On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:41:16 -0500,
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I know nothing about list software, so if that's the case, I
guess one would have to be quite trusting to give that power.
Precisely, and that is unlikely to happen.
And you're being the smart-ass by
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:01:37PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
snip
If you think that any organization would be willing to hand
over listmaster powers to anyone on the 'net, you are probably too
innocent to be a list master.
My gosh, you guys act like a listmaster is God. It's not
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 12:55:53 -0500,
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030329 01:15]:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:55:55 -0500, Hall Stevenson
Are you volunteering to help them out by monitoring the mailing
list?
I would think as much as it
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030330 04:07]:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 12:55:53 -0500,
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030329 01:15]:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:55:55 -0500, Hall Stevenson
Are you volunteering to help them out by
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Oh, as for subscription address, maybe we need to tell
outlook user how to read their mail header. People
forgets where they subscribed from and outlook users tend
to lack skill to find it or read web site.
On Friday 28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:55:28PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
In addition, I wonder... what about having such misplaced unsub-requests
generate an auto-reply. Don't forward them anywhere, just fire back a
form letter that says something like:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
joking
Actullay implementing this test will be real easy, just cancel the web
subscription form...
/joking
I thought this was a good solution for a while, too. But then I
helped a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:06:12PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Listmaster should not waist his time on this kind of bad behaviors of
the mailing list users.
Actually, my beef as that listmaster never responds to anything. I've
tried contacting the
* Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030328 13:48 PST]:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
style=mostly joking
Or, we could require users to pass some sort of comprehension test
before successfully subscribing to the list
/style
joking
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030329 01:15]:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:55:55 -0500,
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would think that the listmaster for each list would have an
interest in the discussions that take place in it. You know,
they're a Debian-user like
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030329 05:00]:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:06:12PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Listmaster should not waist his time on this kind of bad behaviors of
the mailing list users.
Actually, my beef as that listmaster never responds to anything. I've
tried
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 01:09:34AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:55:28PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
Make it less abusive to the potentially misguided but harmless user
(assume they have a clue but cocked it up by accident).
Well, yes. I did actually specify in the same
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 03:23, Al Davis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Oh, as for subscription address, maybe we need to tell
outlook user how to read their mail header. People
forgets where they subscribed from and outlook users tend
to lack
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:14:24PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
I am getting the impression that many people commenting in this thread
didn't pay attention to what the OP was dealing with. IIUC, his email
address has been changed by his ISP from .com to .net, and while they
are still accepting
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:14:24PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
[ snip ]
I am getting the impression that many people commenting in this thread
didn't pay attention to what the OP was dealing with. IIUC, his email
address has been changed by his ISP from .com to .net, and while they
are still
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:04:35AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:54:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yeah, this
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:50:58PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:54:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read*
this list.
Yeah, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 01:46:52PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
Are you suggesting that I go ahead and set this up at my end?
I did for a while.
I suppose I could do that... though my intent was to try and sell the
idea to the listmasters and have it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
You've commented twice (or more) about this and he/she has yet to defend
themself... Do they have to ?? No, I realize they don't. Do they even
read this list and see Paul's message ??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Does anyone see problem forwarding [EMAIL PROTECTED] mails
with unsubscribe to be filtered from this list and to be forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Although it may have little side
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Does anyone see problem forwarding [EMAIL PROTECTED] mails
with unsubscribe to be filtered from this list and to be forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Although it may have little side
effects, it shall reduce noise significantly.
At 04:04 AM 3/28/2003 -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi list,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:51:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Spam complaints are only valid when it's unsolicited commercial
...
Help us help you by following through with your calls for help.
Bitching and complaining loudly without
]
Sent: 28 March 2003 13:25
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: How should we handle people who can not unsubscribe?
At 04:04 AM 3/28/2003 -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi list,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:51:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Spam complaints are only valid when it's unsolicited commercial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yes, I realize that there are instructions in every message that gets
posted how to do it, BUT OBVIOUSLY
On Friday 28 March 2003 15:22, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Oh, as for subscription address, maybe we need to tell outlook user how
to read their mail header. People forgets where they subscribed from
and outlook users tend to lack
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Oh, as for subscription address, maybe we need to tell outlook user how
to read their mail header. People forgets where they subscribed from
and outlook users tend to lack skill to find it or read web site.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi list,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:51:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Spam complaints are only valid when it's unsolicited commercial
...
Help us help you by following through with your calls for help.
Bitching and complaining
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Oh, as for subscription address, maybe we need to tell outlook user how
to read their mail header. People forgets where they subscribed from
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yeah, this listmaster-doesn't-read-the-list thing is puzzling me. I'd
have thought reading the list was an essential prerequisite for being
the listmaster.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 03:39:16AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Does anyone see problem forwarding [EMAIL PROTECTED] mails
with unsubscribe to be filtered from this list and to be forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
I don't think
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:26:47AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yes, I realize that there are instructions in every message that gets
posted how to
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
style=mostly joking
Or, we could require users to pass some sort of comprehension test
before successfully subscribing to the list
/style
joking
Actullay implementing this test will be real easy, just
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 10:23:18AM -0800, Paul E Condon wrote:
On the other hand, a person who is having
difficulty unsubscribing even after receiving the verbose instruction
letter should be able to ask for help on the list.
That's easily dealt with. Have the auto-reply trigger only on
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:10:27PM +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04:38AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Oh, as for subscription address, maybe we need to tell outlook user how
to read their mail header. People
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:54:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yeah, this listmaster-doesn't-read-the-list thing is puzzling me. I'd
have thought reading
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:54:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yeah, this listmaster-doesn't-read-the-list thing is puzzling me. I'd
have thought reading the
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030328 21:28]:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 06:54:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It would help if the listmaster was someone who actually *read* this list.
Yeah, this
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:55:55 -0500,
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would think that the listmaster for each list would have an
interest in the discussions that take place in it. You know,
they're a Debian-user like the rest of us ??
List Masters are not there per list.
38 matches
Mail list logo
