Exim: 4.38 Hello everyone, I have exim configured and working, the question is: exim can be used as a pop3 server? if not, which pop3 server is the best, I will appreciate any feedback. I want the

  1   2   3   >