Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net writes:
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:42:32AM -0700, sting wing wrote:
Question: how does a person know if their /dev is a static or dynamic /dev
% findmnt /dev
TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS
/dev devtmpfs
What does it mean when /dev is said to be static? dynamic?
What should I be reading about?
On Linux, static tends to be used on embedded systems for speed and
sanity when you know about all the hardware that will be connected and
don't want anything interfering. OpenBSD has a Makedev script
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net writes:
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:42:32AM -0700, sting wing wrote:
Question: how does a person know if their /dev is a static or dynamic /dev
% findmnt /dev
TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS
/dev devtmpfs devtmpfs
2012/10/11 houkensjtu houkens...@gmail.com
Thanks Joe, Brian, Murphy
As I post above, I forgot to say all these experiments were done in my
home on my laptop...
Now I am in my office and re-do all this experiment.
To be short, now all experiment which is done with ip address works well,
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
A bit of searching the net on port-forwarding oughta give you the answer.
You probably forgot to forward port 22 on the router to whichever ip
adress your DEBIAN has.
Search around for stuff on your router/ISP combo as they're almost
always
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
houkensjtu houkens...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi debianer!
I am a newbie both of debian and networking...
Recently I am trying to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my
home) from office. I read several articles on port forwarding. And I
succeeded in
On Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 08:35:13 -0700, houkensjtu wrote:
I am a newbie both of debian and networking... Recently I am trying
to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my home) from office. I
read several articles on port forwarding. And I succeeded in opening
an 22 port on my router, also
On Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 19:44:27 +0100, Joe wrote:
[Some good advice snipped]
However you resolve the initial problem, the ssh server is very heavily
targeted by the bad guys, using password checking bots. A quick and
dirty security measure is to forward a non-standard high numbered
external
Hi Joe!
Thank you for detailed reply!
Actually I found a switch which solved my problem and now all my experiments
works perfectly. The command is:
echo 1/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
but...What is it?! Is there any other way to check and configure my laptop's
status without writing directly
Brian於 2012年10月11日星期四UTC+9上午8時00分04秒寫道：
On Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 08:35:13 -0700, houkensjtu wrote:
I am a newbie both of debian and networking... Recently I am trying
to connect my home laptop(I have a router in my home) from office. I
read several articles on port forwarding. And I
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 08:19:25 PM houkensjtu wrote:
Thanks for great reply!!
I have to apologize for sth... I forgot to say that all these experiments
were done in home on my laptop...omg So, now I solved the problem with
echo 1/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
What is this file? Is
Thanks Joe, Brian, Murphy
As I post above, I forgot to say all these experiments were done in my home on
my laptop...
Now I am in my office and re-do all this experiment.
To be short, now all experiment which is done with ip address works well, while
if I do ssh USER@DEBIAN, it will say:
ssh:
On Sunday 08 April 2007 03:06, Michael M. wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:47 -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
Thanks for taking to time to post all that information. I have installed
Gnome, just haven't figured out how to get it going yet! After reading
your post one of the things that I think
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 16:47 -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
Thanks for taking to time to post all that information. I have installed
Gnome, just haven't figured out how to get it going yet! After reading your
post one of the things that I think I need to do first is read some good
Joe Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because distributions default to something doesn't mean that
other things don't work on them. The beauty of Debian is that almost
everything is available in the repositories. You can use whatever you
feel most comfortable with. The only way you will
Randy Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're better off just installing all three and test them out. I
think they are pretty feature-equivalent these days.
As I had stated previously I installed from the
debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
which sounds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:26:53PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 10:46, John L Fjellstad wrote:
Randy Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had
Sarge installed
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 11:19 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
Yes, I did find that and used it now. But, I did an install of the Gnome
core;
aptitude install gnome-core
The Gnome option doesn't appear under the Session
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 11:19 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
Yes, I did find that and used it now. But, I did an install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:11, Michael Pobega wrote:
As I had stated previously I installed from the
debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
which
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:11, Michael Pobega wrote:
As I had stated previously I installed from the
debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
which sounds like a good one, when I boot will I be given a choice
of which system to start or will I have to manually
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 07:29 -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
On Saturday 07 April 2007 14:41, Michael M. wrote:
snipped Michael's long and very helpful post!
--
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions
of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to
dream. --S.
On Saturday 07 April 2007 10:49, Michael Pobega wrote:
The Gnome option doesn't appear under the Session Type option. I
assume that I haven't installed all the packages needed for Gnome.
What additional packages do I need?
Maybe the gnome-session package? Try that one it, I think
On Thursday 05 April 2007 08:14, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:53:01AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 08:14, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:05:52 -0400
Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:53:01AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 08:14, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy
Keep the following packages at their current version:
fam [Not Installed]
Leave the following dependencies unresolved:
libgnomevfs2-0 recommends fam
nautilus recommends fam
Score is -341
Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
end
I chose not to accept this right now. Do I need to add these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
--
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
No live organism can continue for
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
As stated previously I
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
As stated previously I
Oops! Sorry about that! Kmail gave me an error on the first send so I didn't
think it was sent out.
On Thursday 05 April 2007 07:33, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:33:28AM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:22, Michael M. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:19 -0400, Javier Enrique Tiá Marín wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Mark wrote:
[snip]
As stated previously I am a newbie in the Linux world, but one that seen
enough to know that there is no going back now! So currently I don't really
have a loyalty to any of the higher level window systems. I would be
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:38:13PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
Why Gnome is the Default Desktop for Distributions like Ubuntu/Debian,
RedHat/CentOS/Fedora and OpenSuse?
Because Gnome is superior, of course. :-)
Flamebait! Oh now, now we're going to get a flamewar over which DE is
best.
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:09 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
. gconf spews all sorts of errors into log files.
Not true as of 2.18.0.1-2.
--
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 760BDD22
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:09 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
. gconf spews all sorts of errors into log files.
Not true as of 2.18.0.1-2.
Too bad that this is not in Etch. But good to know.
thanks
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Doug writes:
Minimal command line interface:
no monitor, no graphics card, no terminal, just a
dot matrix printer and a keyboard.
Yup, did that once when I _really_ needed to fix
something.
You really don't want to get into that competition here.
--
Randy Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a
favorite windowing system that I prefer and was
On Thursday 05 April 2007 10:46, John L Fjellstad wrote:
Randy Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I
Randy Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I had stated previously I installed from the
debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso image. If I take your suggestion,
which sounds like a good one, when I boot will I be given a choice of
which system to start or will I have to manually close KDE and
Randy Patterson wrote:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a
favorite windowing system that I prefer and was wondering if
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge installed
but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean install of Etch.
Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a favorite windowing system
El Miércoles, 4 de Abril de 2007 19:09, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi escribió:
Randy Patterson wrote:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 18:09, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Randy Patterson wrote:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge
installed but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean
install of Etch. Works great!! Since I am a new user I don't have a
Randy Patterson wrote:
So would you say in general that the debian-testing-xxx-kde-CD-1.iso image
is for higher end system installs and the debian-testing-xxx-xfce-CD-1.iso
image is for lower end and debian-testing-xxx-netinst.iso image is to
allow for all options?
I do not think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
I have only had Debian up and going for about two weeks. Had Sarge installed
but had problems with my USB hardware so just did a clean install of Etch.
Works great!! Since I am a
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:12:58PM -0500, Randy Patterson wrote:
So would you say in general that the debian-testing-xxx-kde-CD-1.iso image is
for higher end system installs and the debian-testing-xxx-xfce-CD-1.iso image
is for lower end and debian-testing-xxx-netinst.iso image is to allow
Michael Pobega wrote:
On 02/17/2007 08:52:31 AM, Jan Sneep wrote:
[...]
If you use iTunes to download music you're out of luck, because there
are almost no Linux equivalents. If your kids only use iTunes to
update their iPods, then there is always gtkpod, which is what I
personally use to
On 02/17/2007 08:52:31 AM, Jan Sneep wrote:
Well two weeks ago I successfully installed Debian for the first time
(first
time for any Linux OS for that matter) and thanks to the replies to my
last
question I've got Samba up and working beautifully and this week-end
I'm
going to get CUPS
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:52:31 -0500
Jan Sneep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and for the second part to my question ...
How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment they use
my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
doesn't run on ME. I have to
On 17-feb-2007, at 14:52, Jan Sneep wrote:
snippage
How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment
they use
my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
doesn't run on ME. I have to re-boot my machine after they're done
because
some iTunes
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 08:52 -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment they use
my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
doesn't run on ME. I have to re-boot my machine after they're done because
some iTunes service
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 16:30 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 08:52 -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
How about iTunes for loading songs onto their iPods? At the moment they use
my Windows Xp machine to fill up their iPods, because of course iTunes
doesn't run on ME. I have to
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:52:31AM -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
Well two weeks ago I successfully installed Debian for the first time (first
time for any Linux OS for that matter)
congrats!! welcome to freedom...
Inspired with my recent success installing Debian on one machine I was
thinking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:52:31AM -0500, Jan Sneep wrote:
Well two weeks ago I successfully installed Debian for the first time (first
time for any Linux OS for that matter)
congrats!! welcome to freedom...
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:41:29PM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected
by the server. The rejected email-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Subject 'test', Account: 'blah', Server: 'mail.bigpond.com', Protocol:
SMTP,
On Wed January 10 2007 04:41, Duncan McDonald wrote:
Hi all,
I'm relatively new to Debian administration and I've recently encountered a
problem with Exim which has me stumped. While I can send email directly
from the server to external recipients and also from other computers within
the
- Original Message -
From: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian list debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
no server error, and the fact that you later say you see nothing
From: Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
Just a shot in the dark. If exim4 is set to listen to 127.0.0.1 it will
only
accept connections from
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:54:44AM +1100, Duncan McDonald
wrote:
I actually set the 'listening' addresses option to blank.
I believe this means that my server should be listening on
all available network addresses shouldn't it?
Yes, and you can verify this using lsof -ni:25 | grep
LISTEN,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:47:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
no server error, and the fact that you later say you
see nothing in your exim4 logs make me wonder if you've
setup MX records for your domain to point to the IP
address of your server?
In the absence of MX records, mailers
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:52:01AM +1100, Duncan McDonald
wrote:
As I said I'm fairly new to system administration so I'm
not sure what an MX record is.
Domains are mapped to IP addresses via DNS records. DNS
records come in a variety of types: the most common being
the 'A' record, which
A useful function is
# dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed January 10 2007 05:54, Duncan McDonald wrote:
From: Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
Just a shot in the dark. If exim4 is set
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:06:20PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:52:01AM +1100, Duncan McDonald
wrote:
As I said I'm fairly new to system administration so I'm
not sure what an MX record is.
Domains are mapped to IP addresses via DNS records. DNS
records come in a
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:33:04 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[ snip: Jon Dowland's nice mini-tutorial about dig and MX records ]
okay, so I had to try this to learn and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig +short bigpond.com mx
10 extmail.bigpond.com.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
okay, so I had to try this to learn and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig +short
On Wed January 10 2007 09:37, Duncan McDonald wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
okay, so I had
- Original Message -
From: Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
It was a common practice in my area that ISP's would block ports like 25
so
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:37:55AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
okay
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:19:46AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
On Wed January 10 2007 10:19, Duncan McDonald wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
...
It was a common
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
so you can get to the machine, i.e. the port is not blocked. can you
On Wed January 10 2007 11:00, Duncan McDonald wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
so you can get
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:00:10 +1100
Duncan McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming
- Original Message -
From: Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:00:10 +1100
Duncan McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:00:10AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
so
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:21:09AM +1100, Duncan McDonald wrote:
From: Andrei Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:00:10 +1100
Duncan McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so you can get to the machine, i.e. the port is not blocked. can
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie question: Exim - trouble receiving incoming emails
No I was just asking. I'm just trying to figure out why I can send email
[ apologies for the long time since replying ]
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
/etc/default/bootlogd.
It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your suggestion
-
but why
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I'll echo the question about where to find that out other than a helpful
reply on this list.
A manpage does not always include specific info about how things are set
up in Debian, unfortunately. (You can file a wishlist bug asking the
package maintainer to include
Ooops. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
Editing /etc/default/bootlod to set
BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes
Works like a charm.
Miles
Willie Wonka wrote:
[ apologies for the long time since replying ]
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Ooops. I guess I wasn't as clear as I could have been.
Editing /etc/default/bootlod to set
BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=yes
Works like a charm.
Miles
Thanks for clarifying that for me ;-)
Regards
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
/etc/default/bootlogd.
It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your suggestion -
but why wouldn't the man page say how to enable it? Or where should I look for
that kind of
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 15:15:40 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Willie Wonka wrote:
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
/etc/default/bootlogd.
It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your
suggestion -
but why wouldn't the man
Wulfy wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the
log files - guess I have to connect
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the log
files - guess I have to connect my laptop to the serial port
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Wulfy wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the
log
Wulfy wrote:
man bootlogd it's part of the sysvinit package... :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S bootlogd
sysvinit: /sbin/bootlogd
initscripts: /etc/init.d/bootlogd
initscripts: /etc/init.d/stop-bootlogd
initscripts: /etc/default/bootlogd
sysvinit: /usr/share/man/man8/bootlogd.8.gz
On 07/21/2006 09:31 AM, Willie Wonka wrote:
[...]
So I drop to a VT/VC (ctrl-alt-f2) and login as root;
then rerun above command '/sbin/bootlogd -lps'
and it *seems* to have taken affect -- but i guess i won't know for sure until
I reboot...well here goes ;-)
Regards
AFAIK, that's not the
Mumia W. wrote:
AFAIK, that's not the way you enable boot-logging. Just edit
/etc/default/bootlogd.
It did not take affect after a warm (re)boot -- so I'll try your suggestion -
but why wouldn't the man page say how to enable it? Or where should I look for
that kind of info instead?
I'm
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 17:01 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
Are there some settings that control what's logged at boot time?
Hope this helps:
man syslog.conf
man sysklogd
Cheers.
PS: next time it would be better that you read the documentation and
google for a while before you ask. Some
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 17:01 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
Are there some settings that control what's logged at boot time?
Hope this helps:
man syslog.conf
man sysklogd
Cheers.
PS: next time it would be better that you read the documentation and
google for a
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the log
files - guess I have to connect my laptop to the serial port and
capture the console
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the log
files - guess I have to connect my laptop to the serial port and
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 22:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
and it turns out that it sure looks like the messages I'm trying to
capture are generated too early in the startup process to hit the
log files - guess I have to connect my laptop to
Marco Prandini wrote:
Hello,
I'm switching to Debian after a long time on RedHat, and I haven't
been able to find a couple of functions of the package manager I'd
like to use... hoping they exist at all!
1) I'd like to find which files of a package have been altered with
respect to the
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
