On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:42:58PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 3) The Debian community would be much better served
> >a) by the creation now of two new mailing lists, called:
> > 1) debian-user-woody, or po
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon wrote:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
It's come up before, and it still sounds like a thoroughly dreadful
ide
on Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
>
> Summary:
>
> 1) The Debian user community is s
On Monday 01 December 2003 11:28, Hereon wrote:
> 1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
> with the existence of the current debian-user list.
As some debian users post to debian-user without being subscribed, they
request to be cc'ed by the helpers. As said users ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:09:41PM +, Siraj 'Sid' Rakhada wrote:
> I think maybe a single new list should be created -
> debian-user-unstable, or maybe just debian-unstable, for... well
> unstable people ;)
Well, debian-devel is the unstable mai
Am 2003-12-02 11:20:24, schrieb Michael Perry:
>I think that this is a good idea overall. Since I also track a bit of
>freebsd stuff, I always liked their approach to having email lists for
I am on FreeBSD and NetBSD Lists... ;-)
>Perhaps there should be a discussion whether a debian-question
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:02:50PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Which mean, that even if someone like to install SLINK on a
> 486, the Mailinglist will still availlable. For peoples
> which are willing to Help it will no problenm, because the
> traffic are naturaly decreasing on older Versio
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Attention: Please Cc me if you answer from debian-user (curently I am
== not subscribed, because the traffic and an ADSL Problem)
Am 2003-12-01 10:40:40, schrieb Tim Folger:
This is a very good idea. It might be easiest if the lists were named
debian-stable, d
Attention: Please Cc me if you answer from debian-user (curently I am
== not subscribed, because the traffic and an ADSL Problem)
Am 2003-12-01 10:40:40, schrieb Tim Folger:
>This is a very good idea. It might be easiest if the lists were named
>debian-stable, debian-testing, and debi
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:52:23PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800 "Hereon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Request For Comment on:
> > Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> > Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> > and deactiv
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800, Hereon wrote:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
>
> Summary:
>
> 1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:35:02AM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2003 04:28, Hereon wrote:
> > Request For Comment on:
> > Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> > Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> > and deactivating debian-user.
>
>
Hereon wrote:
Debian stable releases have been approximately 1-2 years apart. During
this period of time, many Debian users make active use of the
testing/unstable system.
Currently, user questions about testing/unstable are likely to be asked
in the debian-user list.
But, that is definitely not t
On Monday 01 December 2003 04:28, Hereon wrote:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
I say leave well enough alone. I like being able to get all my answers in one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Hereon wrote:
> 1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
>with the existence of the current debian-user list.
Howso? If you're going to make those claims, back it up.
> 2) The de
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800,
"Hereon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
>
> Summary:
>
> 1)
I disagree with this request. See below for my reasons.
Hereon wrote:
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptima
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800
"Hereon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
>
And the people running mixed systems?
I'm running sta
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800
"Hereon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Request For Comment on:
> Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> and deactivating debian-user.
I can see what motivates the proposal, and I can see th
Hi there,
--On Monday, December 1, 2003 2:28 -0800 Hereon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
3) The Debian community would be much better served
a) by the creation now of two new mailing lists, called:
1) debian-user-woody, or possibly debian-user-stable,
or possibly debian-user-3
Request For Comment on:
Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
and deactivating debian-user.
Summary:
1) The Debian user community is substantially suboptimally served
with the existence of the current debian-user list.
2)
21 matches
Mail list logo
