It is also more
space appropriate to do this headless than to go with a separate
traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking into more
headaches than I can guess at at present.
Hi Mark,
Given that you are putting all this in a rack, Have you considered using a
KVM switch,
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
It is also more
space appropriate to do this headless than to go with a separate
traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking into more
headaches than I can guess at at present.
Hi Mark,
Given that you are putting all this
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
It is also more
space appropriate to do this headless than to go with a separate
traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking into more
headaches than I can guess at at present.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:46:14PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:48, Carel Fellinger wrote:
...
Here me English is lacking, atleast I can't parse the above.
...
Yeah, I did say something weird there :)
...sniped the explanation
Okee, I see. In my experience most
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:09, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
It is also more
space appropriate to do this headless than to go with a separate
traditional box/monitor/keyboard, so long as I'm not walking
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 16:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:09, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 04:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:15, Lee W wrote:
It is also more
space appropriate to do this headless than to go with a separate
I'm looking at putting a couple rack mounted systems in as a
reorganisation of my computing environment - one an SMP IA32 type system
(we'll see how many CPUs make sense) running as a file and computing
server with Debian GNU/Linux, and the other likely only one CPU at
present to run as an
Mark L. Kahnt said:
a separate machine? I know that Lilo and Grub do have the serial option
for sending the info to another machine (I'm hoping that means that
Minicom would handle it fine.) Any heads-up of use, given that it is one
I haven't tried GRUB, but with LILO the serial options
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:59:15PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
..
The current desktop box would become a combination firewall and X
terminal, but it all raises one key question: with the second rack
computer being meant to be rebooted regularly as I switch between
various o/s, how reliable is
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:18:58AM -0800, nate wrote:
Mark L. Kahnt said:
a separate machine? I know that Lilo and Grub do have the serial option
for sending the info to another machine (I'm hoping that means that
Minicom would handle it fine.) Any heads-up of use, given that it is one
Carel Fellinger said:
This I find hard to believe, did you try to send a break? According to
the lilo docs one needs to send a break instead of pressing shift to get
lilo's attention.
no, haven't tried that:)
thanks
nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:48, Carel Fellinger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:59:15PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
..
The current desktop box would become a combination firewall and X
terminal, but it all raises one key question: with the second rack
computer being meant to be rebooted
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carel Fellinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:18:58AM -0800, nate wrote:
I haven't tried GRUB, but with LILO the serial options doesn't let me
interact with lilo, it just spits the information out to the serial port.
This I find hard to
13 matches
Mail list logo
