On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 02:26:32AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Well, looking at your scripts:
you have won several Useless Use of Cat Awards
A bad habit of mine, I'm afraid...
Or perhaps pigeons just like cats. :)
Many a true word is spoken in jest... Some pigeons enjoy teasing cats,
and
Hi,
* Vincent Lefevre wrote (2004-01-31 01:09):
However, procmail isn't perfect. The main problem is that it isn't
very powerful and may need other tools (mainly formail, but also
perl for the most complicated filters). A 100% perl-based solution
(with primitives for MIME decoding) would probably
Moin,
* Adam Aube wrote (2004-01-31 04:18):
On Friday 30 January 2004 07:09 pm, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
However, procmail isn't perfect. The main problem is that it isn't
very powerful and may need other tools (mainly formail, but also
perl for the most complicated filters). A 100% perl-based
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-01-30 18:34:17 +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
See http://www.exim.org/ . Click on Documentation and FAQs.
There are several things I don't like:
You're probably right on most of those, exim filtering isn't
the
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:09:21AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
* A result of a pipe can't be retrieved (and that's why the FAQ
recommends to use procmail for such things).
...you mean that if you pipe a message through some external program
you can't then feed the output of that program
Incoming from Pigeon:
exim -bm. Useful if you want to avoid having to learn
Sanskrit^Wprocmail.
For example, the following is what I use to strip the advertising from
Yahoo Groups mailing list traffic:
Oh yes, that's far simpler than learning Sanskrit^Wprocmail. Yesiree,
Bob! You
On 2004-01-30 22:18:58 -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
Have you looked at maildrop?
I hesitated between maildrop and procmail and chose procmail propably
because I was already using it on another account. But maildrop is
installed on my machine. BTW, does anyone know when the new version
(1.6.3) will be
On 2004-01-31 18:43:10 +, Pigeon wrote:
...you mean that if you pipe a message through some external program
you can't then feed the output of that program back into exim? It
initially appears so, but it's straightforward to write a shellscript
wrapper for the external program that adds a
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:45:04PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Pigeon:
exim -bm. Useful if you want to avoid having to learn
Sanskrit^Wprocmail.
For example, the following is what I use to strip the advertising from
Yahoo Groups mailing list traffic:
Oh yes, that's far
On 2004-01-31 23:51:55 +, Pigeon wrote:
I don't think I'm trying to say don't use procmail. Just that
there's more than one way to skin a cat. Which is one of the things I
like about Linux. I had the choice between figure out procmail and
use bash / ed / exim which I already know; I took
On Friday 30 January 2004 07:09 pm, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
However, procmail isn't perfect. The main problem is that it isn't
very powerful and may need other tools (mainly formail, but also
perl for the most complicated filters). A 100% perl-based solution
(with primitives for MIME decoding)
11 matches
Mail list logo
