Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]]

2016-03-15 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 16 March 2016 00:42:48 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 3/15/2016 11:45 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 10:35:12 Richard Owlett wrote: > >> On 3/15/2016 3:57 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> [snip] > >> > >>> The BBC isn't going to take a blind bit of notice if Brian and I

Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]]

2016-03-15 Thread Richard Owlett
On 3/15/2016 11:45 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Tuesday 15 March 2016 10:35:12 Richard Owlett wrote: On 3/15/2016 3:57 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: [snip] The BBC isn't going to take a blind bit of notice if Brian and I don't watch Happy Valley. It really isn't going to care. It has its licence money.

Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]]

2016-03-15 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 10:35:12 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 3/15/2016 3:57 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > [snip] > > > The BBC isn't going to take a blind bit of notice if Brian and I don't > > watch Happy Valley. It really isn't going to care. It has its licence > > money. > > > > Even Channel 4,

Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]]

2016-03-15 Thread Richard Owlett
On 3/15/2016 9:09 AM, deloptes wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: On 3/15/2016 3:57 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: [snip] The BBC isn't going to take a blind bit of notice if Brian and I don't watch Happy Valley. It really isn't going to care. It has its licence money. Even Channel 4, which relies on

Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]]

2016-03-15 Thread deloptes
Richard Owlett wrote: > On 3/15/2016 3:57 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > [snip] >> >> The BBC isn't going to take a blind bit of notice if Brian and I don't >> watch >> Happy Valley. It really isn't going to care. It has its licence money. >> >> Even Channel 4, which relies on advertising for its