On Saturday 23 July 2016 14:02:55 Hans wrote:
> Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016, 08:38:02 schrieb S. P. Molnar:
> > I am running v-8.4 and get the following error:
> >
> > E: The package virtualbox-5.1 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find
> > an archive for it.
> >
> > This resulted from my
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016, 08:38:02 schrieb S. P. Molnar:
> I am running v-8.4 and get the following error:
>
> E: The package virtualbox-5.1 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find
> an archive for it.
>
> This resulted from my bumbling effort to remove virtualbox.
>
> What is the solution
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca
All of these searches return nothing:
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ apt-show-versions | grep unstable
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ aptitude search ~Aunstable
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ aptitude search ~Aunstable~i
stuc...@debian:~/tmp$ aptitude search '?narrow(?archive(unstable),
?installed)'
I know something must
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:09:32PM +0200, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com
was heard to say:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
Did you mean to drop debian-user?
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 06:29:55PM +0200, James Stuckey
jhstuc...@gmail.com was
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:09:32PM +0200, James Stuckey
jhstuc...@gmail.com was heard to say:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
wrote:
Did you mean to drop debian-user?
On
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:23:12PM +0200, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com
was heard to say:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
That's the problem -- you have no (active) deb lines for unstable,
so apt doesn't know which packages are from it.
The
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:58, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why am I getting this and how can I fix it?
r...@debian:/home/stuckey# aptitude install fakeroot devscripts
build-essential
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Have you tried apt-get update or aptitude update before trying to
install these packages?
Yes, I did aptitude safe-upgrade after aptitude update and then
aptitude full-upgrade.
I selected n and it prompted me to downgrade the packages to testing.
This means that the versions it had were
Try
apt-get install fakeroot devscripts build-essential
If it gives error then post your /etc/apt/sources.list
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:07 PM, James Stuckey jhstuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried apt-get update or aptitude update before trying to
install these packages?
Yes, I did
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Kousik Maiti kousiks...@gmail.com wrote:
Try
apt-get install fakeroot devscripts build-essential
If it gives error then post your /etc/apt/sources.list
I selected n and it prompted me to downgrade the packages to testing.
This means that the versions it
That looks like a problem. You have unstable version of gcc-4.4-base
(4.4.3-9) installed, but now your unstable/sid is commented out. So
when you try to install g++ which has dependency on gcc-4.4-base, it
is trying to revert the gcc-4.4-base to that of squeeze (4.4.2-9).
Install the package
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Anand Sivaram aspn...@gmail.com wrote:
That looks like a problem. You have unstable version of gcc-4.4-base
(4.4.3-9) installed, but now your unstable/sid is commented out. So
when you try to install g++ which has dependency on gcc-4.4-base, it
is trying to
On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing.
Er, mostly.
If there is a versioned dependency that can be satisfied from sid but not
testing, you will
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing.
Er, mostly.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:14, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
release will keep the system tracked to, in this case, testing.
Er, mostly.
If
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram aspn...@gmail.com wrote:
You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
apt-show-versions | grep unstable
Or aptitude search ~Aunstable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Friday 30 April 2010 12:10:45 James Stuckey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
The unstable/sid doesn't have to be comment out. Setting the default
release will keep the
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Friday 30 April 2010 12:10:45 James Stuckey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Friday 30 April 2010 06:16:22 James Stuckey wrote:
The
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 00:08, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Friday 30 April 2010 12:10:45 James Stuckey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was heard
to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram aspn...@gmail.com wrote:
You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
apt-show-versions | grep unstable
Or aptitude search
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net was heard to say:
My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of all
packages from the $something repository, which may make the dependency
resolver pull more from that
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram aspn...@gmail.com wrote:
You could find what all packages from sid are installed in your system by
apt-show-versions | grep unstable
Or aptitude
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:58:19PM -0700, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
was heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
b...@iguanasuicide.net was heard to say:
My instinct is that '-t $something' effectively increases the priority of
all
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca was
heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram aspn...@gmail.com wrote:
You could find what all
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:10:56 -0700 dburr...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:04:07AM -0400, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca
was heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram aspn...@gmail.com
wrote:
You could find what all packages from sid are installed
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:37:24AM -0400, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca was
heard to say:
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:10:56 -0700 dburr...@debian.org wrote:
$ aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)'
debian01:~# aptitude search '?narrow('?archive(unstable), ?installed)'
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:46:13AM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was heard
to say:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Mike Viau vi...@sheridanc.on.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 01:26:45PM -0400, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Anand Sivaram
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 09:13, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:
For quite some time now I've been seeing the following lines when I
upgrade packages:
database /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db failed to load.
Exception bsddb.db.DBRunRecoveryError: DBRunRecoveryError(-30975,
'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal
[Please don't hijack threads]
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:17:14PM +0800, Fan Liu wrote:
Hi all,
I encountered such an error when I try to upgrade my debian lenny.
Writing extended state information... Error!
E: The package index files are corrupted. No Filename: field for package
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:17:14PM +0800, Fan Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard
to say:
Hi all,
I encountered such an error when I try to upgrade my debian lenny.
Writing extended state information... Error!
E: The package index files are corrupted. No Filename: field for package
33 matches
Mail list logo
