Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doofus wrote:
>
> >
> > That was four questions.
> >
> >
> >
> But Passover was last week :-)
No! It was yesterday ;)
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Doofus wrote:
That was four questions.
But Passover was last week :-)
--
Marc Shapiro
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.
What?! Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here.
Boom. Sooner or later ... boom!
- Susan Ivanova: B5 - Grail
--
To U
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:18:48AM +1000, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
> It is much, much better to use native programs, then if you can't find
> native programs for linux, you may give wine a go. Some people must use
> emulators (ie, VMWare), and some (like me) are forever doomed to
>
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:29:08PM -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> thank you roberto and i did not know that i was being
> rude, i will try to remember to bottom post.
I think it's a bit extreme to say top posting is ``rude,'' but I would
certainly agree that it makes reading posts a bit more di
--- "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Xplicit Language wrote:
> > i was wondering, if i remove or completely remove
> > something from synaptic is that uninstalling the
> > program or just deleteing the package, and if it
> does
> > only remove the package, how do i uninstall thi
Xplicit Language wrote:
i was wondering, if i remove or completely remove
something from synaptic is that uninstalling the
program or just deleteing the package, and if it does
only remove the package, how do i uninstall things
like a older version of wine? this help page says that
it is best to
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Miles Bader wrote:
Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
How mature is wine these days? The last time I looked at it
(admittedly a long time ago) it was still a windows 3.1 emulator (when
32 bit windows had long been released). It wasn't particularly stable
eithe
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Out of curiousity, does it still choke on those braindead 16-bit
> installers? I recall a couple of years ago trying to install programs
> that used a 16-bit installer and having the install utterly fail.
No idea, sorry. I've never had problems
Xplicit Language wrote:
> i was wondering, if i remove or completely remove
> something from synaptic is that uninstalling the
> program or just deleteing the package, and if it does
> only remove the package, how do i uninstall things
> like a older version of wine? this help page says that
> it i
i was wondering, if i remove or completely remove
something from synaptic is that uninstalling the
program or just deleteing the package, and if it does
only remove the package, how do i uninstall things
like a older version of wine? this help page says that
it is best to uninstall it, lol i'm star
Miles Bader wrote:
> Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>How mature is wine these days? The last time I looked at it
>>(admittedly a long time ago) it was still a windows 3.1 emulator (when
>>32 bit windows had long been released). It wasn't particularly stable
>>either.
>
>
> 5 years ago win
thats the same reason i want to use wine Christopher
Nelson, but to play medal of honor with or without
gamespy, i am a little addicted to the game, but to
answer, i chose to switch to linux, after years of
hating constantly unstable windows os, winxp has had
the same error twice in a month after g
Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How mature is wine these days? The last time I looked at it
> (admittedly a long time ago) it was still a windows 3.1 emulator (when
> 32 bit windows had long been released). It wasn't particularly stable
> either.
5 years ago wine was pretty flaky. These days
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 00:56:27 +0100, Doofus wrote:
[...]
> How mature is wine these days? The last time I looked at it (admittedly
> a long time ago) it was still a windows 3.1 emulator (when 32 bit
> windows had long been released). It wasn't particularly stable either.
> I've never really
On 4/22/06, Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Nelson wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>also is
> >>anyone familiar with wine?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >As a user. What's your question? If it's generally how to use it, 'wine
> >'. N
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 12:56:27AM +0100, Doofus wrote:
> Christopher Nelson wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> >
> >>also is
> >>anyone familiar with wine?
> >
> >As a user. What's your question? If it's generally how to use it, 'wine
> >'. Not all
Christopher Nelson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
also is
anyone familiar with wine?
As a user. What's your question? If it's generally how to use it, 'wine
'. Not all windows programs work under wine, and
some require tinkering.
How m
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Xplicit Language wrote:
> which program is used to compile
Several. gcc for C code. There are others for C and other languages.
> and how do you
> compile a program,
Depends on how it was set up and where you got it. Often as simple as
'make' 'make in
Xplicit Language wrote:
which program is used to compile
gcc
and how do you
compile a program,
According to the helpful instructions always provided with the source
code (/usr/share/doc/{package_name}).
and how do i run apt get,
apt-get {package_name}
But since you're asking these
Xplicit Language wrote:
> which program is used to compile and how do you
> compile a program, and how do i run apt get, also is
> anyone familiar with wine?
To compile you use a compiler. The most common one is gcc, though there
are others distributed with Debian. Of course, it depends on what
From: "Benjamin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 1:50 AM
Subject: three questions about modules
>1.) the default behavior for debian seems to be to run modprobe on all
>modules listed in /etc/modules at boot time, without -k (autoclean). is
>there a way to change this
* Benjamin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010422 21:35]:
> 1.) the default behavior for debian seems to be to run modprobe on all
> modules listed in /etc/modules at boot time, without -k (autoclean). is
> there a way to change this behavior?
edit /etc/init.d/modutils
> 2.) i've looked through some
if linux had more documentation that would take more of the fun outta it!@
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
Linux System Administrator http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett
> > The poor quality of documentation, such as these "how tos"
> is one of the
> > reasons why I recommend when ever I am asked whether a site
> should move
> > to linux to recommend that they don't.
>
> Although I didn't agree with the tone of this message, I
> definitely think something
> needs t
> The poor quality of documentation, such as these "how tos" is one of the
> reasons why I recommend when ever I am asked whether a site should move
> to linux to recommend that they don't.
Although I didn't agree with the tone of this message, I definitely think
something
needs to be done abou
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 01:53:30AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I was under the _impression_ that people in the Linux community
> were supposed to be helpful. Obviously I was mistaken.
You have probably heard that Linux (and other Unices) are much
more flexible and powerful than WinXX. One
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I was under the _impression_ that people in the Linux community were
: supposed to be helpful. Obviously I was mistaken.
[ snip more of the same ]
: I don't want a long, indepth, very indirect discussion of how to manage
: a network or ethernet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was under the _impression_ that people in the Linux community were
> supposed to be helpful. Obviously I was mistaken.
Sorry to be blunt, but you're acting like the Linux community owes you
something. Everyone here is a volunteer in one way or another.
Occasionall
*- On 8 Oct, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Re: Three questions"
> I was under the _impression_ that people in the Linux community were
> supposed to be helpful. Obviously I was mistaken.
>
> I asked some very specific questions, I hoped to get some helpful
> answers.
I'm sorry that your experience with linux has thus far been so bad. I
understand how frustrating dealing with linux and all these problems might
be. The linux community as a whole is very willing to help, but there are
lots of questions that are commonly asked that are answered in howto and
maili
I was under the _impression_ that people in the Linux community were
supposed to be helpful. Obviously I was mistaken.
I asked some very specific questions, I hoped to get some helpful
answers. Obviously I was mistaken to even bother if I was to simply be
directed to a Howto file.
The poor qual
Take a look at the Ethernet and NETWORK HOWTOs.
> I have a system on which I've just installed debian. It has two network
> cards but during setup only one was recognised. I need to know how to:
>
> 1) Make the system recognise the other network card. Is there a utility
> which probes the card
> 2. After installation is complete, if I want to remove an item from the
> install (I added IPX and don't want it), how do I accomplish this? (I
> only have the basic installation right now... see #3.
Edit /etc/modules and remove the line with ipx
> 3. Due to "factors beyond my control", this L
33 matches
Mail list logo
