On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 16:25, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I note that when the Sarge installer created my sources.list file, it put a
line in as follows:
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
...
Question: Am I correct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 August 2004 10:32, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 16:25, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I note that when the Sarge installer created my sources.list file, it put
a line
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 04:32:41PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 16:25, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I note that when the Sarge installer created my sources.list file, it put a
line in as follows:
deb
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 16:42, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding all this...
Security team finds hole.
Security team fixes hole.
Security team NMU's woody-proposed-updates (exactly what section doesn't
really matter.)
Stefan O'Rear writes:
Security team finds hole.
Security team fixes hole.
Security team NMU's woody-proposed-updates
Security team contacts maintainer.
Maintainer applies patch.
Maintainer uploads to sid.
Someone finds hole and notifies maintainer and/or security team.
Security is notified
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:27:21PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Someone finds hole and notifies maintainer and/or security team.
Security is notified if they don't know already.
Maintainer is notified if he doesn't know already.
Security team and/or maintainer fixes hole.
Security team NMU's
Oliver Elphick writes:
The patch must be limited to the security features.
Nothing from sid (unstable) ever goes into woody (stable), only into
sarge (testing) which is soon to become the new stable.
I don't see that he implied otherwise.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
7 matches
Mail list logo
