RE: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-02-12 Thread Larry Fletcher
I searched through all of the old messages on this subject and couldn't find a fix for the problem, except using another time server. My problem is I'm behind a firewall and can only use a local time server that won't work with rdate. Has rdate been fixed yet? If so, is there somewhere can I

RE: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-02-12 Thread Johann Spies
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Larry Fletcher wrote: I searched through all of the old messages on this subject and couldn't find a fix for the problem, except using another time server. My problem is I'm behind a firewall and can only use a local time server that won't work with rdate. Has rdate

Re: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-01-02 Thread Bob Nielsen
It's working now: # rdate time.nist.gov Sat Jan 1 20:12:01 2000 On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 05:06:59PM -, Pollywog wrote: On 01-Jan-2000 Pann McCuaig wrote: # ping time.nist.gov PING time.nist.gov (192.43.244.18): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=85.3 ms

Re: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-01-01 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 08:35:10AM -0800, Pann McCuaig wrote: # ping time.nist.gov PING time.nist.gov (192.43.244.18): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=85.3 ms 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=92.2 ms --- time.nist.gov ping statistics ---

RE: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-01-01 Thread Pollywog
On 01-Jan-2000 Pann McCuaig wrote: # ping time.nist.gov PING time.nist.gov (192.43.244.18): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=85.3 ms 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=92.2 ms --- time.nist.gov ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2

Re: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-01-01 Thread Pollywog
On 01-Jan-2000 Ben Collins wrote: After looking at the source, it seems that either time.nist.gov was returning too much data, or none at all. Note, this worked when I used my ISP's local Solaris time server, so this isn't a problem in rdate itself, it has something to do with the

Re: rdate fails Y2K?

2000-01-01 Thread Pann McCuaig
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:51, Ben Collins wrote: On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 08:35:10AM -0800, Pann McCuaig wrote: # ping time.nist.gov PING time.nist.gov (192.43.244.18): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=85.3 ms 64 bytes from 192.43.244.18: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47