Re: RUS-CERT: Several Debian hosts compromised, archive not affected

2003-11-26 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:48:37AM -0500, Andrew Schulman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt [Note: The original announcement didn't have a GnuPG signature.]

Re: RUS-CERT: Several Debian hosts compromised, archive not affected

2003-11-25 Thread Andrew Schulman
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt [Note: The original announcement didn't have a GnuPG signature.] Why did the original announcement not have a GnuPG signature? Is no one else bothered by

Re: RUS-CERT: Several Debian hosts compromised, archive not affected

2003-11-25 Thread Carl Fink
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:48:37AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: ... Why has there been no announcement on debian.org? There has. It's in the News section. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading http://www.jabootu.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

RUS-CERT: Several Debian hosts compromised, archive not affected

2003-11-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt [Note: The original announcement didn't have a GnuPG signature.] From: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Some Debian Project machines have been