Re: RFC: Linux compatibility test framework (was: Re: OT: Letter to TigerDirect)

2003-12-14 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:35:06AM -0600, Terry Hancock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2003 02:16 am, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 11:15:07AM -0600, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > John Hasler wrote: > > > >Terry writes: > > > >>Now, if you are j

Re: RFC: Linux compatibility test framework (was: Re: OT: Letter to TigerDirect)

2003-12-14 Thread Terry Hancock
On Sunday 14 December 2003 02:16 am, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 11:15:07AM -0600, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > John Hasler wrote: > > >Terry writes: > > >>Now, if you are just doing this "in good faith" or making a "best > > >>effort", you're asking for a lawsuit t

RFC: Linux compatibility test framework (was: Re: OT: Letter to TigerDirect)

2003-12-14 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 11:15:07AM -0600, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > John Hasler wrote: > > >Terry writes: > > > > > >>Now, if you are just doing this "in good faith" or making a "best > >>effort", you're asking for a lawsuit the first time somebody buys your > >>stuff and can't get t