>> Well if you were prepared to type a search for
>> computational linguistics software into google, you would
>> find several free tools available for linux listed on pages
>> such as
>>
>> https://martinweisser.org/corpora_site/comp_ling_resources.html
>
> Indeed, that page has 4 hits for Unix
debian-user wrote:
> Well if you were prepared to type a search for computational
> linguistics software into google, you would find several
> free tools available for linux listed on pages such as
>
> https://martinweisser.org/corpora_site/comp_ling_resources.html
Indeed, that page has 4 hits
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > Those books teach and discuss some of the software that's
> > used. I doubt you will find them in debian's repositories.
> > Of course you can do plenty of computational linguistics
> > with perl or python which you already have.
> >
> > What
>> A basic search finds this web tool:
>>
>> https://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics/
>
> I didn't get it to work in Emacs-w3m, be it lack of JavaScript
> support or something else. Anyway the page and tool claims to
> do this:
>
> Total Word Count
> Total Word Count (Excluding
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Those books teach and discuss some of the software that's
> used. I doubt you will find them in debian's repositories.
> Of course you can do plenty of computational linguistics
> with perl or python which you already have.
>
> What is a "regular expression" which is at
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, 10:32 AM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > If you have python programming skills, you might
> > consider NLTK
>
> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
> but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>
Joel Roth wrote:
> A basic search finds this web tool:
>
> https://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics/
I didn't get it to work in Emacs-w3m, be it lack of JavaScript
support or something else. Anyway the page and tool claims to
do this:
Total Word Count
Total Word Count
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> If you have python programming skills, you might
> consider NLTK
Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>>>
>>> There's a big subject called computational linguistics.
>>>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023, 8:32 AM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> >>> If you have python programming skills, you might consider
> >>> NLTK
> >>
> >> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
> >> but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
> >>
> >
> >
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>>> If you have python programming skills, you might consider
>>> NLTK
>>
>> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already,
>> but I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>>
>
> There's a big subject called computational linguistics.
> They have
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023, 3:04 PM Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Cousin Stanley wrote:
>
> > If you have python programming skills, you might consider
> > NLTK
>
> Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already, but
> I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
>
There's a big subject
dvalin wrote:
> As "stats" is a grab bag larger inside than the Tardis,
> I suspect that only on that other ship with the infinite
> improbability drive is a stats babelfish interpreter to be
> found. For the last 30+ years, I've just thrown together
> a few lines of Awk to generate the initially
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> tomas wrote:
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the
> report included, of course.
> >>>
> >>> If you can bear some tweaking, R is it.
> >>
> >> Sure! Let's run R on this e-mail. Does it work and if so,
tomas wrote:
I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the
report included, of course.
>>>
>>> If you can bear some tweaking, R is it.
>>
>> Sure! Let's run R on this e-mail. Does it work and if so, what
>> does it say?
>
> T a generic question -- a generic answer
R is a
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:00:05PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> tomas wrote:
>
> >> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> >> indata - e.g.,
> >>
> >> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
> >>
> >> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> >> included, of
Emanuel Berg writes:
> Sure! Let's run R on this e-mail. Does it work and if so, what
> does it say?
Run 'apt-cache show r-base'. You will want to look at all the 'r-cran'
packages for one that does what you need.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
tomas wrote:
>> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
>> indata - e.g.,
>>
>> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>>
>> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
>> included, of course.
>
> If you can bear some tweaking, R is it.
Sure! Let's run R on this
Cousin Stanley wrote:
> If you have python programming skills, you might consider
> NLTK
Unbelievable if there are no such tools anywhere already, but
I don't have one either so maybe there aren't then?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Joel Roth wrote:
> A basic search finds this web tool:
>
> https://www.usingenglish.com/resources/text-statistics/
Cool, I'll get back to you when I tried it God willing ...
> Otherwise, I think you'll have to write your own -- or hire
> someone (like me :^) to write one for you.
Surely there
paulf wrote:
>>> I don't know about all of your wishlist, but gnuplot is
>>> the proper tool for taking data from, say, a CSV file, and
>>> putting it into graphs of various types.
>>
>> Well, gnuplot is great obviously but is more a tool to
>> visualize data, organized data, here we need a tool
On 2023-06-23 13:30, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
>$ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
>
> To produce neat stats, maybe even figures, and
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:20:50PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
If you can bear some tweaking,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:20:50PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
>
> To produce neat stats,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 23:05:10 +0200
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> paulf wrote:
>
> > I don't know about all of your wishlist, but gnuplot is the
> > proper tool for taking data from, say, a CSV file, and
> > putting it into graphs of various types.
>
> Well, gnuplot is great obviously but is more a
paulf wrote:
> I don't know about all of your wishlist, but gnuplot is the
> proper tool for taking data from, say, a CSV file, and
> putting it into graphs of various types.
Well, gnuplot is great obviously but is more a tool to
visualize data, organized data, here we need a tool to analyze
and
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 22:20:50 +0200
Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Is there a CLI and FOSS tool that creates stats from text
> indata - e.g.,
>
> $ txt2stats path/to/indata/*.txt
>
> I mean a general tool, but with options to tweak the report
> included, of course.
>
> To produce neat stats, maybe
26 matches
Mail list logo
