On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 16:16:24 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
I would not recomend mixing slink and potato sources. Early in the
potato development this was possible as slink and potato were not too
different and only a few files were updated. But now most files depend
in some way on libc6 v2.1 or
On 04-Dec-1999 Bryan Scaringe wrote:
I have seen many examples on this list of people putting entries in
sources.list
for both stable and unstable trees at the same time. How does apt/dselect
handle this? Would an apt-get upgrade always pull from stable or
unstable?
Thanks in advance.
Opps,
When in doubt, I should read the man pages.
Looks like apt will go through sources.list, and will install the package from
the first source it finds. if I am reading man sources.list correctly :)
Bryan
On 04-Dec-1999 Pollywog wrote:
On 04-Dec-1999 Bryan Scaringe wrote:
I have
On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 03:32:45PM -0500, Bryan Scaringe wrote:
I have seen many examples on this list of people putting entries in
sources.list
for both stable and unstable trees at the same time. How does apt/dselect
handle this? Would an apt-get upgrade always pull from stable or
No, it will install the newest version of whatever it finds. The order
of the listings in sources.list only is important if it finds two
sources for the *exact* same file. The file then will get installed
from the first URI. This is useful if you have a local mirror that may
not be up to date
5 matches
Mail list logo
