Yes. It happened to me on Wed. I'm using 2.0.36. I figured it was a blunder and would be replaced within a day or two. The version just before this one worked fine.
jim >---------- >From: Jens B. Jorgensen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 1:32 PM >To: Debian Users >Cc: The recipient's address is unknown. >Subject: samba: anyone else get "Can't become connected user!" with >potato >version 2.0.4b-3 & kernel 2.0.34? > >I upgraded a box to potato and now samba doesn't work. I've looked in >the samba archives and the postings I found suggest that this is because >the newer versions of samba use a setresuid call (or don't) and get a >bad return value (http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-ntdom/1639.html). >One user says that upgrading the kernel fixed the problem. Well, I'm not >ready to upgrade my kernel. So does anyone else seen this? > >-- >Jens B. Jorgensen >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >-- >Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < >/dev/null > >
