On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:19:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 07:18 AM, Camaleón wrote:
What part of Cultural Imperialism don't you understand???
:)
A Spaniard would be vaguely familiar with the concept ;-)
And I'd have to say that *sadly* (IMO, nothing to be proud about) yes,
On 04/04/2011 09:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:19:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 07:18 AM, Camaleón wrote:
What part of Cultural Imperialism don't you understand???
:)
A Spaniard would be vaguely familiar with the concept ;-)
And I'd have to say that
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:05:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 09:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
A Spaniard would be vaguely familiar with the concept ;-)
And I'd have to say that *sadly* (IMO, nothing to be proud about)
yes, we do are ;-(
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural
Hello Lisi,
Am 2011-04-01 10:17:42, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
Perhaps on an international list we should say the month names as Liam has
here. Otherwise one is playing guessing games to work out the upbringing of
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
wouldn't be here using using computers and (where it's hot) availing
ourselves of air conditioning.
...what's air conditioning? Yesterday, it was 42°C and windy, I just
opened
On 04/04/2011 01:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
wouldn't be here using using computers and (where it's hot) availing
ourselves of air conditioning.
...what's air conditioning?
On 04/04/2011 05:27 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 01:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
wouldn't be here using using computers and (where it's hot) availing
ourselves of air
On 04/04/2011 09:13 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 05:27 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/04/2011 01:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/03/2011 12:19 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Any expanding civilization engages in Cultural Imperialism. W/o it, we
wouldn't be here using using computers and
On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that case,
context made the date's form redundant, but it _is_ a problem. Not major
one, a very minor one. But a problem -
On 03/04/11 16:54, Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that case,
context made the date's form redundant, but it _is_ a problem. Not major
one, a
On 3 April 2011 19:06, Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.comwrote:
On 03/04/11 16:54, Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that
case,
On Sunday 03 April 2011 10:06:39 Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 03/04/11 16:54, Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:20:10 Scott Ferguson wrote:
I suspect Liam's response was made in jest :-)
I'm sure it was - and a successful jest. But mine was not. In that
case, context made the date's
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:19:49 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-02, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
--- SNIP ---
Here in Spain we celebrate it on December 28th instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day#Other_prank_days_in_the_world
What part
On 04/03/2011 04:24 AM, Heddle Weaver wrote:
[snip]
The logical progression, in the English language and not the American
dialect, is 'day' of the 'month' of the specified 'year'. dd/mm/yy.
This is obvious.
Only obvious if you've grown up that way.
However, 3 Jan 2011 *slightly* reduces
On 04/03/2011 07:18 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:19:49 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-02, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
--- SNIP ---
Here in Spain we celebrate it on December 28th instead.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 02:06, Scott Ferguson
prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity - I've attached a (tiny) screenscrape of how a post
appears in Thunderbird (yeah I know, but the rest of things are Debian).
I guess the date format on the left is from the list, and the one on
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:10, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
handwriting
What's that?
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 04/03/2011 12:35 PM, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:10, Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
handwriting
What's that?
Something that some American schools still teach to children.
--
Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure
the liberty and
On 2011-04-02, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
--- SNIP ---
Here in Spain we celebrate it on December 28th instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day#Other_prank_days_in_the_world
What part of Cultural Imperialism don't you
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
toli...@debian.org wrote:
It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our announcement at
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401
In my eyes that's the only thing you cant do on 1st April, state that
your prank aint one. Followed up by a
On 04/02/2011 12:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 15:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
[snip]
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month
On 04/02/2011 12:45 AM, Doug wrote:
On 04/02/2011 12:40 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the
heck says Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011?) and *monumentally
shortsighted* (did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
OpenVMS does it one of the two
On Saturday 02 April 2011 12:18:03 Simon Hollenbach wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
toli...@debian.org wrote:
It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our announcement at
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401
In my eyes that's the only thing you cant do on
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Why not use the Debian standard??
Reasoning - it's already been extensively debated *and* voted on, it's a
system already in place, it's the Debian way.
(Is there more than one (Debian standard)?)
From :-
In 4d96a8c3.9080...@cox.net, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the heck
says Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011?)
and *monumentally shortsighted*
(did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
What makes you say this is UNIX time? The UNIX standard provides
On 04/02/2011 06:31 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In4d96a8c3.9080...@cox.net, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the heck
says Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011?)
and *monumentally shortsighted*
(did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
What makes
On 02/04/11 23:35, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Why not use the Debian standard??
^ It *was* a question, and I *was* soliciting an answer.
Reasoning - it's already been extensively debated *and* voted on, it's a
system already in
On 2011-04-01, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
Hi Jerome!
* Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net [110401 05:16]:
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our announcement at
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401
Best Regards,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Liam O'Toole liam.p.oto...@gmail.com wrote:
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
I think it is rather about that famous date of
Dne, 01. 04. 2011 11:37:32 je Alexander Reichle-Schmehl napisal(a):
Hi Jerome!
* Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net [110401 05:16]:
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our
On 01/04/11 20:17, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I
* On 2011 01 Apr 04:39 -0500, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi Jerome!
* Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net [110401 05:16]:
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:17:42 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
Perhaps on an international list we should say the month names as Liam
has here. Otherwise one
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 20:24, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
January 11th, 2004? huh?
Cheers,
The community distributions have already worked close together and coordinated
the solution of common issues, e.g., the top-level /run directory, see
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/150031.html
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote the following on 01.04.2011 11:37
It's neither a hack nor a joke. See our announcement at
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401
Best Regards,
Alexander, Press Office and Developer
http://www.debian.org/
http://www.gentoo.org/
Nate Bargmann wrote:
Had this included Fedora it would be very difficult to pass this off as
joke. Still, the idea of the various community distributions working in
closer harmony is good for our community. Checking the Debian, Arch,
and OpenSUSE homepages just now and the fact that the same
* On 2011 01 Apr 07:49 -0500, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
The community distributions have already worked close together and coordinated
the solution of common issues, e.g., the top-level /run directory, see
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/150031.html
Nice example and
Dne, 01. 04. 2011 14:48:48 je Jörg-Volker Peetz napisal(a):
The community distributions have already worked close together and
coordinated
the solution of common issues, e.g., the top-level /run directory,
see
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/150031.html
--
Regards,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:01:41PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/04/11 20:17, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
Perhaps on an
On 01/04/11 15:09, Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 01. 04. 2011 14:48:48 je Jörg-Volker Peetz napisal(a):
The community distributions have already worked close together and
coordinated
the solution of common issues, e.g., the top-level /run directory, see
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the date:
2011-04-01 or 20110401 is defined as April 1, 2011, or truncated as
11-04-01 or 110401.
Standards. Who would have thought?
Klistvud wrote:
Speaking of top-level changes: anyone care to enlighten me what's this
/.ure directory doing in my system partition? It annoys the heck out
of me.
Curiosity got the better of me, so I did a little digging. Looks like
./ure might be a configuration or component directory for
green wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the date:
2011-04-01 or 20110401 is defined as April 1, 2011, or truncated as
11-04-01 or 110401.
Standards. Who would have
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:31:33 +0200
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
On 01/04/11 05:24, Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess
On 2011-04-01 09:12:01 green wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the date:
Standards. Who would have thought?
Precisely. I'm in the US, but I always write dates like that.
I'm
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote at 2011-04-01 12:34 -0500:
On 2011-04-01 09:12:01 green wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the date:
Standards. Who would have thought?
On 20110401_051637, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
Apparently not a joke.
So, what will change in Debian? Is there there a place to go to read about
what parts of Debian the
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:17:52PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20110401_051637, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
Apparently not a joke.
... except tomorrow, when you see that
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:35:27AM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 20:24, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:06:24AM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 05:31:33 +0200
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
On 01/04/11 05:24, Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
On Sid:
aptitude show cant
Paquet : cant
État: non installé
Version : 0.8.15-1
Priorité :
tv.deb...@googlemail.com:
On Sid:
aptitude show cant
Paquet : cant
État: non installé
Version : 0.8.15-1
Priorité : supplémentaire
Section : admin
Responsable : Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org
This installs the following shell script as /usr/bin/cant:
|#!/bin/bash
|
Em 19:59, Nate Bargmann escreveu:
* On 2011 01 Apr 07:49 -0500, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
The community distributions have already worked close together and
coordinated
the solution of common issues, e.g., the top-level /run directory, see
On 04/01/2011 07:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:17:42 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do with it??
Perhaps on an international list we should say the month
On 04/01/2011 08:11 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 09:01:41PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 01/04/11 20:17, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freemanhew...@gmail.com wrote:
04/01/11 !
What does the 4th of January have to do
On 02/04/11 05:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20110401_051637, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
Apparently not a joke.
So, what will change in Debian? Is there there a place to go to
On 04/01/2011 02:18 PM, Freeman wrote:
[snip]
Well, ISO dates are the best. And *all* the cultures of the world are
magnificent.
No, not *all* of the cultures of the world are magnificent. In fact,
there's pretty hard evidence that some of them really suck. But that's
getting way
On 04/01/2011 04:17 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
Ron Johnson writes:
What part of Cultural Imperialism don't you understand?
Yes. Those northern European can be pretty pushy, can't they? Good to
see that the Spaniards have been able to hold to the old ways. (see the
subject line for a hint).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 04/01/2011 08:09 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 04:17 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:05:54 Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-04-01, Freemanhew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green greenfreedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the date:
2011-04-01 or 20110401 is defined as April 1, 2011, or truncated as
On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green greenfreedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO 8601, there should
be no ambiguity in the date:
2011-04-01 or 20110401 is
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green greenfreedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For international mailing lists, if you stick with ISO
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 04:57, Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss +
ISO format available.
--
Mars 2 Stay!
http://xkcd.com/801/
/etc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/04/11 13:50, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 07:12, green greenfreedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Toponce wrote at 2011-04-01 08:11 -0500:
For
On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
[snip]
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss +
Too verbose, not sortable
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
So...
the RFC
On 02/04/11 15:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/01/2011 11:17 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/04/11 14:57, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 20:23, Scott Ferguson
[snip]
Why not use the Debian standard??
day-of-week, dd month hh:mm:ss +
Too verbose, not sortable
Cheers,
On 04/02/2011 12:40 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
I've always thought that Unix Time is *incredibly stupid* (who the
heck says Fri Apr 1 23:27:41 CDT 2011?) and *monumentally
shortsighted* (did nothing happen before 01-Jan-1970?).
OpenVMS does it one of the two Right Ways of displaying time
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury
Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
--
Regards,
Freeman
Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is
On 01/04/11 05:24, Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:16:37AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
right now, the Official Debian site seems hacked by The Canterbury Distribution.
I guess it is a joke.
04/01/11 !
Indeed :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
73 matches
Mail list logo
