Re: Mozilla fonts

2003-12-23 Thread Joel Konkle-Parker
Marc Wilson wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:02PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace. Uhhh... Andale Mono *is* a monospace font. Exactly what do you expec

Re: Mozilla fonts

2003-12-23 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:41:02PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa > Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace. Uhhh... Andale Mono *is* a monospace font. Exactly what do you expect to be happening

Re: Mozilla fonts

2003-12-23 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: I think my fonts are screwed up in Mozilla 1.0.0... Under Preferences > Appearance > Fonts, everything is set to "Agfa Monotype-andale mono-iso8859-1" and Slashdot renders in full monospace. What does everyone else's fonts section have by default? I'm using Mozilla 1.0

Re: Re: Mozilla fonts

2003-09-15 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Ashish Ariga wrote: > Turns out that Mozilla and a bunch of other GNOME/GTK2 apps use > fonts that are configured via some fontconfig. (I don't know > much about it.) > fc-list reports fonts that are available through fontconfig. > Ensure that the path where you installed the fonts are listed in >

Re: Mozilla fonts (resolved ?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ashish Ariga
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:29, Ashish Ariga wrote: > On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:20, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > > The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default' > > fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for > > tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font i

Re: Mozilla fonts

2003-09-15 Thread Ashish Ariga
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:20, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > The newer mozillas, e.g. Sid's mozilla-snapshot, have 'default' > fonts which I rather like (of course, 'there is no accounting for > tastes'). In the Preferences menu, the serif font is just called > 'serif', the monospace font is called 'm

Re: Mozilla fonts

2002-06-15 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:42:46AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote: > > > Ross Boylan wrote: > >I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number > >of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about > >what is going on. > > > >1. I can't find anything that contr

Re: Mozilla fonts

2002-06-14 Thread Travis Crump
Ross Boylan wrote: I was playing around with fonts on Mozilla today, and noticed a number of odd things. I'd be curious if anyone can explain a bit more about what is going on. 1. I can't find anything that controls the fonts used in the browser menu bar and menus. It looks as if the same fo

Re: Mozilla fonts huge--'File' menu item takes up most of screen

2002-01-18 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Daniel" == Daniel Farnsworth Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Daniel> When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at > Daniel> 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of > Daniel

Re: Mozilla fonts huge--'File' menu item takes up most of screen

2002-01-17 Thread Joseph Dane
> "Daniel" == Daniel Farnsworth Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> When I start up Mozilla, the fonts are *huge*. I'm running at Daniel> 1600x1200, and the 'File' menu item takes up the majority of Daniel> the screen (nice scaling, by the way--not a bit blocky : ). no help here,

Re: mozilla fonts giant-sized

2001-08-14 Thread Ross Boylan
Despite my having done nothing, appearance is back to normal. (I did lots of things yesterday, but none of them had any effect. I've since shut down and restarted the computer. I also forgot to mention that immediately before the unpleasantness I installed realplayer.) Weird. On Mon, Aug 13, 20