El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió:
(resending to the list)
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:44:33 Camaleón wrote:
But it's her backup and her data. She should care about how to do
things like these, whatever place she is (home, university, work...).
I was forgetting that school
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 08:41:03 Camaleón wrote:
El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió:
(resending to the list)
Sorry. I debated whether to send it to you or the list, and decided that it
was OT for the list since I was commenting on a specific sentence of your
that wasn't
Ron Johnson put forth on 6/15/2010 10:59 AM:
I wrote a script that only backs up our data directories (including much
of /home) into a bunch of tarballs, excluding junk folders like
caches, thumbnails, trash, etc, and compressing most but not stuff like
image and OOo document directories.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:05:56 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 08:41:03 Camaleón wrote:
El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió:
(resending to the list)
Sorry. I debated whether to send it to you or the list, and decided
that it was OT for the list since I was
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:14:22 Camaleón wrote:
but I asked you why you were so reluctant to use
differential backups on her computer. I couldn't understand why because
today backup tasks are just point-and-click, I mean, they are easier to
achieve than any image generation of the whole
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:14:22 Camaleón wrote:
Many people send the replies to me directly and I am not sure
whether if they are full aware of that (intentionally off-list) or this
is just the famous Gmail's webmail non-reply-to-list-but-sender
error :-)
I forgot that Gmail does that. ;-)
On 06/16/2010 05:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ron Johnson put forth on 6/15/2010 10:59 AM:
I wrote a script that only backs up our data directories (including much
of /home) into a bunch of tarballs, excluding junk folders like
caches, thumbnails, trash, etc, and compressing most but not stuff
On 15/06/10 14:31, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:02:47PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
The real magic command is cp -alf which essentially merges a shorter
term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter
store has a
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Please excuse the thread breaking. I have suddenly been being rejected by the
list server and am sending for the third time. I hope that the list server
is now happy with my SMTP settings.
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56
On 15/06/10 11:36, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my
granddaughter's large
On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
The real magic command is cp -alf which essentially merges a shorter
term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter
store has a file that isn't in the longer term store, and overwriting it
where the shorter term store has a file
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:02:47PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
The real magic command is cp -alf which essentially merges a shorter
term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter
store has a file that isn't in the longer term
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:32:15 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem
for my
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:32:15 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to
On 06/15/2010 05:32 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my
granddaughter's
On 06/15/2010 09:48 AM, Lisi wrote:
Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
quote
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
/quote
I can think of very few - and was interested in what he was thinking of.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
I would differentiate between backup data and archived data.
(...)
Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
quote
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/15/2010 05:32 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this
problem for my
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
I would differentiate between backup data and archived data.
(...)
Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
quote
On 06/15/2010 12:49 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
I would differentiate between backup data and archived data.
(...)
Thanks for this. I was originally
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/15/2010 09:48 AM, Lisi wrote:
Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
quote
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
/quote
I can think of
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:27:47PM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Please excuse the thread breaking. I have suddenly been being rejected by
the
list server and am sending for the third time. I hope that the list server
is
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:49:25 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
Why not practical? Just curious O:-)
Because I shan't have hold of the computer for long enough or often
enough!
But it's her backup and her data. She should care about how to do
things like
On 06/15/2010 01:18 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
I think the OP said something like: I have 1.3 TB and it's too big to
backup. This of course is patently ridiculous. meh.
Right. You're a fool to buy a Lexus if you can't afford the (way
more than bare legal minimum) auto
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:09:28 Ron Johnson wrote:
*Teach* her. She's in Uni, correct? Thus, she should be
responsible enough to take care of her own data by sticking in a USB
drive and running a script.
Two people divided by a common language
No, she's at school, where school in this
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:09:28 Ron Johnson wrote:
*Teach* her. She's in Uni, correct? Thus, she should be
responsible enough to take care of her own data by sticking in a USB
drive and running a script.
Two people divided by a common language
No, she's at school, where school in this
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my
usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when
it hasn't or vice versa.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 06/15/2010 05:02 PM, Lisi wrote:
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my
usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when
it hasn't or vice versa.
Something like that happened to me a year or so ago when my ISP got
much
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:49:25PM +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
I would differentiate between backup data and archived data.
(...)
Thanks for
29 matches
Mail list logo
