Björn Abt wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed
Debian Sarge netinst on this machine and after examining the system i found out
that top only shows 906MB RAM, even /proc/meminfo shows only 906MB. I tried
this with both the 2.4
How exactly do you do that?
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G
CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Jerr
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 14:05 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
Björn Abt wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed
Debian Sarge netinst on this machine and
JerryN wrote:
How exactly do you do that?
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G
CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Jerr
Either download a highmem enabled kernel or build one (with make-kpkg)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which kernels for a 386 would be 4GB enabled?
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 14:11 +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
JerryN wrote:
How exactly do you do that?
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G
CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Jerr
Either download a highmem enabled kernel or build one (with make-kpkg)
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:22:45AM -0500, JerryN wrote:
Which kernels for a 386 would be 4GB enabled?
I don't think any of the default debian kernels are 4GB enabled,
are they? Their package names don't mention it, anyway. You may have
to build your own. Is there someplace to download highmem
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200):
I have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB
and the Gnome system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB enabled:
so far I thought that 1GB was smaller that 4GB.
Jerome
Björn Abt wrote:
Hello
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:39:12 +, Jerome BENOIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200):
I have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB
and the Gnome system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 13:39 +, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200): I
have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB and the Gnome
system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB enabled: so far
Thanks for the reply.
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:39:12 +, Jerome BENOIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200):
I have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB
and the Gnome system monitor 884 MB.
I
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 13:39 +, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200): I
have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB and the Gnome
system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 14:15 +, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200): I
have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB and the Gnome
system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB enabled: so far I thought
that
Sam Watkins wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:22:45AM -0500, JerryN wrote:
Which kernels for a 386 would be 4GB enabled?
I don't think any of the default debian kernels are 4GB enabled,
are they? Their package names don't mention it, anyway. You may have
to build your own. Is there
Björn Abt wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed
Debian Sarge netinst on this machine and after examining the system i found out
that top only shows 906MB RAM, even /proc/meminfo shows only 906MB. I tried
this with both the 2.4
Intriguing! So many words in this track being said but nothing really
of any value whatever...
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 16:02 +, Joao Clemente wrote:
Björn Abt wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed
Debian Sarge netinst on
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 15:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 13:39 +, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron 8200): I
have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB and the Gnome
system
I have the book. Sorry, but it's about as practically informative as
these numerous emails.
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 18:24 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 15:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 13:39 +, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 12:33 -0500, JerryN wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron
8200): I have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB
and the Gnome system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB enabled:
Nobody has said which kernel would work. I am using the 386 kernel.
As I understand it, the 686 is only for Pentium 4's. I've seen several
emails about that.
So I would love to see something practical and very specific. In as far
as real world commands that are needed in order to utilize
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 14:03 -0500, JerryN wrote:
Nobody has said which kernel would work. I am using the 386 kernel.
As I understand it, the 686 is only for Pentium 4's. I've seen several
emails about that.
So I would love to see something practical and very specific. In as far
as
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 12:33 -0500, JerryN wrote:
Hello List,
I observed a similar behaviour on my Sarge laptop (Inspiron
8200): I have 1GB ram but /proc/mening shows (only) 905136 kB
and the Gnome system monitor 884 MB.
I have to say that my kernel is not 4GB enabled: so
On Thursday, 23.12.2004 at 14:03 -0500, JerryN wrote:
Nobody has said which kernel would work. I am using the 386 kernel.
Nobody has said which kernel would work because for a system with that
much RAM, the consensus is that you probably need to rebuild your kernel
yourself.
As I
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:36:51PM +, Dave Ewart wrote:
As I understand it, the 686 is only for Pentium 4's. I've seen
several emails about that.
686 is for any Pentium-based system and above, not just P4. Unless your
system is *very* old, a 686 kernel should be OK.
686 is for
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:54:56 +0100, Björn Abt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed
Debian Sarge netinst on this machine and after examining the system i found
out that top only shows 906MB RAM, even /proc/meminfo
On Dec 23, 2004, at 2:53 PM, Sam Watkins wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:36:51PM +, Dave Ewart wrote:
As I understand it, the 686 is only for Pentium 4's. I've seen
several emails about that.
686 is for any Pentium-based system and above, not just P4. Unless
your
system is *very* old, a
Darryl Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:54:56 +0100, Björn Abt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed Debian Sarge netinst on this machine and after examining the system i found out that top only shows 906MB RAM, even
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:39:37 -0500, Roberto Sanchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darryl Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:54:56 +0100, Björn Abt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I have a HP DL360 G4 with 2GB ECC RAM and a P4-Xeon with 3 GHz. I installed
Debian Sarge netinst on this
Amazing how many incorrect assumptions have been made here. And of what
cynicism without any concept of assistance or acceptance. The proof of
faux nihilism exists here.
O.W. used to say, give a man a podium and what you have left is wood and
nails.
Au revoir!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
JerryN wrote:
Intriguing! So many words in this track being said but nothing really
of any value whatever...
Very well, Jerry, I feel from your words that my answer has not been
helpfull... nothing really of any value whatever
So, either you're stating that my english is so bad that I
Considering the topic and the thread, Andrea answered exaustively as
far as I would need to be helped if I was in your shoes. I deeply
recommend you reading this, I do believe this will help you greatly
getting help in the future:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Maybe you
JerryN([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Amazing how many incorrect assumptions have been made here. And of what
cynicism without any concept of assistance or acceptance. The proof of
faux nihilism exists here.
O.W. used to say, give a man a podium and what you have left is
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 18:33, JerryN wrote:
I have the book. Sorry, but it's about as practically informative as
these numerous emails.
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 18:24 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 15:15, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday,
JerryN wrote:
Intriguing! So many words in this track being said but nothing really
of any value whatever...
we need a global jerk database for people like this
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
32 matches
Mail list logo
