Quoting Kumar Appaiah on 2010-09-10 13:18:06, in Message-Id
20100910181805.gi13...@146653177.ece.utexas.edu
If someone else can point our the right way, please do.
,[ /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00trustcdrom ]-
| APT::Authentication::TrustCDROM true;
`
--
_ Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:22:19PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
I am using Debian CD images as a local repository. I am mounting a CD and
using it with this source list:
deb file:///mnt lenny main
Everything working fine but the problem is when I try to install a package
from this repository,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:14:11PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
In any case, to fix the error you get, you have to identify the GPG
key corresponding to the CD, and obtain it (preferably in a trusted
manner), and do
sudo apt-ket add - key
Where can I get this keys? CD images doesn't
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:58:01AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Is there a particular reason why you don't want to use apt-cdrom to
use the CD repositories? It is much easier than mounting the CD to use
it.
I also tried apt-cdrom but I have same problem with apt-cdrom.
I added my image with:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:25:54AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Please paste the error message here. It would contain the key ID.
There is no error. Debian CD images doesn't have any signature or key.
Or maybe I am doing something wrong.
Also I want to add, I don't have any CD-ROM drive. I am
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:36:03PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:25:54AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Please paste the error message here. It would contain the key ID.
There is no error. Debian CD images doesn't have any signature or key.
I see. I thought apt-get update
Kumar thank you for your help.
But Debian is identify their CDs in a different way. I don't know how to
doing this. The repository in the images are not signed. When I use CD
images after burn them to a blank CD, Debian successfully identify cdroms.
But when I try to use them as images after
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:26:49PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
In the early times, I was manually sign my local Release. Maybe I should
continue to do this.
Since I don't have any other ideas, I'd actually not be averse to
that. You could sign your repository yourself, with a key which APT is
8 matches
Mail list logo
