On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:50:28AM -0600, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> Do you see that I am in potential trouble for not using kernel package
> like
> 1) I am confusing apt thinking I am in the old kernel
> 2) I am confusing config of packages that might use the apt notion of
> installe
---
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:36:09AM -0600, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> > Thanks Collin. The code that is causing problem is in kernel-2.6.test9
> > asm/checksum.h.
>
> Are you sure? I've got 2.6.1-rc1 here patched for powerpc, but the code
> seems to be correct there.
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:36:09AM -0600, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> Thanks Collin. The code that is causing problem is in kernel-2.6.test9
> asm/checksum.h.
Are you sure? I've got 2.6.1-rc1 here patched for powerpc, but the code
seems to be correct there.
--
Colin Watson
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:46:56AM -0600, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> > I changed gcc from 3.3.2 version to 2.95.4 and everything compiles
> > well. So, now I am wondering if this is a real gcc problem.
>
> No; see my previous message. gcc 3.3.2 is stricter than 2.95.4, but
> correctly s
Robert,
Your message does help. It reinforces my claim that the problem is gcc 3.3.2. I have
independantly
verified it by compiling using gcc 2.95.4 and yes it compiles as expected.
Regards
Ramesh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
5 matches
Mail list logo