On 08/03/2012 08:05 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I have configured 2 vlan interfaces on debian lenny box. The 2
interface ip's are 192.168.6.5 and 192..168.8.5. I would like making
dns queries from this ip 192.168.6.5. What can be done to ensure that
a dns query is made using specific response
Roman,
I've never tried this myself, but I think that other option would be
to use iptables' OUTPUT chain with -o your virtual interface. You
can also restrict this rule to filter only DNS ports and so on.
Another option is to use static routes, like Mihamina suggested.
Cheers,
On Fri, Aug 3,
* Old Crankbuster crankbus...@gmail.com [2009-05-17 10:22:21 +0700]:
* Michael M. Moore mich...@writemoore.net [2009-05-16 16:20:28 -0700]:
(suggested disabling ipv6 entirely)
I'm seeing almost exactly the same thing in Fedora 11, and we're working
on that one in those lists. I think
* Old Crankbuster crankbus...@gmail.com [2009-05-17 10:29:04 +0700]:
Ah. But this a standard install with no proxy, upgraded to Sid. The
difference between this side and that side is that I run bind9 on this
side as caching nameserver on this box... Waitaminnit
For grins, I just
* Peter Crawford creature...@hotmail.com [2009-05-14 10:49:54 -0700]:
Does /etc/hosts begin thus?
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
127.0.1.1mycomputer.invalidmycomputer
If so, try commenting the 2nd line.
Tried the above, to no avail, so have reverted to original
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 13:16 +0700, Old Crankbuster wrote:
* Peter Crawford creature...@hotmail.com [2009-05-14 10:49:54 -0700]:
Does /etc/hosts begin thus?
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
127.0.1.1mycomputer.invalidmycomputer
If so, try commenting the 2nd
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Michael M. Moore wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 13:16 +0700, Old Crankbuster wrote:
* Peter Crawford creature...@hotmail.com [2009-05-14 10:49:54 -0700]:
[snip]
Interestingly, have been able to solve the surfing problem in iceweasel
by setting
* Michael M. Moore mich...@writemoore.net [2009-05-16 16:20:28 -0700]:
Out of curiosity, if you ping the repositories first, then run apt-get
update, does it resolve properly and proceed with the update?
Nope, no joy. The repos do resolve with ping, however. There seems to
be something
* Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au [2009-05-17 10:53:31 +1000]:
you realise when you use a proxy the proxy does the name resolution.
also apt can be set to use a proxy as well in apt.conf and the
environment.
Ah. But this a standard install with no proxy, upgraded to Sid. The
difference
On Thu,14.May.09, 10:30:44, Old Crankbuster wrote:
[DNS troubles in sid]
What do I need to look at?
Maybe this NEWS entry?
,[ /usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian ]
| glibc (2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low
|
| Starting with version 2.9-8, unified IPv4/IPv6 lookup have been enabled
| in the
* Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com [2009-05-14 08:59:58 +0300]:
Maybe this NEWS entry?
,[ /usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian ]
| glibc (2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low
|
| Starting with version 2.9-8, unified IPv4/IPv6 lookup have been enabled
| in the glibc's resolver. This is
What is the outcome of the command
dig +short domainname_of_failing_site
or alternatively
nslookup domainname_of_failing_site
?
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
* Jörg-Volker Peetz jvpe...@web.de [2009-05-14 12:17:01 +0200]:
What is the outcome of the command
dig +short domainname_of_failing_site
or alternatively
nslookup domainname_of_failing_site
?
# apt-get update:
(truncated, all repositories return the same)
Err
* Old Crankbuster crankbus...@gmail.com [2009-05-14 19:22:14 +0700]:
$ nslookup security.debian.org
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
Oops wrong output, should read:
Server: 192.168.1.1
Address:192.168.1.1#53
--
Cheers
signature.asc
* Old Crankbuster crankbus...@gmail.com [2009-05-14 19:25:48 +0700]:
* Old Crankbuster crankbus...@gmail.com [2009-05-14 19:22:14 +0700]:
$ nslookup security.debian.org
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
Oops wrong output, should read:
Server:
This doesn't look like a problem with DNS.
But what could it be?
Does /etc/hosts begin thus?
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
127.0.1.1mycomputer.invalidmycomputer
If so, try commenting the 2nd line.
Regards, ... p. crawford
Sorry, that was not quite right. nslookup did eventually return, with:
*** Can't find server name for address ...: No response from server
for all three servers I have in my /etc/resolv.conf file, which are working
fine.
I can ping these same servers just fine, so I don't think it's a routing
please include a copy of your resolv.conf ..you may have something
mispselled or not right ..
nate
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Guyren G Howe wrote:
guyren Sorry, that was not quite right. nslookup did eventually return, with:
guyren
guyren *** Can't find server name for address ...: No response from
The /etc/resolv.conf file contains both those servers?
From: Rudy Broersma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian User List debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: DNS Lookups
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 22:44:53 +0200
Hi,
My linux boxes can't perform DNS lookups. For example, if I want to mount
an
SMB
George == George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George Microsoft will not invent DNS until NT5. Easy way is to
George simply insert the IP adddesses into the /etc/hosts file OR
George buy the book DNS and BIND from www.ora.com and learn how
George to build your own DNS server.
Or just
20 matches
Mail list logo
